Russ Allbery wrote:
> Uoti Urpala writes:
> > Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> +pie causes a fairly ordinary regular binary (gnubg) to die with a bus
> >> error immediately upon execution. If someone could figure out why and
> >> whether it's a general class of problems or something peculiar to that
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: pear-symfony-project-channel
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Goirand
* URL : http://pear.symfony-project.com/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: XML
Description : PEAR Symfo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: libpostproc
Version : ?
Upstream Author : Michael Niedermayer (michae...@gmx.at)
* URL : http://git.videolan.org/?p=libpostproc.git;a=summary
* License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: C
Des
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nuno Carvalho
* Package name: libbiblio-thesaurus-perl
Version : 0.42
Upstream Author : Alberto Simões
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Biblio-Thesaurus/
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Des
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 20:03:27 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> If a package is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", files with the same
> name have to be (byte-to-byte) identical across all architectures.
> Unfortunately, not all packages obey this requirement. I set up a
> page to track violators:
>
> htt
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 11:49:08AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> If we would converge on a good rule of thumb to replace the nth NMU in
> a row to a QA orphaning, then I believe that the updated NMU section
> in the Developers Reference would then stay unchanged for a long time.
I do see value in
* Charles Plessy , 2012-04-22, 11:49:
The point of NMUs is *helping* a maintainer which, for different
reasons, is temporarily unable to fix specific issues in their
packages. If the NMU-er keeps that principle in mind, everything else
descends more or less naturally.
Hi Stefano,
much of you
7 matches
Mail list logo
