m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> Is this the right time to do it?
I'm not sure that I see the point, and I say that as someone who replaces
Exim with Postfix on all of my boxes.
There's nothing particularly wrong with Exim; it works just fine. It's
been the default in Debian for years, an
Is this the right time to do it?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Toby Smithe
* Package name: despotify
Version : 1.0r520
Upstream Author : #HACK.SE
* URL : http://despotify.se/
* License : 2-clause BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Open source client for Spotify
Despotify
Package: wnpp
Owner: Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐)
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libxml-writer-string-perl
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Simon Oliver
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-Writer-S
On 2012-04-28, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> I'm looking for information regarding last known activity of=20
>
>Jan Christoph Nordholz
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641867#20 is what he
wrote on another package some months ago.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-
[Dmitry Smirnov]
> Petter, you sponsored last maintainer's upload back in 2009 - do you
> happen to hear from Jan lately?
Nope. Been busy elsewhere. :)
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 13:23:21, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> > I also am biased in one direction but shall not say which as I see no
> > benefit at this point in rehashing the discussion: Both packaging
> > "camps" have clearly demonstrated a lack of interest in letting t
On 12-04-28 at 01:50pm, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > As I understand the current status, it has already on this list been
> > resolved that *both* packages should back off from using the
> > clashing name "node".
> >
> > I also am biased in one direction but shall not say which
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> As I understand the current status, it has already on this list been
> resolved that *both* packages should back off from using the clashing
> name "node".
>
> I also am biased in one direction but shall not say which as I see no
> benefit at this point in rehashing th
On 04/28/2012 08:29 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> We are in 2012 and if a non-essential daemon blocks the boot (no working
> network), we have no way to get a getty to be run.
>
I agree with the rest of your post, but here, you are are
picturing a very badly written init script that doesn't have
a
* Carl Fürstenberg [2012-04-28 03:31 +0200]
> The the hamradio package "node" shipping a binary called "node", and
> as it's so old, the developers argue that the package must ship
> a binary called "node" or breakage will occur.
Upstream's INSTALL file contains:
| Node is intended to be called fr
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> I also am biased in one direction but shall not say which as I see no
> benefit at this point in rehashing the discussion: Both packaging
> "camps" have clearly demonstrated a lack of interest in letting the
> other use the name "node", which means we must both step
"brian m. carlson" writes:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:41:36AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> From a purely pragmatic POV, how many people are using both packages?
>> If the answer is zero, and this seems relatively likely, can't we just
>> add a Conflicts/Breaks and be done with it. Not a great
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:41:36AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >From a purely pragmatic POV, how many people are using both packages?
> If the answer is zero, and this seems relatively likely, can't we
> just add a Conflicts/Breaks and be done with it. Not a great solution,
> but it doesn't seem l
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> NULL pointer derreference.
> Install the -dbg packages for all libraries used by biber, compile biber
> with full debug information, and try running texl (the binary which is
> segfaulting) under gdb (maybe using xgdb or ddd to make it easier). You
> shoul
* Marcus Frings wrote:
> I'm running Debian unstable (32 bit) on various machines with local
> installations of TeXLive 2011 (both Debian and TeXLive are updated
> daily). Since a few days biber (which is part of TeXLive and replaces
> the old bibtex) crashes on all machines with a segmentation f
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, Marcus Frings wrote:
> Apr 28 12:25:52 black-ice kernel: [1216918.909369]
> /usr/local/texl[14001]: segfault at 0 ip b7591a11 sp bfd15c8c error 4 in
> libc-2.13.so[b7515000+156000]
NULL pointer derreference.
> I have uploaded the output of "strace biber --version" to
> http:/
On 12-04-28 at 03:31am, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> There has been an log struggle between the nodejs package and the node
> package, which is still unresolved (bug #611698 for example) And I
> wonder now what the future should look like.
>
> To summarize the problem:
> * the nodejs upstream binar
Hello everyone,
before asking here I have tried the German user mailing list of Debian
and comp.text.tex, too, but nobody could help me there, yet. So please
forgive me for sending my concern directly to the DD list.
I'm running Debian unstable (32 bit) on various machines with local
installation
> We have a process for requesting software to be packaged for Debian
> (RFPs), please read the following:
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Thanks. Here it is: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670701
-
Submit this report on wnpp (e to edit) [Y|n|a|c|e|i|l|m|p
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:14:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Carl Fürstenberg writes:
>
> > As I'm not a hamradio user, I'm off course biased towards letting nodejs
> > having the "node" binary and let it pass to testing. But we must find a
> > solution to this, as nodejs is getting more and m
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:14:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
[nodejs's vs. hamradio's /usr/bin/node]
> In an ideal world, *neither* application would be using "node", since it's
> a very generic name
You could rename the binary in both packages and then ask the user via
debconf and/or alternativ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Friday 27 April 2012 02:10 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
>> Say you want to mount a network disk during boot. This depend on
>> the
>>> network being configured. This in turn might depend on a DHCP
>>> reply from a DHCP server, and to send the DHCP
23 matches
Mail list logo
