Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Le 05/05/12 09:29, Philip Hands a écrit : > On Fri, 4 May 2012 19:00:10 +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles > wrote: ... >> Agreed. That's why my proposal was that *all* of those (Debian, >> Fedora, Suse, MacPorts and brew) did the rename, not just us >>

Re: How often is any package tested for FTBS on main arch ?

Le Saturday 5 May 2012 12:29:03, Neil Williams a écrit : > That would have been fine but the upload had been made without this > check being done. This could have been so much better if the discussion > had preceded the upload. ok. there's a misunderstanding. I do not want to justify the upload th

Bug#671744: ITP: rutorrent -- a web front-end for the rtorrent client

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andriy Senkovych * Package name: rutorrent Version : 3.4 Upstream Author : Alexander Moskalets * URL : http://code.google.com/p/rutorrent/ * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: PHP Description : a web front-end for

Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#614907: nodejs/node command conflict: why can't we have both?

On 05/04/2012 12:38 AM, Carsten Hey wrote: > Should not at least @debian.org addresses by default be whitelisted on > the tech-ctte list? I don't think so - the BTS is usefull to ensure that all discussion to a bug is collected at one place and not spread between the bug and the mailinglist. --

Re: Circular Build Dependencies

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Andres Mejia writes: > >> On May 3, 2012 10:20 AM, "Andres Mejia" wrote: >>> >>> On May 3, 2012 9:30 AM, "Pino Toscano" wrote: >>> > >>> > Alle giovedì 3 maggio 2012, Andres Mejia ha scritto: >>> > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM, P

Re: Bug#671302: Circular Build Dependencies (was Bug#671302: libav: circular dependency between libav and opencv)

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 04/05/12 21:45, Andres Mejia wrote: >> On May 4, 2012 4:43 PM, "Fabian Greffrath" > > wrote: >>> >>> > libav -> x264 -> libav >>> >>> AFAICT the x264 frontend uses libav whereas libav uses the libx264 shared >>

Re: pbuilder + ccache suddenly fails

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > I've routinely used pbuilder to build packages for years. > Yesterday, I have started to see the following failure: > > ccache: FATAL: Failed to create /var/cache/pbuilder/ccache/0/f: Permission > denied > > Any idea what's going on?  Goog

Re: pbuilder + ccache suddenly fails

On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 01:21:57PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > I've routinely used pbuilder to build packages for years. > > Yesterday, I have started to see the following failure: > > > > ccache: FATAL: Failed to create /var/cache/pbuil

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

Thibaut Paumard writes: > As I understand it, Policy is broken here: if the two binaries where > installed in /usr/bin, it would be fine (Policy-wise) to Conflict. Our current Policy specifically prohibits that. See Policy 10.1: Two different packages must not install programs with differe

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 08:29:40AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > How about doing the following: > node package replaced by a node-legacy package that contains no more > than a README and a symlink node --> ax25-node, and depends on > ax25-node As mentioned by Carsten Hey on debian-ctte, we s

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 03:07:27AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > We have until now maintained Nodejs only in unstable because requests to > rename axnode was met with either silence or refusal with the reasoning > that axnode was more widely used in Debian than Nodejs. > Obviously Nodejs is n

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

Greetings, dear Debian developer, [replying via bugreport as I am not subscribed to tech-ctte@d.o] On 12-05-06 at 10:22am, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 03:07:27AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > We have until now maintained Nodejs only in unstable because > > requests to re

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

Le dimanche 6 mai 2012 21:49:11, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Greetings, dear Debian developer, > > [replying via bugreport as I am not subscribed to tech-ctte@d.o] > > On 12-05-06 at 10:22am, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 03:07:27AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > We hav

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

On 12-05-06 at 11:00pm, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > Le dimanche 6 mai 2012 21:49:11, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Greetings, dear Debian developer, > > > > [replying via bugreport as I am not subscribed to tech-ctte@d.o] > > > > On 12-05-06 at 10:22am, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Sat, May 05

Bug#671779: ITP: qdjango -- Cross-platform C++ web development framework

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jeremy Lainé * Package name: qdjango Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Jeremy Lainé * URL : http://code.google.com/p/qdjango/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : Cross-platform C++ web developmen

Re: pbuilder + ccache suddenly fails

On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 01:21:57PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: >> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >> > I've routinely used pbuilder to build packages for years. >> > Yesterday, I have started to see the following fai

RFP: openjump -- OpenJUMP is an open source Geographic Information System (GIS) written in Java

This is bug #671787 - Forwarded message from Touko Korpela - Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 01:01:38 +0300 From: Touko Korpela To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: RFP: openjump -- OpenJUMP is an open source Geographic Information System (GIS) written in Java X-Mailer: repor

RFP bugs and debian-devel list

Aren't RFP bugs automatically forwarded to debian-devel, like ITP bugs? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120506231408.GA10470@tiikeri.vuoristo.local

Bug#671797: ITP: libdancer-logger-psgi-perl -- PSGI Log handler for Dancer

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard * Package name: libdancer-logger-psgi-perl Version : 0.04 Upstream Author : franck cuny * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Dancer-Logger-PSGI/ * License : Artistic or GPL-1+ Programming Lang: Perl D

Bug#662932:

I use windows and any time I put a pendrive in a usb drive that is or is not directly connected to the motherboard, I get a error and windows give me the blue screen. I tested in mint and it gaves me this error, I believe now, this is a problem with my hardware May 7 00:41:36 mint kernel: [ 880

Re: RFP bugs and debian-devel list

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Touko Korpela wrote: > Aren't RFP bugs automatically forwarded to debian-devel, like ITP bugs? No wnpp bugs (inc ITP) are automatically forwarded to debian-devel, to do that the submitter has to include the X-Debbugs-CC header or pseudo-header in their email. --

Re: Making -devel discussions more viable

On Thursday, May 03, 2012 10:49:22, Gergely Nagy wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli writes: > > 2) "don't feed the troll" + report abuses to listmasters and act > > > >accordingly > > Of the three, this is the least disruptive, in my opinion. Of course, > all the problems you mention (social awkwar

Re: Making -devel discussions more viable

On Thursday, May 03, 2012 02:50:41, Raphael Hertzog wrote: ... > When I see that the bad patterns tend to continue, I mail the listmasters > and ask them to send a warning to to the person. If enough persons > complain, they might even put a filter if that person doesn't stop. > > But it's difficu

free assimilation (git-svn migration) service offer

Hi, I've now converted a few SVN repos to Git for other Debian people. Since this is a one time task, it does not make much sense that everybody needs to learn how to do it. Therefor if anybody would like to have his old, inferior SVN repo assimilated and to join the collective, please open a

Re: Making -devel discussions more viable

On Sun, 06 May 2012, Chris Knadle wrote: > On Thursday, May 03, 2012 02:50:41, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Maybe we need a private DD-only list where people interested in > > improving our lists can CC their private complaints. listmasters > > could follow the list and take action when they notice t