Package: wnpp
Owner: Salvatore Bonaccorso
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libregexp-debugger-perl
Version : (not yet released)
Upstream Author : Damian Conway
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/di
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #662736
Owner: "Pedro I. Sanchez"
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #662736
Owner: "Pedro I. Sanchez"
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #662736
Owner: "Pedro I. Sanchez"
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : maxwell
Version : 1.2
Is there a reason that Debian has such an old version of glibc, even in
unstable?
The current upstream version of glibc seems to be 2.16, whereas Debian
has 2.13 (which is circa 2011-02).
[The particular improvement I'm interested in is a (significantly)
faster version of the "expf" function (unf
Hi,
On 18.07.2012 02:07, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Thank you, but I would appreciate if debian-devel-announce would stay
> dedicated to important announcements which may be useful for a wide
> range of developers.
While you are right in general I beg to disagree that tech-ctte
resolutions do aff
On 2012-07-12 14:59, Don Armstrong wrote:
=== Resolution ===
The Technical Committee reaffirms the importance of preventing namespace
collisions for programs in the distribution, while recognizing that
compatibility with upstreams and with previous Debian releases is also
important and that somet
>
> Lastly, I would like to thank Brian for his impressively 16-years long
> work on
> mime-support. Brian, feel free to stay among the uploaders !
>
Thanks. I wish I had the energy to make some of the much-needed changes
but I'm just not involved with the project enough these days to have a goo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: gwtexpui
Version : 1.2.6
Upstream Author : Shawn O. Pearce
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gerrit
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: Jav
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: gwtjsonrpc
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Shawn O. Pearce
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: Ja
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Leidert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: travis
Version : 120707
Upstream Author : Martin Brehm
* URL : http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~travis/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: gwtorm
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Shawn O. Pearce
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: Java
Hi,
On 2012-07-17 10:35, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Could someone who has the time and the tools available do a check on all
> the dependencies in main for dependencies on non-free/contrib? This
> information would be very helpful in evaluating tech-ctte bug #681419. In
> particular: [...]
I wrote a
* Niels Thykier , 2012-07-17, 20:03:
It would also be quite interesting, although much harder to determine,
whether there are any scenarios where such a dependency would result
in a non-free package being installed by default. If, for example,
there's a dependency on foo | foo-nonfree and some
Niels Thykier writes ("Re: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on
non-free/contrib"):
> I suspect installability checking of all packages should find them if
> they are there. One run with non-free+contrib and one without - the
> "newly" uninstallable between the two runs should be set you a
On 2012-07-17 19:35, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> [...]
>
> It would also be quite interesting, although much harder to determine,
> whether there are any scenarios where such a dependency would result in a
> non-free package being installed by default. If, for example, there's a
> depen
Hello all,
Could someone who has the time and the tools available do a check on all
the dependencies in main for dependencies on non-free/contrib? This
information would be very helpful in evaluating tech-ctte bug #681419. In
particular:
* How many total dependencies are there? (We're only int
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 07:30:48PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> So in answer to your question, there are plenty of Android devices
> which are trivially unlockable. (And once a Nexus phone is unlocked,
> it's you can get a root shell trivially; no jail-breaking necessary.
> Of course this is true for
Answering to my own mail.
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 05:38 +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 09:27 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > 2) Install in Alioth's collab-maint a git repository made with the --debsnap
> >option of git-import-dscs, unless we try to go deeper in t
Charles Plessy, 2012-07-14 02:48+0200 (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general):
> As the logic applied to the changelog and copyright files can be applied to
> most other files produced by the packager, like NEWS.Debian, it looks like the
> trend would be to have them installed in /var/lib/dpkg rather th
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 09:00:29AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just to give some context and background, this started with the
> discussion of binNMUs and multi-arch [0], related to file conflicts
> due to the coinstallability of multiple M-A:same instances, and while
> initially a wild
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann
* Package name: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Uwe Hermann, Joel Holdsworth
* URL : http://www.sigrok.org/wiki/Fx2lafw
* License : GPL2+, LGPL2.1+
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann
* Package name: sigrok-util
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : sigrok developers
* URL : http://www.sigrok.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description : sigrok related utilities
A colle
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 08:27:05PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > While it might work for some, there's a much simpler way to minimize
> > daemon downtime: Avoid stopping a daemon in the prerm, and instead
> > restart it in the postinst. Downtime then becomes < 1 second per daemon
> > (les
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:27:06PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 07/02/2012 10:53 AM, Silvio Cesare wrote:
> > Hi,
> > [ ... ]
> > Now some of these cases are going to be false positives. From looking at
> > the results, many of the vulns were probably fixed but have not been
> > reported in the
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:34:28PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I wrote a tool to detect versioned (build-)dependencies with
> possible missing (or insufficient) epochs. The results for unstable
> and a DD-list are attached.
>
> The source code is available at:
> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-qa/e
24 matches
Mail list logo
