Bug#683350: ITP: rebar -- Sophisticated build-tool for Erlang projects that follows OTP principles

2012-07-30 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu * Package name: rebar Version : 2.0.0 Upstream Author : Basho Team and other contributors * URL : https://github.com/basho/rebar * License : Apache-2.0, MIT, BSD Programming Lang: erlang Description

Bug#683333: ITP: ninja-build -- small build system closest in spirit to Make

2012-07-30 Thread Gary Kramlich
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: ninja-build Version: 120508+git638b033 Upstream Author: Google URL: http://martine.github.com/ninja/ License: Apache v2 Description: small build system closest in s

Bug#683332: ITP: ninja-build -- small build system closest in spirit to Make

2012-07-30 Thread Gary Kramlich
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: ninja-build Version: 120508+git638b033 Upstream Author: Google URL: http://martine.github.com/ninja/ License: Apache v2 Description: small build system closest in

Re: solving the network-manager-in-gnome problem

2012-07-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:10:33PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > This invokes the service ("runs the init.d script") with invoke-rc.d, if > > available. The rsync postscript should not need to check for invoke-rc.d > > anymore, it's been available in a required package for a long time now, > >

Bug#683291: ITP: soapdenovo -- short-read assembly method that can build a de novo draft assembly for the human-sized genomes

2012-07-30 Thread Olivier Sallou
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Olivier Sallou * Package name: soapdenovo Version : 1.0.5 Upstream Author : BGI-Shenzhen * URL : http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapdenovo.html * License : GPL3+ Programming Lang: C Description : short-read assembly

Re: CD sizes again (and BoF reminder!)

2012-07-30 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Adam Borowski , 2012-07-22, 23:51: having an option to disable fsync in dpkg without unreliable LD_PRELOAD tricks would be great. http://bugs.debian.org/613428 -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: solving the network-manager-in-gnome problem

2012-07-30 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2012-07-30 12:01:08 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-07-30 at 12:37pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > I'd say there is a need for: > > > > 1. a system-wide setting to start daemons or not on boot/upgrades/etc. > > 2. a blacklist - daemons listed here should not start no matter what > > 3. a wh

Re: solving the network-manager-in-gnome problem

2012-07-30 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2012-07-30 10:50:17 +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I'm writing this on a machine running squeeze, so this may be a bit > different in later versions, but here's the snippet: > > if [ -x /etc/init.d/rsync ]; then > if dpkg --compare-versions "$oldversion" lt "3.0.7-2"; then >

Re: solving the network-manager-in-gnome problem

2012-07-30 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-30 at 12:37pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Lu, 30 iul 12, 11:12:43, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2012-07-29 21:43:57 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > An ENABLE switch does more than just disabling the run-at-boot > > > state of an initscript. While I can buy the argument that some > >

Re: solving the network-manager-in-gnome problem

2012-07-30 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:12:43AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > I do believe that whenever an initscript is called with the argument > > "start", it should bloody well start, and not exit after doing > > nothing because I haven't edited some scarcely related file > > somewhere. > > As long as

Re: solving the network-manager-in-gnome problem

2012-07-30 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 30 iul 12, 11:12:43, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2012-07-29 21:43:57 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > An ENABLE switch does more than just disabling the run-at-boot state of > > an initscript. While I can buy the argument that some packages should > > not start *at boot* by default, > > Th

Re: solving the network-manager-in-gnome problem

2012-07-30 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2012-07-29 21:43:57 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > An ENABLE switch does more than just disabling the run-at-boot state of > an initscript. While I can buy the argument that some packages should > not start *at boot* by default, The problem is not just at boot, but also when pacakges are insta