On 2012-09-07 21:11:51 -0500 (-0500), Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> That is what tab completion is for.
Granted, but you still have to remember what you're tab-completing,
and tab completion is a bit of a moving target as you add other
packages which install things with somewhat similar names in your
p
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:33 PM, The Fungi wrote:
> On 2012-09-07 16:40:07 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
> [...]
>> The problem is that the software is called wallet, both the
>> software itself and the primary client binary that users invoke.
>> [...] I don't think there's another UNIX/Linux
On 2012-09-07 16:40:07 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
> The problem is that the software is called wallet, both the
> software itself and the primary client binary that users invoke.
> [...] I don't think there's another UNIX/Linux binary of that
> name. But, of course, it's still not a
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Fri 07 Sep 2012 21:45:54 Russ Allbery escribió:
> > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
> > > If you go for changing the name, kerberos-wallet or krb-wallet seems
> > > quite right.
> >
> > It's a reasonable idea for the
On Fri 07 Sep 2012 21:45:54 Russ Allbery escribió:
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
> > If you go for changing the name, kerberos-wallet or krb-wallet seems
> > quite right.
>
> It's a reasonable idea for the current implementation, but I'd rather not
> use that either because the pr
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
> If you go for changing the name, kerberos-wallet or krb-wallet seems quite
> right.
It's a reasonable idea for the current implementation, but I'd rather not
use that either because the protocol was designed to not require Kerberos.
It currently is
On Fri 07 Sep 2012 20:40:07 Russ Allbery escribió:
[snip]
> The second question is: if I should rename it, what should I call it?
> Does anyone have any suggestions that are more unique but that still
> preserve the property of being a reasonably easy-to-remember command-line
> tool for unsophistic
Hello all,
Given that this has been keeping me from packaging for Debian some
software I developed at Stanford, and I'm getting more requests for
packages, I will try to get past my mixed feelings of obstinance and guilt
and just ask for advice or help. :)
In 2007, to replace our legacy Kerberos
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joey Hess
* Package name: haskell-network-info
* URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/package/network-info
* License : BSD
Description : listing network interfaces in Haskell
Another library I use in git-annex.
--
see shy jo
I sent that E-Mail 2012-08-10 and I still haven't got any answer.
Hence, it is obvious and evident that Debian-developer is MIA. Please,
follow your own protocols to handle the situation. I think I did what
I must do, already.
P.S: I do not subscribe to mailing-list of Debian.
- Forwarded me
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:17:52PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I've previously requested that various user-facing references to
> > 'i386' and 'amd64' should be changed to the hopefully more
> > understandable '32-bit PC' and '64-bit PC', with some
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:17:52PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> I've previously requested that various user-facing references to
> 'i386' and 'amd64' should be changed to the hopefully more
> understandable '32-bit PC' and '64-bit PC', with some success. Please
> could the publicity t
Charles Plessy writes ("Re: Files-Excluded field and security implications of
uscan and debian/copyright."):
> Le Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 08:44:36AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> > in the case of the Files-Excluded field, the contents of the field
> > are directly executed.
>
> I mean: the conte
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xiangfu Liu
* Package name: fpgatools
Version : 201209
Upstream Author : Wolfgang Spraul
* URL : https://github.com/Wolfgang-Spraul/fpgatools
* License : UNLICENSE
Programming Lang: C
Description : A small indepe
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:11:25AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Subject: Re: Bug#686903: RFP: pass -- the standard unix password manager
I realise this text comes from upstream, but "the standard unix password
manager" is IMHO misleading for this program. "A unix password manager" is more
ac
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 05:18:57PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I also considered, but the information of what files are excluded when
> creating
> the Debian source package is not relevant to upstream.
>
> More simply, I think that if debian/watch would radically change its format to
> YAML or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Franzl
* Package name: libdlo
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Greg Kroah-Hartman
* URL : http://libdlo.freedesktop.org/wiki/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
Description : This is the official Displ
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ole Streicher
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: casacore
Version : 1.5.0
Upstream Author : ATNF, Syndey and ASTRON, Dwingeloo
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/casacore/
18 matches
Mail list logo
