Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dima Kogan
* Package name: liblbfgs
Version : 1.10
Upstream Author : Naoaki Okazaki
* URL : http://www.chokkan.org/software/liblbfgs/index.html
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : L-BFGS solver for d
Hi,
On 01.11.2012 00:16, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> It's not that common to encounter maintainer's with this kind of
> unproductive attitude, but when it does happen it seems to occur
> rather often in important packages. Thus, we should really have a
> documented guideline for these cases. The go
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:32:40AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
>> How to solve the following problem: Assume a package with wishlist bugs
>> filed lagging behind upstream and the maintainer refuses to package any
>> newer upstream, not even in
* Andreas Tille [121031 09:43]:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:04:23AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > Who of us never put some unimportant bug that would need some longer
> > investigating in a row to make sure it is actually not a bug and
> > forgot to post a little note of "will look into this
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:32:40AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> How to solve the following problem: Assume a package with wishlist bugs
> filed lagging behind upstream and the maintainer refuses to package any
> newer upstream, not even into experimental. And in general there is an
> interest (fr
Svante Signell writes:
> How to solve the following problem: Assume a package with wishlist bugs
> filed lagging behind upstream and the maintainer refuses to package any
> newer upstream, not even into experimental. And in general there is an
> interest (from several people) in having the new up
OLÁ, VENHO ATRAVÉS DESTE E-MAIL APRESENTAR O DATA STUDIO:
PARA CONSULTAS DE ORÇAMENTOS DE JINGLES, SPOTS, VINHETAS, LOCUÇÕES E TAMBÉM
CONVERSÃO DE VINIL E CASSETE PARA CD E VHS PARA DVD, BASTA ENTRAR EM CONTATO
POR ESTE E-MAIL OU PELO SITE.
QUEM TIVER INTERESSE TENHO UM PORTIFÓLIO DE AUDIO NO EN
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: maven-source-plugin
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-source-plugin
* Licen
Andreas Tille writes ("Re: [PROPOSAL v2] Orphaning another maintainer's
packages"):
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:30:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Consider the case where a maintainer objects. In that case you're
> > counting in the previous "long waiting" time a period which the
> > orphaner
]] Svante Signell
> How to solve the following problem: Assume a package with wishlist
> bugs filed lagging behind upstream and the maintainer refuses to
> package any newer upstream, not even into experimental. And in general
> there is an interest (from several people) in having the new upstrea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Praveen Arimbrathodiyil
* Package name: ruby-httpauth
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Manfred Stienstra
* URL : https://github.com/Manfred/HTTPauth
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Ruby li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Sébastien Villemot"
* Package name: julia
Version : 0.0.0+100592008.r1c28
Upstream Author : julia-...@googlegroups.com
* URL : http://julialang.org
* License : GPL-2+, MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : high-l
Hi Andrej (2012.10.29_17:18:41_+0200)
> >The -dbgsym packages are only generated in primary archive builds.
>
> I'm sorry to disappoint you about the Ubuntu PPAs but look into my
> PPA - https://launchpad.net/~andrej-rep/+archive/ppa/+packages - to see
> all those dbg packages. And users were
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:32:40AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> How to solve the following problem: Assume a package with wishlist bugs
> filed lagging behind upstream and the maintainer refuses to package any
> newer upstream, not even into experimental. And in general there is an
> interest
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:04:23AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > I keep on thinking that we are talking about different packages. If a
> > maintainer is "simply feels that the packages didn't need any attention"
> > these are not packages which are for instance:
> >
> > - lagging *way* beh
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 09:04 +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Andreas Tille [121031 08:06]:
> > > Consider the case where a maintainer objects. In that case you're
> > > counting in the previous "long waiting" time a period which the
> > > orphaner probably thinks shows disinterest in the packag
* Andreas Tille [121031 08:06]:
> > Consider the case where a maintainer objects. In that case you're
> > counting in the previous "long waiting" time a period which the
> > orphaner probably thinks shows disinterest in the package, but during
> > which the maintainer may well feel (for part of t
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Unless we're having some heavyweight process with multiple pings
>> etc. (which we IMO shouldn't) the way the maintainer might first
>> discover that someone feels the package needs to be orphaned is by the
>> ITO bug. The maintainer needs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neutron Soutmun
* Package name: libcouchbase
Version : 2.0.0~beta2
Upstream Author : Couchbase, Inc.
* URL : http://www.couchbase.com/develop/c/current
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : C
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:30:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Consider the case where a maintainer objects. In that case you're
> counting in the previous "long waiting" time a period which the
> orphaner probably thinks shows disinterest in the package, but during
> which the maintainer may w
20 matches
Mail list logo
