On 01/05/2013 09:50 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> Please check out these links if you want to make this happen. Probably
> an initial target of supporting oldstable for the same length of time
> as stable (instead of just a year) is a good first goal to achieve
> before adding more supported suites.
I a
On 01/05/2013 01:28 AM, alberto fuentes wrote:
> The few people on the list seems happy with it. If this is working
> well, it needs a little more love on debian.org and a 'testing-cut'
> link in the repos pointing to latest cut, so it can be set on
> sources.list and forgotten
Yes, we need to adv
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Slightly different approach: However, for serious server deployments we in
> Debian might want to think about supporting older releases a little longer
> than atm.
>
> A scheme like
>
> veryoldstable -> oldstable -> stable -> testing -> unsta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.or.jp
Package name: unidic-mecab
Version: 2.1.1
Upstream Author: The UniDic Consortium
URL: http://sourceforge.jp/projects/unidic/
License: B
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:09:42PM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Alberto, hi all,
Hi Mike
>
> On Do 03 Jan 2013 19:18:27 CET alberto fuentes wrote:
>
> >Ubuntu has done some poor decisions but it has done some other that are
> >okay. We should consider merging some of them back.
> >Im thinkin
What is the defference:
1. Insert a new stage between "stable" and "testing"
and
2. double the period of automatic migration from "unstable" to "testing"?
m? :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: libnxt
Version: 0.3
Upstream Author: David Anderson
URL: http://code.google.com/p/libnxt/
License: GPL
Description:
LibNXT is an utility library for talking to the LEGO M
Hi Alberto, hi all,
On Do 03 Jan 2013 19:18:27 CET alberto fuentes wrote:
Ubuntu has done some poor decisions but it has done some other that are
okay. We should consider merging some of them back.
Im thinking about the 6 months release thing. Without further ado, here's
the proposal pre-draft:
Ping..
Can somebody from the XMPP or maintainers take a look at the package?
https://mentors.debian.net/package/jabberd2
Thanks,
Willem
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 14:16 +0100, Willem van den Akker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cleaned up the code a little bit. Solved a bunch of lintian
> warnings.
> I tri
Im adding the cut-team to the loop. Original message:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/01/msg00082.html
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
wrote:
> AFAIK there is already an ongoing effort to provide an usable updated
> rolling release of Debian.
>
> http://joeyh.
On 01/04/2013 09:15 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Le vendredi 4 janvier 2013 05:44:57, The Wanderer a écrit :
That doesn't seem to match my experience.
I most commonly encounter apt-listbugs bug lists via 'apt-get
dist-upgrade'. If I say "no" in response to the list of bugs, and then run
'apt
Le vendredi 4 janvier 2013 05:44:57, The Wanderer a écrit :
>
> That doesn't seem to match my experience.
>
> I most commonly encounter apt-listbugs bug lists via 'apt-get
> dist-upgrade'. If I say "no" in response to the list of bugs, and then run
> 'apt-get dist-upgrade' again, I see the same l
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> On 2013-01-03 08:41, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:05:46PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
- Private dependencies, as they leak to rdeps. When a li
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:59:49PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> dpkg --add-architecture i386
> apt-get update
>
> The installer doesn't AFAIK provide even the option to do this. (The
> i386/amd64 installer images might at least be usable as multiarch APT
> sources though.) So this is a
14 matches
Mail list logo
