On 04/23/2013 11:48 AM, Laszlo Kajan wrote:
> Dear Russ, Debian Med Team, Charles!
>
> (Please keep Tobias Hamp in replies.)
>
> @Russ: Please allow me to include you in a discussion about a few
> bioinformatics packages that depend on big, but free data [2]. I have cited
> your opinion [3] in th
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2013-04-23
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Mizyrycki
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : lxc-docker
Version : 0.1.8
Upstream Author : dotCloud Inc
* URL : http://github.com/dotcloud/docker
* License : Apache-2.0
Description : Docker:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 19:23:50 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > As of Linux kernel 3.9, support for supplying early firmware data to the
> > kernel has been added. Currently, it is used for early microcode updates
> > for Intel processors
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexandre Dantas
* Package name: nsnake
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Alexandre Dantas
* URL : http://www.alexdantas.net/projects/nsnake/
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: C
Description : classic snake game w
* Joao Eriberto Mota Filho [Mon Apr 22, 2013 at 01:57:16PM -0300]:
> * Package name: ms-sys
> Version : 2.3.0
> Upstream Author : Henrik Carlqvist
> * URL : http://ms-sys.sf.net
> * License : GPL2
> Programming Lang: C
> Description : writes Microsoft c
Joachim Breitner writes:
> sounds good in theory, but in practice, when I want to upgrade foo,
> which happens to have a new dependency on bar, which needs baz, which
> needs qux, then I really want to get this done in one rush, and not wait
> for three NEW processings in between.
I go through t
Laszlo Kajan writes:
> On 23/04/13 18:48, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Discussing it on debian-devel seems right, but I would also draw it to
>> ftp-master's attention, since they're the people who have to worry
>> about archive size). We can easily move on to modifying Policy if
>> there's a consensu
Dear Russ!
Thank you for getting back to me.
On 23/04/13 18:48, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Laszlo Kajan writes:
>
>> This email is to continue the discussion about free packages that depend
>> on big (e.g. >400MB) free data outside 'main'. These packages apparently
>> violate policy 2.2.1 [0] for in
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 15:15 + schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> So, normally, you can only upload a new version of foo after bar gets
> available on your regular mirror. (Making it temporarily available
> locally for development is, of course, okay – just don’t upload that.)
sounds good i
Hello Benjamin!
On 23/04/13 15:13, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 13:51 +0200 schrieb Laszlo Kajan:
>> Hello Andreas!
>>
>> On 23/04/13 12:23, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:48:05AM +0200, Laszlo Kajan wrote:
This email is to continue the discus
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Chopin
Control: block 705947 by -1
* Package name: grapefruit
Version : 0.1~a3
Upstream Author : Xavier Basty
* URL : https://github.com/xav/Grapefruit
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 19:23:50 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> As of Linux kernel 3.9, support for supplying early firmware data to the
> kernel has been added. Currently, it is used for early microcode updates
> for Intel processors, and ACPI table overrides.
>
> This is a very im
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: libstring-diff-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Kazuhiro Osawa
* URL : https://github.com/yappo/p5-String-Diff/tree
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Descript
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dominique Dumont
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libxxx-perl
Version : 0.18
Upstream Author : Ingy d�t Net
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/XXX/
* License : Ar
Laszlo Kajan writes:
> This email is to continue the discussion about free packages that depend
> on big (e.g. >400MB) free data outside 'main'. These packages apparently
> violate policy 2.2.1 [0] for inclusion in 'main' because they require
> software outside the 'main' area to function. They d
Joachim Breitner debian.org> writes:
> The (luxury) problem is that I got used to it and began uploading the
> new (and NEW) dependency bar of package foo along with the new version
> of foo (instead of uploading bar first, wait for NEW processing and only
I think you shouldn’t do that anyway.
On 23/04/13 15:27, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> Re-name (regular expression (re)name) is a tool to rename files. It can
> change, lowercase and uppercase a batch of files, or modify their ownership.
Is this significantly better than the rename(1) (aka prename(1)) tool
that's supplied with P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
* Package name: re-name
Version : 1.99.2
Upstream Author : Andy Xuming
* URL : http://rename.sf.net
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: C
Description : mass rename tool using regular expre
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Georges Khaznadar
* Package name: grr
Version : 1.9.7e
Upstream Author : Laurent Delineau
* URL : http://grr.mutualibre.org/
* License : GPL-2.0
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : web-based resource reservation
Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 13:51 +0200 schrieb Laszlo Kajan:
> Hello Andreas!
>
> On 23/04/13 12:23, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:48:05AM +0200, Laszlo Kajan wrote:
> >>
> >> This email is to continue the discussion about free packages that
> >> depend on big (e.g. >400MB)
On 2013-04-23 14:23:57 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:53:05AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > On 2013-04-18, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > >> Oh, that's a good point. Yes, I hadn't thought about that specific case
> > >> for testing ABI breakage in experimental.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:09:49AM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:50:37 Holger Levsen wrote:
> > ah! thanks for summarizing why this is not a bug, but rather a feature
> > (UUIDs
> > for partitions) made for this situation not being used!
>
> For the record about a year ag
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:46:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:28:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > % ls -lh debian/rules
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 mrvn users 1 Apr 16 12:27 debian/rules -> /us
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:53:05AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2013-04-18, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Oh, that's a good point. Yes, I hadn't thought about that specific case
> >> for testing ABI breakage in experimental.
> >
> > But then that simply is a broken upload. It will break hor
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:16:11PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:56:34AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:28:23PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Niko Tyni writes:
> > >
> > > > FWIW, I've done ABI-incompatible uploads of perl to experiment
Hello Andreas!
On 23/04/13 12:23, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:48:05AM +0200, Laszlo Kajan wrote:
>>
>> This email is to continue the discussion about free packages that depend on
>> big (e.g. >400MB) free data outside 'main'.
>
> In your practical case is this data say <500
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:58:33PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > But for new packages, where Canonical is striking out on its own
> > to deliver significant new functionality and the folks working on these
> > packages are not DDs, there's a clear pragmatic a
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:48:05AM +0200, Laszlo Kajan wrote:
>
> This email is to continue the discussion about free packages that depend on
> big (e.g. >400MB) free data outside 'main'.
In your practical case is this data say <500MB? Are we talking about
compressed or uncompressed data (= >40
Dear Russ, Debian Med Team, Charles!
(Please keep Tobias Hamp in replies.)
@Russ: Please allow me to include you in a discussion about a few
bioinformatics packages that depend on big, but free data [2]. I have cited
your opinion [3] in this discussion before. You are on the technical committee
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 general
Bug #705982 [unknown] Wireless connection drops and will NOT re-connect --
Debian/Wheezy RC1 64 bit
Warning: Unknown package 'unknown'
Bug reassigned from package 'unknown' to 'general'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #705982 to
30 matches
Mail list logo
