On 2013-07-05 17:38, Uoti Urpala wrote:
The reason I replied wasn't so much to comment on the historical
licensing of the kernel (it's old enough to not matter much now
anyway),
but to comment on the legal argument that was the core of Linus's post
you linked to. He claimed that including the c
Control: severity 715110 normal
Control: severity 715122 normal
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 05:01:15AM +, David Steele wrote:
> Package: libsamba-util-dev
> Version: 4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts, broken-symlink, broken-symlink-sh
Hi!
Adobe has handed the responsability of maintaining its Flash Player for
Linux to Google who has ported it from NPAPI to PPAPI (also known as
Pepper Plugin API). This API is cross-platform but currently only
supported by Chrome/Chromium. Firefox has no plan to support
it.
While Google Chrome i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-requestbuilder
Version : 0.1.0~beta2
Upstream Author : Garrett Holmstrom
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/requestbuilder
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On 2013-07-04 10:04, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Stefano Zacchiroli:
I mean, sure, it *is* more tricky to provide such a URL for users that
will be running a *modified* version of INN. But it is exactly the
same
kind of difficulties that people distributing modified copylefted
software will have t
Hi,
Le 05/07/2013 21:11, Johannes Schauer a écrit :
> Description : Display, edit and render 3D LEGO(R) LDraw models
Debian is about free software, not about enforcing any other trademarks.
Please, drop the useless “(R)” from the descriptions.
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Johannes Schauer
* Package name: ldglite
Version : 1.2.6
Upstream Author : Don Heyse
* URL : http://ldglite.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Display, edit and render 3D LEGO(R)
David Weinehall wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 04:14:57PM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> [snip]
> > a post from Alan Cox explaining this. I don't see why you would post
> > your link again in full quote after that without explaining why you
> > still thought Linus wasn't wrong.
>
> I posted it full
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:24:42AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > What do you do when you are on a network that blocks DNS lookups that
> > don't go via the DNS servers for that network? Or for networks that do
> > that until you visit a web page and press a button on a form?
>
> Manually recon
Sorry for the noise,
I finally verified some more claims and discovered that my other recent
mail is wrong in multiple places. I guess this discussion really is
moot.
So what happens when you getaddrinfo ...
... a non-existent name? -> EAI_SYSTEM ENOENT
... something when nothing is bound to po
Svante Signell writes:
> On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 16:14 +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
>> David Weinehall wrote:
>> > OK, I'll instead quote what Linus wrote in the link I posted:
>>
>> >The "version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later
>> >version" language in the GPL copying file is
> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 15:09:51 +0800
> Subject: Re: Bug#653813: ITP: edgar -- The Legend of Edgar platform game
> From: p...@debian.org
> To: rikswee...@hotmail.com
> CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org; 653...@bugs.debian.org
>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Richard Sweeney wrote:
>
> >
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 12:03:47PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> That resolvconf leaves resolv.conf empty of "nameserver" entries when
> no nameservers are available is intentional. The idea is to advertise
> only addresses where something is actually listening.
Even though intentional it might be
On 07/05/2013 12:24 PM, David Weinehall wrote:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 04:14:57PM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
[snip]
a post from Alan Cox explaining this. I don't see why you would
post your link again in full quote after that without explaining
why you still thought Linus wasn't wrong.
I pos
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 04:14:57PM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
[snip]
> a post from Alan Cox explaining this. I don't see why you would post
> your link again in full quote after that without explaining why you
> still thought Linus wasn't wrong.
I posted it fully because the parent I responded to s
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 16:31 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 04:28:13PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 16:14 +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> > Since this discussion took place in 2006, the Linux as a whole would
> > probably be too old to be interst
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 04:28:13PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 16:14 +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> Since this discussion took place in 2006, the Linux as a whole would
> probably be too old to be intersting. However, there are big chunks of
> current code having the 'or
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 16:14 +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> David Weinehall wrote:
> > OK, I'll instead quote what Linus wrote in the link I posted:
>
> > The "version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later
> > version" language in the GPL copying file is not - and has never
> > b
David Weinehall wrote:
> OK, I'll instead quote what Linus wrote in the link I posted:
> The "version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later
> version" language in the GPL copying file is not - and has never
> been - part of the actual License itself. It's part of the
A
On 07/05/2013 02:07 PM, David Weinehall wrote:
So, that's Linus's stand on whether or not a GPLv3 kernel is feasible.
I hope this totally pointless thread can die now.
Thanks for extracting the relevant parts. I guess I was just way too
tired yesterday to start diving into the posting on LKML :
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 01:08:27AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 07/05/2013 12:58 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >* David Weinehall , 2013-07-04, 16:36:
> >>http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/25/273
> >
> >http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/30/100
>
> Could you be a bit more elaborate please? I don't th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: django-colorful
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Simon Charette
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-colorful
* License : MIT
Pro
This is now documented at
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/VerboseBuildLogs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51d6afef.8060...@debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Johannes Schauer
* Package name: ldraw-parts
Version : 1203
Upstream Author : LDraw.org and others (see debian/copyright)
* URL : http://www.ldraw.org/parts/latest-parts.html
* License : CCAL-2.0
Programming Lang: C
D
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> We could keep libdb-dev for the fork keeping the current license and create
> a new set of development packages like libdb6-dev for the AGPLv3 code
> with or without switching to an upstream different from Oracle.
>
And if you read the threa
2013/7/5 Andreas Tille
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 04:10:17PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > Le 3 juil. 2013 14:50, "José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez" <
> jredr...@debian.org>
> > a écrit :
> > >
> > > I've been maintaining qucs since 2004 to 2012, so I know this package
> > pretty well and
Tad Frank wrote:
> Your issue lies in the line: sed -e "s/$REGISTERED_IP/$CURRENT_IP/g"
> /etc/hosts > /etc/hosts.new
I searched debian-devel for the message to which you are responding;
the most recent message with that subject header dates from December 1999.
Yes, people were dynamically updat
Subject: ITP: hunspell-br -- Breton language dictionary for hunspell
Package: wnpp
Owner: Elie Roux
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: hunspell-br
Version : 0.11
Upstream Author : Philippe Basciano-Le Gall
* URL : http://www.drouizig.org
* License : GPLv2, LGP
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Richard Sweeney wrote:
> I'm currently replacing the music and sound effects in The Legend of Edgar
> with media from opengameart.org. Currently, the media I'm using have the
> following licences
>
> CC-BY 3.0
> CC-BY-SA 3.0
> GPL 3.0
>
> Are these licences OK for D
Hi,
I'm currently replacing the music and sound effects in The Legend of Edgar with
media from opengameart.org. Currently, the media I'm using have the following
licences
CC-BY 3.0
CC-BY-SA 3.0
GPL 3.0
Are these licences OK for Debian, or will the GPL 3.0 be an issue? I couldn't
really find a
30 matches
Mail list logo
