Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Ondřej Surý
Funny thing, the people who are undermining the Debian processes most loudly are not even Debian Developers and thus they are not bound by them. I am tired of this recurring flamewar, please stop it and let the tech-ctte do their job. This is not a democracy any more, but the loudiestcracy. O.

Re: away_0.9.5+ds-0+nmu2_multi.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-10-26 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 06:57:50AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: The usefulness of supporting --as-needed isn't because of Ubuntu. It's because switching --as-needed on across the board I think it would be better send all our upstreams patches for their build systems than to work around

Re: Proposal: s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, October 26, 2013 07:57:50 Uoti Urpala wrote: Scott Kitterman wrote: Unless there's some kind of disclosure policy for everyone involved in the any technical discussion around Debian, CTTE decisions are quite distinct from any technical discussion. I think it's silly to

Re: Proposal: s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 07:57:50AM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote: I don't have anything against Colin Watson, and have nothing in particular to complain about in his reply concerning the conflict of interest. But I don't think there really is much he could even theoretically say to fully remove

Re: [debian-mysql] MySQL.. no.. _I_ need your help!

2013-10-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I would like to help in some capacity. Would working in a chrooted environment or would one need a fully fledged os? On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Clint Byrum spam...@debian.org wrote: Greetings earthlings, As some of you may know, I've been doing the bulk of the package maintenance on

Re: Proposal: s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 07:57:50 +0300 Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi wrote: I am no longer willing to assume that Steve Langasek would act in good faith in evaluating init systems; he has posted false claims about systemd too many times for me to believe they would all be honest mistakes,

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:03:38PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Let’s GR it. No. I think I've already argued in the past against this idea on -devel, possibly even in reply to you, Thorsten. As I can't find my post back then, let me reiterate. GRs should be used for societal and policy[*]

Re: Please assume good faith (was Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME)

2013-10-26 Thread Chris Bannister
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:00:42PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: On Do, 24 Okt 2013, Charles Plessy wrote: at this point, I would like to point at a very important part of the revised code of conduct that Wouter is proposing: Assume good faith. On Do, 24 Okt 2013, Adam Borowski wrote:

Bug#727754: New security-aware-resolver virtual package.

2013-10-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.9.4 Severity: wishlist Le Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:28:32AM +0200, Ondřej Surý a écrit : Hi James, since the authoritative-name-server idea was rejected by the list, I was going to propose alternative: security-aware-resolver The definition from RFC4033:

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Martin Wuertele
* Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi [2013-10-25 18:27]: Steve Langasek has been consistently posting dishonest FUD against systemd. Maybe you could explain that as excessive zeal following from valid technical considerations, but I'd consider that an excessively charitable interpretation

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-26 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 25/10/13 at 12:16 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: In response to the recent threads, I'd like to ask the tech-ctte to please vote on and decide on the default init system for Debian. I agree. I don't think that many substantial new arguments are going to be brought by waiting more on this

Bug#727757: ITP: ruby-mizuho -- Mizuho documentation formatting tool

2013-10-26 Thread Felix Geyer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Felix Geyer fge...@debian.org * Package name: ruby-mizuho Version : 0.9.19 Upstream Author : Hongli Lai * URL : https://github.com/FooBarWidget/mizuho * License : Expat Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Mizuho

Bug#727759: ITP: websocket-client -- WebSocket client library for python

2013-10-26 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicolas Dandrimont ol...@debian.org * Package name: websocket-client Version : 0.12.0 Upstream Author : liris liris...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/liris/websocket-client * License : LGPL-2.1+ Programming Lang:

gnucash dependencies (was Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce)

2013-10-26 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:19:53AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: I have Gnucash installed and it depends on udisks, trust me I have absolutely no need for udisks or polkit, so don't be so sure (I am not saying that I am sure that he is not). gnucash → libgnome2-0 → gvfs → gvfs-daemons → libgdu0

Re: gnucash dependencies (was Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce)

2013-10-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 26/10/13 12:02, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:19:53AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: I have Gnucash installed and it depends on udisks, trust me I have absolutely no need for udisks or polkit, so don't be so sure (I am not saying that I am sure that he is not). gnucash

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Steve McIntyre
Zack wrote: Note that the *possibility* of taking technical decisions by GRs is important, as it provides a balance of powers within the project, but we should always do everything in our power to avoid doing that. The decisions about the init system (both which are the supported ones? and which

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Chris Bannister
[Please don't top post on this mailing list!] On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 06:45:02PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote: And just bashing GNOME DE for systemd and GNOME Classic is not good enough point because probably the largest user base of Debian user use GNOME. That is because it is installed by

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:58:34 -0700 Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes: If someone comes up with good reasons to consider systemd on it's own merit, I'm willing to consider it. With the current approach of a fait-accompli systemd is part of the

Re: gnucash dependencies (was Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce)

2013-10-26 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le samedi 26 octobre 2013 à 13:03 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : On 26/10/13 12:02, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:19:53AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: I have Gnucash installed and it depends on udisks, trust me I have absolutely no need for udisks or polkit, so

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On 26 Oct 2013, at 13:00, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote: Desktop components cannot dictate how the rest of the system operates. The gnome folks are free to do what they please. They don't answer to us and your repeated assertions that they're crossing a line just shine a light

Re: Please assume good faith (was Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME)

2013-10-26 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:02:00AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: I'm fed up with repeated attempts to force components on the rest of the system, but that's mostly a fault of Gnome's upstream There seems to be a trend emanating from packages involving RedHat devs. I actually went to the

Re: gnucash dependencies (was Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce)

2013-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2013-10-26 13:03:13) On 26/10/13 12:02, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:19:53AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: I have Gnucash installed and it depends on udisks, trust me I have absolutely no need for udisks or polkit, so don't be so sure (I am

Re: gnucash dependencies (was Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce)

2013-10-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 26/10/13 16:38, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2013-10-26 13:03:13) On 26/10/13 12:02, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:19:53AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: I have Gnucash installed and it depends on udisks, trust me I have absolutely no need for

Re: MySQL.. no.. _I_ need your help!

2013-10-26 Thread Patrick Galbraith
Clint - perhaps you and I can talk about this in Hong Kong? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5f7ce033-3ae0-4c17-8356-a31015a72...@patg.net

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:44:48PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: Andy Cater wrote: I think it would be a good idea to have the netinst have an additional option to select desktop easily including the option for command line only, no graphical desktop as default. We already have that option

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote: On one hand, the belief that every DD is technically omniscient is the reason why we still have so many pointlessly heated debates on this mailing list. We would have way less of those if we let only people who have a

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Enrico Tassi
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:09:45PM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote: Steve Langasek has been consistently posting dishonest FUD against systemd. Maybe you could explain that as excessive zeal following from valid technical considerations, but I'd consider that an excessively charitable interpretation

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On 26 Oct 2013, at 16:08, Andrew M.A. Cater amaca...@galactic.demon.co.uk wrote: That wouldbe my preference - a tasksel change for no desktop KDE GNOME LXDE XFCE etc. for the netinst - default being no desktop - ideal for a minimum install. I don't understand how that would work: I

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 10:00 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: GRs should be used for societal and policy[*] decisions. Using GRs for *technical* decision is stupid. Is it for sure that this (and I guess it's mostly about upstart vs. systemd is *only* a technical question? - Apparently both are

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 04:37:55PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: [...] non-Linux UNIX flavours - which I think Debian should support for ethical and philosophical reasons. Uh-oh. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net writes: On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 10:00 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: GRs should be used for societal and policy[*] decisions. Using GRs for *technical* decision is stupid. Is it for sure that this (and I guess it's mostly about upstart vs.

Jessie release goal: DNSSEC as default recursive resolver

2013-10-26 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, I'd find it very nice if we had, by default, DNSSEC resolving in Debian, at least in the default configuration (whatever that means). By this, I mean that any non-experienced user would just install (or upgrade to) Jessie, start a web browser (Chormium, Iceweasel, etc.: take your pick...),

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Ondřej Surý
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013, at 16:37, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 10:00 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: GRs should be used for societal and policy[*] decisions. Using GRs for *technical* decision is stupid. Is it for sure that this (and I guess it's mostly about upstart

Re: Jessie release goal: DNSSEC as default recursive resolver

2013-10-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes: If this means installing a recursive DNS resolver by default (unbound pops to my mind, since it has the feature by default), I'd say be it, though probably that is more of an open question, and an implementation details. I personally wouldn't mind at all

Re: Proposal: switch init system to systemd or upstart

2013-10-26 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 08:34 +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote: Brian May wrote: As much as I would like to see systemd as the default in Debian (and have switched to it on my Desktops), I see two show stopper issues: * Needs to work (somehow) with other applications (including not in

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
Of course, the gnome default makes adding gnome to the plot not currently useful. One nice side benefit of at least temporarily switching the default desktop to xfce would be that if a lot of people wanted gnome, rather than just picking it as the default, we'd see that reflected in the

Pro-Action against dependency hell

2013-10-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
What can be done to prevent rather than reacting to dependency hell all the time. Some developers obviously get it and yet others seem to pro-actively work in the other direction. There was a time when it was said that this problem was finally heading in the right direction. There is an example

Re: Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

2013-10-26 Thread Richard Hartmann
Off list. Thanks! Richard

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 04:41:00PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On 26 Oct 2013, at 16:08, Andrew M.A. Cater amaca...@galactic.demon.co.uk wrote: That wouldbe my preference - a tasksel change for no desktop KDE GNOME LXDE XFCE etc. for the netinst - default being no desktop -

Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME

2013-10-26 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 23:42 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 23:06 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: And does this cause any problems actually? Does your system no longer boot properly using sysvinit when systemd is installed? Well, gdm3 does not start for a new

Re: let's split the systemd binary package

2013-10-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
Session tracking includes suspending/hibernating, because logind has a mechanism to let apps delay suspend, which is necessary for things like closing the inherent race condition in lock the screensaver when we suspend... oh, oops, it didn't get scheduled until after we resumed, so the old

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
Steve Langasek has been consistently posting dishonest FUD against systemd. Maybe you could explain that as excessive zeal following from valid technical considerations, but I'd consider that an excessively charitable interpretation for a member of a body that is supposed to have public

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
I recommend one more option, nicknamed rotten tomatoes, that basically says that this GR should never have been proposed. And even more so not listened to for a few reasons. Little has changed since the last discussion that I feel came to a reasonable current standing with an overview

Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME

2013-10-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
But that alone is not an argument against introducing new technologies. One just has to be careful in what is done. Not against new technologies in general but if you are talking about something which you expect every Linux user to use (when actually they can't in deep embedded etc.) then yes

Re: Proposal: switch init system to systemd or upstart

2013-10-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
My understanding is that the _kernel_ side wants to change the cgroup API, and this means that at least in the long term current cgroup-using applications will need to change in any case (possibly by using systemd APIs instead). I'm not familiar with the specific case of lxc, but I really

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
systemd doing more is quite relevant for this decision as far as I understand the discussion: unlike upstart, systemd is not just an init replacement, but offers additional services like journald or logind. I don't mean to be rude but please read up on systemd and see the pros of cons such as

Re: Jessie release goal: DNSSEC as default recursive resolver

2013-10-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
If I'm not mistaking (please correct me), Fedora has the feature, and it's been a long time they do. FreeBSD as well (they have unbound in the default installer). OpenBSD also removed bind and switched to unbound (or at least is planning on doing it, I'm not sure). Debian shouldn't be left

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:07:36AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I think that there are two different questions: 1) Could you clarify which init system(s) must be supported by packages involved during system startup (daemons, etc.) and low-level services? [ the answer to that

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes: I don't think either of these are the right question. Even if we change the default init system for jessie, because we *must* support backwards compatibility with sysvinit for upgrades, there is no justification for requiring packages to do anything

Re: Jessie release goal: DNSSEC as default recursive resolver

2013-10-26 Thread Ondřej Surý
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013, at 18:58, Kevin Chadwick wrote: I believe the reliability (DOS) issues that DNSSEC imposes coupled with Please, not this again. If you say DNSSEC DOS issue, you must state all the other issues that DNS has. the low level of adoption It's certainly more adopted than IPv6

Re: Jessie release goal: DNSSEC as default recursive resolver

2013-10-26 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi Russ, On Sat, Oct 26, 2013, at 18:20, Russ Allbery wrote: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes: If this means installing a recursive DNS resolver by default (unbound pops to my mind, since it has the feature by default), I'd say be it, though probably that is more of an open

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes: I don't think either of these are the right question. Even if we change the default init system for jessie, because we *must* support backwards compatibility with sysvinit for upgrades,

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/26/2013 10:37 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: - Against systemd speaks that it's uncertain on whether there will be a solution in the end for the non-Linux UNIX flavours - which I think Debian should support for ethical and philosophical reasons. Admittedly I have no idea how the

Re: Jessie release goal: DNSSEC as default recursive resolver

2013-10-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 26, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: I'd find it very nice if we had, by default, DNSSEC resolving in Debian, at least in the default configuration (whatever that means). By this, I agree with the general principle, but I do not think that a recursive resolver should be installed

Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)

2013-10-26 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013, Stewart Smith wrote: Jenkins can have slaves on remote hosts, via SSH. It runs a small java app there, so as long as the arch has a JVM then you're pretty right. that JVM is not even needed, just schedule jobs via ssh and be done. cheers, Holger

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 00:00 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: Pros: * CD#1 will work again without size worries * Smaller, simpler desktop * Works well/better on all supported kernels (?) * Does not depend on replacing init * Users can pick and choose components and drop

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 26, Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote: This really pinpoints the whole problem: What happened to the Unix philosophy, with freedom of choice? We killed it for good in 2008: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-January/msg00861.html -- ciao, Marco

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 26, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: If neither Upstart or Systemd works for these non-Linux ports, then there's OpenRC. Which is why I worked on it (and I did this, mainly because of ethical and philosophical reasons as you put it). It wouldn't hurt to have more help on it...

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 08:08:53 -0700, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:44:48PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: Yes, it can. It should contain enough of the packages needed to be able to support all 4 of the recognised DEs. However, at current rates it won't take long

Re: let's split the systemd binary package

2013-10-26 Thread Florian Weimer
* Simon McVittie: Session tracking includes suspending/hibernating, because logind has a mechanism to let apps delay suspend, which is necessary for things like closing the inherent race condition in lock the screensaver when we suspend... oh, oops, it didn't get scheduled until after we

Bug#727795: ITP: node-raw-body -- Request body length validation supporting streams - module for Node.js

2013-10-26 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org * Package name: node-raw-body Version : 0.0.3 Upstream Author : Jonathan Ong m...@jongleberry.com * URL : https://github.com/stream-utils/raw-body * License : Expat Programming Lang:

Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)

2013-10-26 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, (I was not able to find the debian-ports list on lists.debian.org (so I subscribed via email) did I just miss it?) Quoting Steven Chamberlain (2013-10-23 22:04:59) I had a play with the 'botch' tool (see description[1]) for determining build order when bootstrapping an architecture. botch

Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)

2013-10-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de (2013-10-26): (I was not able to find the debian-ports list on lists.debian.org (so I subscribed via email) did I just miss it?) Dead list: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ports/ AFAICT it's now an alias for all debian-$port lists. Mraw, KiBi.

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Simon McVittie
On 25/10/13 16:28, Russ Allbery wrote: Fully supporting an init system means, among other things, writing or generating native configuration files for that init system so that we can take full (or at least fuller) advantage of its capabilities. We're currently not doing that for anything

Bug#727797: ITP: node-fresh -- Check freshness of HTTP request and response headers - Node.js module

2013-10-26 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org * Package name: node-fresh Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : TJ Holowaychuk t...@vision-media.ca * URL : https://github.com/visionmedia/node-fresh * License : Expat Programming Lang:

Re: let's split the systemd binary package

2013-10-26 Thread Simon McVittie
On 26/10/13 21:23, Florian Weimer wrote: Session tracking includes suspending/hibernating, because logind has a mechanism to let apps delay suspend, which is necessary for things like closing the inherent race condition in lock the screensaver when we suspend... oh, oops, it didn't get

Bug#727798: ITP: node-range-parser -- HTTP Range header parser - Node.js module

2013-10-26 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org * Package name: node-range-parser Version : 0.0.4 Upstream Author : TJ Holowaychuk t...@vision-media.ca * URL : https://github.com/visionmedia/node-range-parser * License : Expat Programming

Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)

2013-10-26 Thread peter green
Johannes Schauer wrote: Until these two issues are fixed we will not be able to get an algorithmic answer to the question of what constitutes the minimum required set of packages. There is also the complication of what I will call non-key self building compilers. fpc is an example These

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 26, Luca Capello l...@pca.it wrote: A small note: does anyone consider that there are still people on not-so-fast Internet connections? Yes: unless they need to install multiple computers (unusual, I think) and do not know how to share the downloaded packages among them, then

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:02:13PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: # systemd units on my laptop that are generated internally by systemd # when it reads a sysvinit script (or LSB init script as it # calls them) % systemctl list-units | grep LSB | wc -l That's only currently loaded units, i.e.

Re: Proposal: s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-26 Thread Charles Plessy
On Saturday, October 26, 2013 10:45:55 Charles Plessy wrote: Conflict of interest is not a judgement on a person. It is a judgement about a situation, and a recommendation on how systematically react, without making exceptions. Le Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:31:32PM -0400, Scott Kitterman

Re: away_0.9.5+ds-0+nmu2_multi.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-10-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Colin Watson wrote: Linking in the correct order is not a workaround; it's being correct. I wasn't talking about link-order stuff but about dependency inflation; binaries linking against libraries that aren't used by the binaries linking against them. IIRC this

Re: Pro-Action against dependency hell

2013-10-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: epdfview depends on libqt epdfview has been removed from Debian but it never depended on Qt, always GTK+: http://bugs.debian.org/710550 http://packages.debian.org/source/stable/epdfview evince pulls in the whole of QT adding ages to the

Re: away_0.9.5+ds-0+nmu2_multi.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-10-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: I wasn't talking about link-order stuff but about dependency inflation; binaries linking against libraries that aren't used by the binaries linking against them. IIRC this is the purpose of --as-needed and what it works around. To clarify further, I think

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-26 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes: Please reconsider this. If I wrote a little GUI calculator and made it depend on e.g. upstart, would that also make upstart unsuitable as a default init system because of the resulting insane top-down dependency? Yes. Aeh, are you sure? I think you

Accepted mailnag 0.5.2-2 (source all)

2013-10-26 Thread Vincent Cheng
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 23:19:50 -0700 Source: mailnag Binary: mailnag Architecture: source all Version: 0.5.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com Changed-By: Vincent Cheng

Accepted polipo 1.0.4.1-4 (source i386)

2013-10-26 Thread Rolf Leggewie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:35:24 +0800 Source: polipo Binary: polipo Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.4.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Changed-By: Rolf Leggewie

Accepted libperl-critic-perl 1.120-1 (source all)

2013-10-26 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 08:42:05 +0200 Source: libperl-critic-perl Binary: libperl-critic-perl Architecture: source all Version: 1.120-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group

Accepted julia 0.2.0~rc2+dfsg-1 (source amd64 all)

2013-10-26 Thread Sébastien Villemot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:33:44 + Source: julia Binary: julia julia-doc julia-dbg Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 0.2.0~rc2+dfsg-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Julia Team

Accepted exim4 4.82~rc5-1 (source i386 all)

2013-10-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 08:50:58 +0200 Source: exim4 Binary: exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light exim4 exim4-daemon-heavy exim4-daemon-custom eximon4 exim4-dbg exim4-daemon-light-dbg exim4-daemon-heavy-dbg exim4-daemon-custom-dbg

Accepted ttt 1.7-3.4 (source amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Sergei Golovan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:40:42 +0400 Source: ttt Binary: ttt tttview tttprobe Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.7-3.4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas Scheffczyk thomas.scheffc...@verwaltung.uni-mainz.de

Accepted ergo 3.3.1-2 (source amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Michael Banck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:05:49 +0200 Source: ergo Binary: ergo Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.3.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Banck mba...@debian.org Changed-By: Michael Banck mba...@debian.org

Accepted fonts-smc 5.0.1-5 (source all)

2013-10-26 Thread Vasudev Kamath
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:43:45 +0530 Source: fonts-smc Binary: fonts-smc fonts-mlym-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 5.0.1-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian-IN Team debian-in-work...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Accepted sombok 2.3.1-2 (source amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Emmanuel Bouthenot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:07:22 + Source: sombok Binary: libsombok-dev libsombok3 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.3.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Emmanuel Bouthenot kol...@debian.org Changed-By: Emmanuel

Accepted folks 0.9.5-1 (source amd64 all)

2013-10-26 Thread Sjoerd Simons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:02:09 +0200 Source: folks Binary: libfolks25 libfolks-dev libfolks-dbg folks-common gir1.2-folks-0.6 libfolks-telepathy25 libfolks-telepathy-dev libfolks-eds25 libfolks-eds-dev libfolks-eds-dbg

Accepted bitstormlite 0.2q-4 (source amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Andrea Veri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:13:48 +0200 Source: bitstormlite Binary: bitstormlite Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.2q-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrea Veri a...@debian.org Changed-By: Andrea Veri

Accepted agg 2.5+dfsg1-9 (source amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Andrea Veri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:18:09 +0200 Source: agg Binary: libagg-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5+dfsg1-9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrea Veri a...@debian.org Changed-By: Andrea Veri a...@debian.org

Accepted gnutls28 3.2.5-1 (source i386 all)

2013-10-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:40:05 +0200 Source: gnutls28 Binary: libgnutls28-dev libgnutls28 libgnutls28-dbg gnutls-bin gnutls-doc guile-gnutls libgnutlsxx28 libgnutls-xssl0 libgnutls-openssl27 Architecture: source i386 all Version:

Accepted rsync 3.1.0-1 (source amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Paul Slootman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:19:55 +0200 Source: rsync Binary: rsync Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.1.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Paul Slootman p...@debian.org Changed-By: Paul Slootman p...@debian.org

Accepted python-cups 1.9.63-1 (source amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Jackson Doak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:17:55 +1000 Source: python-cups Binary: python-cups Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.9.63-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org Changed-By: Jackson Doak

Accepted node-topcube 0.2.0+ds1-1 (source amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Jérémy Lal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:29:48 +0200 Source: node-topcube Binary: node-topcube Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.2.0+ds1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers

Accepted system-config-printer 1.4.3-1 (source all amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Laurent Bigonville
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:58:35 +0200 Source: system-config-printer Binary: system-config-printer python-cupshelpers system-config-printer-udev Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1.4.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low

Accepted mpi-defaults 1.0.2 (source amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Sébastien Villemot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:35:29 + Source: mpi-defaults Binary: mpi-default-dev mpi-default-bin Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.0.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Accepted ufsutils 8.2-4 (source kfreebsd-amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Robert Millan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:43:08 +0200 Source: ufsutils Binary: ufsutils ufsutils-udeb Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64 Version: 8.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers debian-...@lists.debian.org

Accepted freebsd-glue 0.1.12 (source kfreebsd-amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Robert Millan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 16:09:29 +0200 Source: freebsd-glue Binary: freebsd-glue Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64 Version: 0.1.12 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers debian-...@lists.debian.org

Accepted gcr 3.10.1-1 (source all amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Sjoerd Simons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 16:48:53 +0200 Source: gcr Binary: gcr libgck-1-dev libgck-1-doc libgck-1-0 gir1.2-gck-1 libgcr-3-dev libgcr-3-doc libgcr-3-1 libgcr-base-3-1 libgcr-ui-3-1 libgcr-3-common gir1.2-gcr-3 Architecture: source all

Accepted gnome-session 3.8.4-3 (source all amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 16:12:19 +0200 Source: gnome-session Binary: gnome-session gnome-session-bin gnome-session-common Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 3.8.4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian GNOME

Accepted goffice 0.10.8-1 (source amd64 all)

2013-10-26 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:19:01 +1100 Source: goffice Binary: libgoffice-0.10-dev libgoffice-dbg libgoffice-0.10-10 libgoffice-0.10-10-common gir1.2-goffice-0.10 libgoffice-0.10-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 0.10.8-1

Accepted passportjs 0.1.17-1 (source all)

2013-10-26 Thread Jérémy Lal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 16:51:13 +0200 Source: passportjs Binary: node-passport Architecture: source all Version: 0.1.17-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers

Accepted zsh 5.0.2-6 (source all amd64)

2013-10-26 Thread Axel Beckert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:09:56 +0200 Source: zsh Binary: zsh zsh-common zsh-doc zsh-static zsh-dev zsh-dbg zsh-beta zsh-beta-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 5.0.2-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Zsh

  1   2   >