Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.11.2013, 17:50 -0800 schrieb Shawn Landden:
> * Package name: piwik
are you aware of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448532 and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506933 and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609521
Greeti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Apollon Oikonomopoulos
* Package name: python-pyst
Version : 0.6.50
Upstream Author : Ralf Schlatterbeck
* URL : http://pyst.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL, Python
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I was referring to the sysvinit program/package, which I think is made
> obsolete by OpenRC; the original SysV init scripts could still be used
> by OpenRC.
I think you’re confusing sysvinit with sysv-rc here.
This was never about the sysvinit *p
Hello,
We are inviting talks for the Desktops DevRoom at FOSDEM 2014, which will
take place in Brussels (Belgium) 1-2 February 2014. The Call for Talks is
here:
http://www.elpauer.org/2013/10/fosdem-desktops-devroom-2014-call-for-talks/
The change of the default desktop in Debian from Gnome to X
Charles Plessy writes ("How many users for /usr/bin/view ?"):
> I will most probably remove /usr/bin/view from mime-support, but
> just in case, I would like to hear if some people are strongly
> relying on it.
I just read the bug. I'm not a vi user (I use emacs or ed) so have no
personal use for
Jakub Wilk writes ("Re: debconf as a registry"):
> I suggest the following test instead:
>
> 1) DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get install $package
> 2) rm -rf /var/cache/debconf
> 3) DEBIAN_PRIORITY=low apt-get install --reinstall $package
>
> If any questions are asked in point 3, the packa
Bas Wijnen wrote:
> As I wrote, the only thing you need is to search for any package using a
> config script. Searching for db_input path:\.config$ gives for example
> cyrus-sasl2 and bind9 on the first page.
No ,any package using a config script does not use debconf in a buggy
fashion. Sheesh. A
On 28/11/13 10:57, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> I was referring to the sysvinit program/package, which I think is made
>> obsolete by OpenRC; the original SysV init scripts could still be used
>> by OpenRC.
>
> I think you’re confusing sysvinit with s
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 27.11.2013, 17:50 -0800 schrieb Shawn Landden:
>> * Package name: piwik
>
> are you aware of
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448532 and
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/11/13 21:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Architecture Status ===
>
> ia64 causes us concern for the following reasons:
>
> * binutils issues (#718047, #720404), resulting in build failures
> blocking transitions
>
> * man
On 2013-11-28 21:24, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I've found the builds on the less used architectures have been useful
> for flushing out unusual bugs, particularly when the code ships with
> many test cases and it exposes problems for big endian machines, etc.
>
> Also, kFreeBSD and HURD are both kind
I also have some old hardware around that could have problems with booting
from something other then the CD sets. But seriously...
I should have thrown in away a decade ago. Also I can by more powerful used
hardware that those (with DVD support) for a dozen of Euros.
Therefore I think that such ol
]] Niels Thykier
> However, I would not be surprised if DSA were to object to maintaining
> machines running sid.
With the (grumbling) exception of new architectures where there is
sometimes a bootstrapping problem, we want to run stable on buildds and
porter boxes, yes.
--
Tollef Fog Heen, wi
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 534 (new: 2)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 148 (new: 0)
Total number of packages request
Hi Niels,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:04:56PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> kFreeBSD was a technology preview, and has not generated enough user
> interest to bring in sufficient install base to continue in this
> state.
I wonder, how is the release team measuring this? For the other ports that
y
15 matches
Mail list logo