On 10/31/2013 09:47 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 06:33:44 +0100 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> two places where to place systemd service files. One is located
>> below /usr/lib/systemd which is the directory where service files
>> provided by the package are placed, and
On 12/23/2013 01:50 AM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Package: automysqlbackup
> Severity: wishlist
>
> MariaDB is an drop in replacement for MySQL. As MariaDB has just
> landed in Debian unstable it would be a good time to include it in the
> dependencies as an alternative to MySQL.
>
> Please change
I'm planning on requesting removal of xerces-c2 soon. xerces-c2 is for
2.x versions of Xerces-C. Version 3.0.0 was released over 5 years ago
now. I had hoped to remove xerces-c2 before the release of wheezy, but
there were too many packages that depended on it at the time. There are
now only fi
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 05:47:05PM +0100, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 02:19:36AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On 2013-12-23 13:15, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
>
> [a potentially badly-phrased question]
>
> > ...I don't think many continue to read your rant and take your
> > "fe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Felix Lechner
Package name: svxlink
Version : 13.12
Upstream Author : Tobias Blomberg
URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/svxlink/
License : GPLv2 dated June 1991, except as noted below
Programming Lang: C++
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 05:33:56PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Generally agreed, although I believe you have to be somewhat careful
> when using it in combination with dh-autoreconf
dh-autoreconf(7) says "you do not need --with=autotools_dev if you use
--with=autoreconf"
> I've been sending rathe
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013, Joey Hess wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Hmm? That's interesting, given that bug report I was cc'd (and which I later
> > cc'd you asking about the -/_ thing) complaining that dh-autotools-dev-foo
> > was not working because of that -/_ mismatch.
>
> Which I a
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Hmm? That's interesting, given that bug report I was cc'd (and which I later
> cc'd you asking about the -/_ thing) complaining that dh-autotools-dev-foo
> was not working because of that -/_ mismatch.
Which I answered the same way.
> Is the -/_ fixup a long t
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 15:15:13 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Dec 2013, Wookey wrote:
> > > 2) for dh packages:
> > > adding --with autotools-dev to the dh invocation
> >
> > This is broken. debhelper modules are not allowed
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013, Joey Hess wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Dec 2013, Wookey wrote:
> > > 2) for dh packages:
> > > adding --with autotools-dev to the dh invocation
> >
> > This is broken. debhelper modules are not allowed to use "-" in the name,
> > the correct modu
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:02:31PM +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> About the system library exception, this is what the GPL FAQ tells:
> Q: Can I link a GPL program with a proprietary system library?
> A: Both versions of the GPL have an exception to their copyleft,
> commonly called t
El Tue, 24 de Dec 2013 a las 2:03 AM, Jakub Wilk
escribió:
* Bastien ROUCARIES , 2013-12-23, 16:23:
I have just implemented lintian-privacy-breach tags [1,2]
I don't think “privacy breach” is an appropriate expression to
use here. Can we find a less judgmental and more technical term?
Per
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 02:00:05PM +, Wookey wrote:
> Every new port involves hundred of patches to packages updating
> config.sub and config.guess so that packages build on the new arch.
[...]
> Is there any reason not to make this a default behaviour? I am not aware
> of this ever causing a p
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 15:15:13 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2013, Wookey wrote:
> > 2) for dh packages:
> > adding --with autotools-dev to the dh invocation
>
> This is broken. debhelper modules are not allowed to use "-" in the name,
> the correct module name is
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2013, Wookey wrote:
> > 2) for dh packages:
> > adding --with autotools-dev to the dh invocation
>
> This is broken. debhelper modules are not allowed to use "-" in the name,
> the correct module name is "autotools_dev" as stated in the document
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 02:19:36AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2013-12-23 13:15, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
[a potentially badly-phrased question]
> ...I don't think many continue to read your rant and take your
> "feedback" seriously. Apart from those who already resonate with
> your opinion.
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013, Wookey wrote:
> 2) for dh packages:
> adding --with autotools-dev to the dh invocation
This is broken. debhelper modules are not allowed to use "-" in the name,
the correct module name is "autotools_dev" as stated in the documentation.
Yeah, this is annoying, and a large pit
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2013-12-23 23:38:15 -0800:
> On 12/24/2013 12:04 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > This is self-inflicted damage, and I think it's slightly arrogant to
> > pretend that Debian is the only organization which cares about ethics.
>
> For once, I agree with you Mar
Excerpts from Russ Allbery's message of 2013-12-23 16:42:29 -0800:
> Clint Byrum writes:
> > Excerpts from Russ Allbery's message of 2013-12-23 10:54:49 -0800:
> >> Clint Byrum writes:
>
> >>> An author is not the only party to text. There are also those who have
> >>> received this license, and
On 24/12/2013 12:59, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:23:08 +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anybody know how to force the date on manapages generated by
>> asciidoc? A quick look for 'date' in asciidoc manpage and a google
>> search on "asciidoc multiarch da
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Retout
* Package name: python-iptables
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Dhananjay Sathe
* URL : https://github.com/ldx/python-iptables
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python bin
Package: debhelper
Severity: wishlist
Every new port involves hundred of patches to packages updating
config.sub and config.guess so that packages build on the new arch.
The autotools-dev package provides extremely handy functionality which
allows this to be fixed in a clean and generic way, by
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:23:08 +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know how to force the date on manapages generated by
> asciidoc? A quick look for 'date' in asciidoc manpage and a google
> search on "asciidoc multiarch date" do not give me anything useful
> at first glanc
Hi,
Does anybody know how to force the date on manapages generated by
asciidoc? A quick look for 'date' in asciidoc manpage and a google
search on "asciidoc multiarch date" do not give me anything useful
at first glance.
Regards,
Vincent
On 24/12/2013 11:18, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package
hello debian developers,
hello trademark team,
(trademark team tl;dr: how's the incoming trademark policy going? having
trademarked and copyighted logos around is an issue again.)
i'm hooking into this topic with another aspect of it, attempting to cut
the "let's just ship the icons"-sayers with
On 23/12/13 02:16, Shawn Wilson wrote:
> My gut reaction was that #5 or #6 are the best option (leaning to #6).
> However I guess I don't understand what making something a system library
> effects the license?
>
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>
>> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
>>
>> #6 Mov
On 23 December 2013 16:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-12-23 00:54, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> On 22 December 2013 16:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> Dimitri John Ledkov (2013-12-22):
On 28 November 2013 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * Architecture Status
>* ia64 in dange
* Bastien ROUCARIES , 2013-12-23, 16:23:
I have just implemented lintian-privacy-breach tags [1,2]
I don't think “privacy breach” is an appropriate expression to use here.
Can we find a less judgmental and more technical term?
These tags check for webpage fetching external documents and thus
]] Niels Thykier
> The release team will generally remove the endangered architectures from
> testing. What happens from there on is beyond the jurisdiction of the
> release team (or, at least, beyond the jurisdiction that the release
> team wants). Though it has been implied by the FTP masters
29 matches
Mail list logo
