Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stéphane Glondu"
* Package name: optcomp
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Jérémie Dimino
* URL : https://github.com/diml/optcomp
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : syntax extension for optional
Sebastian Feld writes:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> I agree with the removal. http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2375
>> was already a sufficiently unpleasant christmas present (exploit was
>> posted on on 24th December)
> I agree with the removal. Debian
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Brian May schrieb:
>> --001a11c1fd62df72e504f0aac077
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> On 24 January 2014 04:14, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>>
>>> > My proposal is to drop the package from the archive, but I wanted to
>>> > g
Brian May writes:
> On 28 January 2014 04:08, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> (And, regardless, the telnet implementation really needs to go away.)
> I don't know what problems telnet has, however I suspect you will find
> the Kerberos ftp to be equally as bad.
I believe ftp at least uses GSS-API and h
On 28 January 2014 04:08, Russ Allbery wrote:
> (And, regardless, the telnet implementation really needs to go away.)
>
I don't know what problems telnet has, however I suspect you will find the
Kerberos ftp to be equally as bad.
At one stage, I seem to recall there was a bug in heimdal ftpd th
Simon Toedt writes:
> If courses there is another issue: What still left as "use case" of
> Kerberos5 if krb-rsh and krb-rlogin are no longer available? Typical
> university setup is krb-NFSv3/krb-NFSv4 plus krb-rlogin internally and
> ssh only for external access.
I am quite dubious of this sta
Joshuah Hurst writes:
> Only in cases when Kerberos5 is not available. One major advantage over
> ssh is that krb5-rsh has much lower latency and overhead (in terms of
> used cpu time) when executing a plain /bin/true on a remote host, doing
> that in a loop over 1000 logins can take hours with
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 16:19:24 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> And regarding the icu52 transition: The transition tracker is not smart
> enough to detect that a package has finished the transition (i.e.
> testing has a version satisfying the "good" constraint.). But this does
> not happen too o
On 2014-01-27 15:19, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2014-01-27 14:12, Osamu Aoki wrote:
It seems that this "auto-*" transition should not block upload if old
libunwind7 library is used. Especially for packages indirectly
depending on one of the auto-* packages. That is good.
Looks like the trans
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: lightcouch
Version : 0.0.6
Upstream Author : Ahmed Yehia
* URL : http://www.lightcouch.org
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : LightCouch - CouchDB Java API
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrea Capriotti
* Package name: vim-tabular
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Matthew J. Wozniski
* URL : https://github.com/godlygeek/tabular
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: Vim
Description : Vim scrip
On 2014-01-27 14:12, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> It seems that this "auto-*" transition should not block upload if old
> libunwind7 library is used. Especially for packages indirectly
> depending on one of the auto-* packages. That is good.
Looks like the transition tracker should get an optional flag "
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ximin Luo
* Package name: mozilla-password-editor
Version : 2.7.2
Upstream Author : Daniel Dawson
* URL :
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/saved-password-editor/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: JavaS
Hi,
It seems I got good answers then I have another practical question :
Can I upload ibus-qt package with warnings on PTS as below.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 05:57:38PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:06:07 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> > libunwind seems to be holding o
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:27:52AM +0100, Simon Toedt wrote:
> Hint: Before further claiming the obsolesce of krb-rsh/rlogin vs ssh
> please try ssh on an ARM box (e.g gumstix) vs krb-rsh. ssh takes
> almost 2.6 seconds to complete (even with tuning and using arcfour),
> krb-rsh executes the same i
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2014-01-25 20:23, Joshuah Hurst wrote:
>>
>> One major advantage over ssh is that krb5-rsh has much lower latency
>> and overhead (in terms of used cpu time) when executing a plain
>> /bin/true on a remote host, doing that in a loop over 10
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
* Package name: tea4cups
Version : 3.13~alpha1+svn3565
Upstream Author : Jerome Alet
* URL : http://www.pykota.com/software/tea4cups
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : The Swiss A
17 matches
Mail list logo
