El Wed, 26 de Mar 2014 a las 9:03 PM, gustavo panizzo
escribió:
On 03/26/2014 11:49 PM, Cameron Norman wrote:
I wonder if dbus activation
could be used to accomplish this. Of course, then one would not be
able
to put (in the case of Upstart) the socket bridge, dbus bridge,
dbus, or
anythin
On 03/26/2014 11:49 PM, Cameron Norman wrote:
> El Wed, 26 de Mar 2014 a las 7:07 PM, gustavo panizzo
> escribió:
>> On 03/26/2014 07:40 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>> If you want thing to move on, stop posting useless messages, and
>> start working on alternatives. For example, helping
El Wed, 26 de Mar 2014 a las 7:07 PM, gustavo panizzo
escribió:
On 03/26/2014 07:40 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
If you want thing to move on, stop posting useless messages, and
start
working on alternatives. For example, helping adding more features
to
OpenRC would certainly help a way mor
On 03/26/2014 07:40 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> If you want thing to move on, stop posting useless messages, and start
> working on alternatives. For example, helping adding more features to
> OpenRC would certainly help a way more than this post.
going offtopic here, do you know if there is any
* Mathieu Malaterre , 2014-03-24, 12:38:
I am preparing to upload openjpeg 2.0. This is a major API (yes API)
change from previous openjpeg 1.x.
None of these openjpeg versions seem to use versioned symbols. If you
want to have both in the archive at the same, then both should use them.
--
Hi,
Kevin Toppins:
> But here is the vastly oversimplified technical argument...
>
To the point of being neither technical nor valid.
(Which admittedly was never in doubt even before I started reading.)
> I think you will confirm that neither you, nor I, nor the guy who came
> up with the origin
Excerpts from Kevin Toppins's message of 2014-03-26 13:00:22 -0700:
> On 26 March 2014 13:42, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> [...]
> > As far as the systemd vs. upstart discussion, I was leaning in upstart (more
> > precisely, against systemd). As such, your email was very interesting to me.
> > Unfortu
- Forwarded message from Andrei POPESCU -
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:16:51 +0200
From: Andrei POPESCU
To: "Andrés G. Aragoneses" , 742...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-de...@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#742729: ITP: gstreamer-sharp-1.0 -- new revamped GStreamer CLI
bindings that tar
On 26 March 2014 13:42, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
[...]
> As far as the systemd vs. upstart discussion, I was leaning in upstart (more
> precisely, against systemd). As such, your email was very interesting to me.
> Unfortunately, it was unreadable. You said you'll start with background, but
> instea
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Tryton Maintainers
* Package name: tryton-modules-stock-package
Version : 3.2.0
Upstream Author : Tryton project (www.tryton.org)
* URL : http://downloads.tryton.org/3.2/
* Licen
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Tryton Maintainers
* Package name: tryton-modules-sale-shipment-grouping
Version : 3.2.0
Upstream Author : Tryton project (www.tryton.org)
* URL : http://downloads.tryton.org/3.2
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Tryton Maintainers
* Package name: tryton-modules-party-relationship
Version : 3.2.0
Upstream Author : Tryton project (www.tryton.org)
* URL : http://downloads.tryton.org/3.2/
*
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Tryton Maintainers
* Package name: tryton-modules-sale-credit-limit
Version : 3.2.0
Upstream Author : Tryton project (www.tryton.org)
* URL : http://downloads.tryton.org/3.2/
* L
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Tryton Maintainers
* Package name: tryton-modules-account-payment-sepa
Version : 3.2.0
Upstream Author : Tryton project (www.tryton.org)
* URL : http://downloads.tryton.org/3.2/
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Tryton Maintainers
* Package name: tryton-modules-account-credit-limit
Version : 3.2.0
Upstream Author : Tryton project (www.tryton.org)
* URL : http://downloads.tryton.org/3.2/
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Tryton Maintainers
* Package name: tryton-modules-account-payment
Version : 3.2.0
Upstream Author : Tryton project (www.tryton.org)
* URL : http://downloads.tryton.org/3.2/
* Lic
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Tryton Maintainers
* Package name: tryton-modules-account-invoice-stock
Version : 3.2.0
Upstream Author : Tryton project (www.tryton.org)
* URL : http://downloads.tryton.org/3.2/
On 25/03/14 18:33, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:15, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> I was very proud of my fellow colleagues for not feeding the troll a
>> full 24 hours later. Thanks for breaking the record :(
>
> I had a hope that the no one will answer OP. :(
>
>
--
To UN
On 26/03/14 17:13, Kevin Toppins wrote:
> I am going to have to respectfully disagree with you on my post being useless.
With the hope of contributing constructive criticism, I'll answer that.
As far as the systemd vs. upstart discussion, I was leaning in upstart
(more precisely, against systemd).
On 26 March 2014 10:13, Cameron Norman wrote:
[...]
> That is pretty much impossible, according to the developers of the logind
> API and its single implementation. Perhaps a subset of the logind API for
> use by desktop environments / compositors would be more useful in this init
> and OS portabi
On 26 March 2014 05:40, Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
> If you want thing to move on, stop posting useless messages, and start
> working on alternatives. For example, helping adding more features to
> OpenRC would certainly help a way more than this post.
I am going to have to respectfully disagre
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 03/25/2014 12:42 AM, Kevin Toppins wrote:
> Writing an independent, init system agnostic, logind API compatible
> daemon would be another good thing to do.
>
That is pretty much impossible, according to the developers of the logind
API
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda"
* Package name: octomap
Version : 1.6.5
Upstream Author : Armin Hornung, Kai M. Wurm, Maren Bennewitz, Cyrill
Stachniss and Wolfram Burgard
* URL : http://octomap.github.io/
* License : GPL-2
Hi!
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 22:38:45 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> What you're showing here is a snapshot at some point in the middle of an
> upgrade, when texlive-common has been removed (because the package no longer
> exists, and the new texlive-base conflicts with it) and texlive-base has not
>
Hi,
Michael Biebl:
> I do think it might be useful information, at least during the
> transition period. We can always revisit this decision in jessie+X, if
> by that time the vast majority is running systemd.
>
We'd still want that information, if/when the current init is *not* systemd.
Likewis
On 03/25/2014 12:42 AM, Kevin Toppins wrote:
> Sorry for the intrusion into your world, but this *needed* to be said,
> and needed to be said on *this* specific list.
Not correct. We didn't need another iteration of such a post.
> -> the *future* of linux actually *does* depend on what -> you <-
On 2014-03-26 02:49, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
To be honest I'd rather like to see a "ruling" which is codified in a
policy
than random guesswork we do on -devel from observing FTP masters'
actions.
This is not Mao.
Figuring out what the source is a
On 2014-03-26 9:14, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 26/03/14 10:03, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2014-03-26 8:39, Daniel Pocock wrote:
" not changed
gpg: key FBB75451: "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key
" not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 2
gpg: unchanged: 2
This suggests that
On 26/03/14 10:03, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2014-03-26 8:39, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I have a project that is building in the travis-ci.org environment
>> (based on Ubuntu)
> [...]
>> Unpacking debian-archive-keyring (from
>> .../debian-archive-keyring_2010.08.28_all.deb) ...
>> Setting up debia
On 2014-03-26 8:39, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I have a project that is building in the travis-ci.org environment
(based on Ubuntu)
[...]
Unpacking debian-archive-keyring (from
.../debian-archive-keyring_2010.08.28_all.deb) ...
Setting up debian-archive-keyring (2010.08.28) ...
That package is olde
I have a project that is building in the travis-ci.org environment
(based on Ubuntu)
I added the following to .travis.yml to try and make it use packages
from sid:
before_install:
- sudo apt-get update -qq
- sudo apt-get install -qq debian-archive-keyring
- sudo add-apt-repository -y "de
31 matches
Mail list logo
