Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 08/11/2014 07:49 AM, Cameron Norman wrote: > El dom, 10 de ago 2014 a las 11:39 , Kees de Jong > escribió: >> Why are we discussing CD/DVD sizes? Why not just use an USB >> netinstall? It's then possible to download and install the stuff you >> need, if you don't want to use a lot of bandwidth

Re: 2 months and no upload for pkg

2014-08-13 Thread Charles Plessy
> Quoting Amir Taaki (gen...@riseup.net): > > > However, I think maybe this might have slipped through the cracks and > > has been missed. Any information would be much appreciated. > > The responsible team (Debian Bitcoin Team) seems to be dead judging from > > their mailing list. Le Wed, Aug 13

Re: 2 months and no upload for pkg

2014-08-13 Thread Amir Taaki
Hi! Thanks for the response. I've had review on my license by the SFLC and the FSF. See their responses here: https://wiki.unsystem.net/en/index.php/Libbitcoin/License Also I have emails from the Debian mailing list on this issue which I can contribute. Is there anything I need to do to pass tha

Re: 2 months and no upload for pkg

2014-08-13 Thread Amir Taaki
Thank you. On 13/08/14 09:20, Charles Plessy wrote: >> Quoting Amir Taaki (gen...@riseup.net): >> >>> However, I think maybe this might have slipped through the cracks and >>> has been missed. Any information would be much appreciated. >>> The responsible team (Debian Bitcoin Team) seems to be dea

Re: Bug#757980: ITP: cryptography -- cryptography is a package which provides cryptographic recipes and primitives to Python developers.

2014-08-13 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Brian May wrote: > * Package name: cryptography ... > I imagine the binary package will be called python{,3}-cryptography. > Haven't got to this step yet. Wouldn't it be better to also have the source package name in the python- namespace? Its using a dictionary word for

RE:2 months and no upload for pkg

2014-08-13 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Charles > Peer review can help, by making sure that the final controllers (the FTP > Master > team) do not waste their time reporting defects that others could have found. > You can find a process for peer review at the URL below. >https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview I like a lot

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2014-08-12, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > > > On 09/08/14 04:30, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting envite (2014-08-09 10:43:25) >>> XFCE (does not mount my USB disks) >> >> Did you perhaps suppress recommends? > > Should this really be a Recommends? It surely fits the definition of Recommends. |

Re: First steps towards source-only uploads

2014-08-13 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! [ I had a note to reply to the previous thread, but never got to it. ] On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 13:27:38 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > On 08/12/2014 12:33, Hector Oron wrote: > > 2014-08-01 9:37 GMT+02:00 Ansgar Burchardt : > >> We will allow not including arch:all packages in uploads once we

Re: First steps towards source-only uploads

2014-08-13 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 02:35:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > #756975 dpkg-dev: dpkg-genchanges option to only include arch:all debs This is now available in dpkg 1.17.11, and as mentioned on the bug report, you can use it in at least these ways: # Source and arch-indep only build, will fail if

Re: First steps towards source-only uploads

2014-08-13 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > First, w-b has to recognize that arch:all packages need to be built. > And they need to be scheduled on a buildd which builds the arch:all > packages (and only the arch:all packages?). > > For the latter I assume sbuild would need an option to bu

Re: JIFFIES in userspace

2014-08-13 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Tach Joël, Am 13.08.2014 05:42, schrieb Joël Krähemann: > Hi I develop an audio sequencer: > http://ags.sf.net > > Now, what values would you recommend as JIFFIEs for the following > threads: > > * AgsAudioLoop > * AgsTaskThread > * AgsGuiThread > * AgsDevoutThread the topic of the debian-devel

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:17:10PM -0700, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > > That's why I see GNOME 3 as a tablet environment. I'd love to use a > tablet with GNOME 3. But using it in a desktop just reduces the > communication between me and my computer. What is Debian? This is actually the core (hidden)

A proposition for you..

2014-08-13 Thread Kevin Baker
Hello there, Basically I’m emailing today to see if you offer any advertising options on your site. I’m working with a Web Hosting company and I think advertising or a sponsored post on your site would be really beneficial to them. I have thought of a few ideas if you do offer sponsored post opti

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Axel Wagner
Hi, Theodore Ts'o writes: > This is actually the core (hidden) question which I think is driving > the whole debate. Ignoring the claims of Debian as the "universal > operating system", what audience does Debian what to target by default > in its installer? Agreed. Though "default" is a very im

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, On 08/13/2014 15:43, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Is it the power user? Is it developers? Is it the typical users I've > seen on Launchpad, such that I've largely stopped dealing with bug > reports there --- far too many Ubuntu users can't file a proper bug > report, and then other Ubuntu users Go

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-08-13 Thread Attila Kinali
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:30:05 +0200 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > I never understood why people who once where friends > became mutually so hostile You should know that better than anyone else! You still claim to be my friend, yet you said and did things that i have not seen from my enemies, let

Re: 2 months and no upload for pkg

2014-08-13 Thread Amir Taaki
It has now appeared in the repos! Thanks everyone. https://packages.qa.debian.org/libb/libbitcoin.html On 13/08/14 09:20, Charles Plessy wrote: >> Quoting Amir Taaki (gen...@riseup.net): >> >>> However, I think maybe this might have slipped through the cracks and >>> has been missed. Any informa

Bug#758041: ITP: python-xstatic-hogan -- Hogan.js XStatic support

2014-08-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: python-xstatic-hogan Version : 2.0.0.2 Upstream Author : Radomir Dopieralski * URL : https://github.com/stackforge/xstatic-hogan * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python, JS Desc

Re: First steps towards source-only uploads

2014-08-13 Thread Josh Triplett
Guillem Jover wrote: > # Full build, but filter the generated .changes file to only inlcude > # source and possibly arch-indep binaries, will not fail if the > # latter are missing. > $ dpkg-buildpackage --changes-option=-g > > The advantage of the second is that the package is fully built

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 04:09:25PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > To quote a fairly famous Linux user who eventually came back from XFCE > to GNOME: "But I'm actually back to gnome3 because with the right > extensions it is more pleasant."[1] > > But I'm not sure if he qualifies as a power user

Bug#758053: ITP: ruby-exception-notification -- exception notification support for Rails and Rack apps

2014-08-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Antonio Terceiro * Package name: ruby-exception-notification Version : 4.0.1 Upstream Author : Jamis Buck * URL : https://github.com/smartinez87/exception_notification * License : MIT (Expat) Programming Lang: Ruby De

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Anthony F McInerney
> > But I'm actually back to gnome3 because with the right > extensions it is more pleasant." > So the question is does debian have the extensions he speaks of? (and) Have debian tweaked those extensions by default, to his liking? And to quote a not so famous computer user who said "what's that c

Re: First steps towards source-only uploads

2014-08-13 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 12:24:49 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > Guillem Jover wrote: > > # Full build, but filter the generated .changes file to only inlcude > > # source and possibly arch-indep binaries, will not fail if the > > # latter are missing. > > $ dpkg-buildpackage --changes-option=-

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2014-08-13 22:05 GMT+02:00 Anthony F McInerney : >> But I'm actually back to gnome3 because with the right >> extensions it is more pleasant." > > So the question is does debian have the extensions he speaks of? > (and) Have debian tweaked those extensions by default, to his liking? > > And to quo

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:18:49PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > Well, Linus' extensions won't break because GNOME updates them with > every release and ships them with the official GNOME release. >From the README found in "gnome-shell-extensions" sources: GNOME Shell Extensions is a collec

Re: First steps towards source-only uploads

2014-08-13 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2014-08-13 14:34, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Colin Watson wrote: I don't think there's a good reason to build them separately, and some good reasons not to (for example, it would waste a good deal of buildd time for a number of packages without very hygienic separation of th

Re: Bugs which do not belong to console-setup

2014-08-13 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Am 07.08.2014 12:32, schrieb Anton Zinoviev: > I have two bugs reported against console-setup about keybord not working > properly under X Window. In both cases I have asked the reportes to > provide the file /etc/default/keyboard and in both cases the file was > correct. Therefore, the bugs

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2014-08-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Theodore Ts'o : > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:18:49PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: >> Well, Linus' extensions won't break because GNOME updates them with >> every release and ships them with the official GNOME release. > > From the README found in "gnome-shell-extensions"

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Hashem Nasarat
On 08/13/2014 06:08 PM, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > 2014-08-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Theodore Ts'o : >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:18:49PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: >>> Well, Linus' extensions won't break because GNOME updates them with >>> every release and ships them with the official GNOME release.

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 12 août 2014 à 12:26 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > Ian Jackson wrote: > > Do you intend to review (or are you reviewing) the decision taken in > > July 2012 [1] ? If so, is this discussion here on -devel useful ? If > > it is useful, what questions should we be focusing on ? > > See my

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Simon McVittie
On 13/08/14 23:08, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > the common reaction I get from new Linux users [...] > I would also recommend to go for > this user group when selecting a default, since any more experienced > user can absolutely be expected to pick the right image with their > favourite flavour of Debi

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:34:46PM -0400, Hashem Nasarat wrote: > > The following "first party" extensions are developed along with > gnome-shell and are updated for each gnome-shell release. > https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell-extensions/tree/extensions > > Extensions on https://extension

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Anthony F McInerney
> > > I’d like the thread to be useful, and for that goal it would be much > appreciated if the d-i team could you tell us what the relevant criteria > are and what people need to work on. > > → Is the installation CD size still relevant? > → What is the target audience of Debian-installer for the

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Roger Lynn
On 07/08/14 23:10, Jordi Mallach wrote: > Popularity: One of the metrics discussed by the tasksel change proponents > mentioned popcon numbers. 8 months after the desktop change, Xfce does not > seem > to have made a dent on install numbers. The Debian GNOME team doesn’t feel > popcon’s data

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-13 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org): > I’d like the thread to be useful, and for that goal it would be much > appreciated if the d-i team could you tell us what the relevant criteria > are and what people need to work on. Here is my opinion. Please take it as "opinion of someone who's been

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-08-13 Thread Thomas Weber
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:53:41AM +0100, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > Also ive offered my resignation in the past. > > I do still offer to resign from the FFmpeg leader position, if it > > resolves this split between FFmpeg and Libav and make everyone work > > together again. I never understood why pe