On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:17 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> the manual of my package is written in SGML language.
> I guess that it may be translate into a more readable format:
> What is the best Debian way to convert it in HTML and/or PDF (via LaTeX) ?
It sounds like this is a manual that is only a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marcin Haba
* Package name: baculum
Version : 7.0+git20150208
Upstream Author : Marcin Haba
* URL : http://www.bacula.org/
* License : AGPLv3
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : Baculum WebGUI tool for Bacula Com
On 09/03/15 21:00, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello Riley, thanks for your prompt reply.
>
> Meanwhile I realized that it is a linuxdoc document:
> what I need can be found in the following page:
>
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/sgml-howto/x277.html
which contains obsolete material: a better
Hello Riley, thanks for your prompt reply.
Meanwhile I realized that it is a linuxdoc document:
what I need can be found in the following page:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/sgml-howto/x277.html
On 09/03/15 20:49, Riley Baird wrote:
>> the manual of my package is written in SGML language.
>
Hi,
it appears that it is LinuxDoc document:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/sgml-howto/x277.html
Sorry for the noise,
Jerome
On 09/03/15 20:17, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> the manual of my package is written in SGML language.
> I guess that it may be translate into a more reada
> the manual of my package is written in SGML language.
> I guess that it may be translate into a more readable format:
> What is the best Debian way to convert it in HTML and/or PDF (via LaTeX) ?
I recently had to deal with this problem myself, when packaging the
documentation for granule. If the
Hello List,
the manual of my package is written in SGML language.
I guess that it may be translate into a more readable format:
What is the best Debian way to convert it in HTML and/or PDF (via LaTeX) ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On 09/03/15 14:16, Francois Gouget wrote:
> About a month ago I sent fixes to make a bunch of packages multiarch
> compatible.
You might have noticed that Debian has been in a freeze for the last 4
months: https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html
Multiarch'ifying libraries for Debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Zygmunt Krynicki
* Package name: python-padme
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Zygmunt Krynicki
* URL : https://github.com/zyga/padme/
* License : LGPL3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : mostly transpare
About a month ago I sent fixes to make a bunch of packages multiarch
compatible. However, except for two packages, none of the 20 packages
have included the proposed fix, or commented on them, requested
improvements, or given any sign of life.
What can I do to help move things forward?
Here
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jasper van Hoorn
* Package name: luckyluks
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Jasper van Hoorn
* URL : https://github.com/jas-per/luckyLUKS
* License : GPLv3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : GUI for creatin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Balasankar C
* Package name: ruby-fog-serverlove
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Paulo Henrique Lopes Ribeiro
* URL : https://github.com/fog/fog-serverlove
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arvid Requate
* Package name: python-u2flib-server
Version : 3.1.0
Upstream Author : Yubico Open Source Maintainers
* URL : https://developers.yubico.com/python-u2flib-server/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
13 matches
Mail list logo
