On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> #786909 was absolutely not acceptable, and was treated as such.
> Social contract #1 remains in effect and will continue to do so in
> spite of day to day bugs that violate its spirit.
It might be interesting to think about ways we can auto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/06/2015 01:35 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
.
.
.
> Social contract #1 remains in effect and will continue to do so in
> spite of day to day bugs that violate its spirit.
^ best answer ever!
> Best wishes, Mike
>
>
Cheers,
zlatan
- --
I
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 12:29 AM, lumin wrote:
> For example, the Chromium:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786909
> What if we constantly keep feeling free to use non-free blobs,
> and get compromised with those suspicious weird binary blobs,
> and those odd software behaviours
Package: general
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation? Seems unrelated to any change
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)? I thought that it was a st
On 07/05/2015 10:46 PM, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> Am 05.07.2015 um 09:15 schrieb Jackson Doak:
>> It might be possible to rename the binary and symlink "drive" to it,
>> which would allow you to give the binary name over easier
>
>
> Top-posting in a thread breaks the flow of the messages - as you
Sorry ... My phone ... Grrgh ..
El dom., 5 de julio de 2015 23:14, Javier Barroso
escribió:
> El dom., 5 de julio de 2015 22:47, Tomas Pospisek
> escribió:
>
>> Am 05.07.2015 um 09:15 schrieb Jackson Doak:
>> > It might be possible to rename the binary and symlink "drive" to it,
>> > which woul
El dom., 5 de julio de 2015 22:47, Tomas Pospisek
escribió:
> Am 05.07.2015 um 09:15 schrieb Jackson Doak:
> > It might be possible to rename the binary and symlink "drive" to it,
> > which would allow you to give the binary name over easier
>
>
> Top-posting in a thread breaks the flow of the me
Am 05.07.2015 um 09:15 schrieb Jackson Doak:
> It might be possible to rename the binary and symlink "drive" to it,
> which would allow you to give the binary name over easier
Top-posting in a thread breaks the flow of the messages - as you can see
here.
The way to go here would be the alternati
On 07/04/2015 10:40 AM, Jan Gloser wrote:
I am not an active member of the debian community, just a listener on
this thread, but you got my attention. I also admire free software
makers although I think one must always keep in mind the reality of the
world and the rules of the game called 'trade'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Unsubscribe
On 5 July 2015 19:48:48 BST, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>Format: 1.8
>Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 13:30:12 -0700
>Source: wesnoth-1.10
>Binary: wesnoth-1.10-data wesnoth-1.10-core wesnoth-core
>w
Hi,
I've heard rumours that GCC 5 is coming :-)
I help maintain several C++ libraries and expect some work is required to get
through this GCC transition. I'd like to understand what I'm doing and do it
right the first time. I'm just an average C++ programmer, not an avid follower
of GCC nor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-r.oo
Version : 1.19.0
Upstream Author : Henrik Bengtsson
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/R.oo/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: R
Description : GNU R object-o
On 07/05/2015 09:15 AM, Jackson Doak wrote:
> It might be possible to rename the binary and symlink "drive" to it, which
> would allow you to give the binary name over easier
Personally, I think it would be best not to reserve such a generic name
'drive' for such a specific service. There could ea
Hi all
Free software stands for a high qualitative product. It isn't at least of
the collaborative model it uses, everybody can contribute as much as he
want. And it won't be a last technological progress that will free man kind
from its responsibilities. Anything other than openness isn't accepta
lumin writes:
> Besides, some Free Software Licenses don't prevent people from selling
> them for profit, and so does Debian GNU/linux itself.
Indeed, if a license restricts charging a fee when redistributing the
work, it is by definition (FSF and DFSG) not a free license.
The work is only free
It might be possible to rename the binary and symlink "drive" to it, which
would allow you to give the binary name over easier
On 5 Jul 2015 9:11 am, "Clint Byrum" wrote:
> Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of 2015-07-04 13:45:40 -0700:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Samstag, den 04.07.2015, 17:16 +02
16 matches
Mail list logo
