On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I have also made the point that we make an exception for licence
> texts. Obviously the situations aren't entirely parallel, but this
> demonstrates that the absolutist position you are arguing for is both
> contrary to our existing practice,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I, myself, find our DFSG-freeness pickiness going too far, and I'm sick
> of this icon thing. So, here's what I'm going to do: unless I hear
> non-IANAL objection until the next upstream release due on august 11
> (and I'm BCCing the DPL in cas
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> But that section can be split in to 2 sentions. FREE and NON-FREE,
> with FREE on the top.
It is already split into sections by language. Maybe just list the
licenses and sort the list in each section by freeness?
> I think we are missing De
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Given that there's now a Free (as in Software) Debian book[0], with a
> suitable translation infrastructure, I wonder if we shouldn't refrain
> from advertising or endorsing non-free alternatives, and rather
> encourage contributions to this
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Can you point me at the server code, or configuration that handled
> your push ?
I'm not familiar with the setup but I think it uses the
ikiwiki-hosting packages.
> That commit is on HEAD. But the request was for the pushed commits to
> land
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 682 (new: 11)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 175 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
On 16/07/15 18:14, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Can you point me at the server code, or configuration that handled
> your push ?
Documentation: https://ikiwiki.info/tips/untrusted_git_push/
Implementation (it's a pre-receive hook):
http://source.ikiwiki.branchable.com/?p=source.git;a=blob;f=IkiWiki/Rece
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: openhft-chronicle-queue
Version : 2.0.3
Upstream Author : Peter Lawrey
* URL : https://github.com/OpenHFT/Chronicle-Queue
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description :
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 08:29 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Simon Richter wrote:
> >> > The problem is that the icons are displayed in the search field
> >> > dropdown, which should be fully functional before visiting the fir
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:20:35 +0200
"IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 08:29 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Simon Richter wrote:
> >> > The problem is that the icons are displayed in the search field
> >> > dropdown, which should be fully functional before
Hello,
I am Adelia Yasino, working with Software Development Company.
We are an Indian Web Design, Mobile Apps and Web Development firm. In
these tough times, where it is hard to maintain the top line, we can
help share the bottom-line for you.
We will be happy to help execute Software Developme
On 07/16/2015 08:29 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Simon Richter wrote:
>> > The problem is that the icons are displayed in the search field
>> > dropdown, which should be fully functional before visiting the first
>> > site.
> I was hoping that it could be semi-functional, with pl
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Simon Richter wrote:
> The problem is that the icons are displayed in the search field
> dropdown, which should be fully functional before visiting the first
> site.
I was hoping that it could be semi-functional, with placeholder icons
until the site in question is actually vi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: openhft-lang
Version : 6.1.4
Upstream Author : Peter Lawrey
* URL : https://github.com/OpenHFT/Java-Lang
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : High Performance
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:11:08PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 15/07/15 at 19:37 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Press and articles
> > --
> > Quite a bit of press and general Debian outreach in the last few weeks:
> > * Debian Jessie book preface [0]
> >
> > [0] http://www.l
Paul Wise writes ("Re: GitHub “pull request ” is proprietary, incom patible
with Git ‘requ est-pull ’"):
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > But if there is server side support for anyone to push to some ref in
> > the maintainer's repository without any authentication i
Antonio Terceiro writes ("Re: GitHub “pull request ” is proprietary,
incompatible with Git ‘req u est-pull ’"):
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:25:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Would you like me to write you a proof-of-concept ?
>
> It would be nice, but given the amount of stuff I am already i
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 07:17:03AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I, myself, find our DFSG-freeness pickiness going too far, and I'm sick
> of this icon thing. So, here's what I'm going to do: unless I hear
> non-IANAL objection until the next upstream release due on august 11
> (and I'm BCCing the DP
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sérgio Benjamim
* Package name : retroarch
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Hans-Kristian Arntzen / Daniel De Matteis / The RetroArch
Team
* URL : http://www.libretro.com/
* Lic
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 06:00:17PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Am 16.07.2015 um 16:57 schrieb Don Armstrong:
> > How easy would it be to modify the code so that it only gets the
> > favorite icons when the site is actually visited? [Does it already try
> > to update the icons when it visits
Hi,
Am 16.07.2015 um 16:57 schrieb Don Armstrong:
> How easy would it be to modify the code so that it only gets the
> favorite icons when the site is actually visited? [Does it already try
> to update the icons when it visits one of the configured sites?]
The problem is that the icons are displ
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: openhft-compiler
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Author : Peter Lawrey
* URL : https://github.com/OpenHFT/Java-Runtime-Compiler
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : J
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:25:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Antonio Terceiro writes ("Re: GitHub “pull request ” is proprietary,
> incompatible with Git ‘req u est-pull ’"):
> > But if there is server side support for anyone to push to some ref in
> > the maintainer's repository without any aut
On 16/07/15 at 23:35 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I think we are missing Debisn systemd documents soch as slides
> such as one by Lucas (FREE):
> https://github.com/lnussbaum/slides-lectures/blob/master/systemd.pdf
>
> If this is packaged as debian package, we can put it to our web page.
Heh, I'm
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:56:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I was surprised that it would download the icons from the installed
> > search providers. There is no need for it to do that. And that means
> > that the mere presence of an unused but configu
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:11:08PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 15/07/15 at 19:37 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Press and articles
> > --
> > Quite a bit of press and general Debian outreach in the last few weeks:
> > * Debian Jessie book preface [0]
> >
> > [0] http://
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonh Wendell
* Package name: spdylay
Version : 1.3.2
Upstream Author : Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
* URL : http://tatsuhiro-t.github.io/spdylay/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Implementation of Googl
also sprach Lucas Nussbaum [2015-07-16 13:11 +0200]:
> Given that there's now a Free (as in Software) Debian book[0], with a
> suitable translation infrastructure, I wonder if we shouldn't refrain
> from advertising or endorsing non-free alternatives, and rather
> encourage contributions to this i
Ben Finney writes ("Re: The Spirit of Free Software, or The Reality"):
> So the above seems to argue either that search engine icons are
> sufficiently important that we can violate the Social Contract, or I've
> misunderstood. I'd like to know exactly where that misunderstanding is.
You are argui
On 15/07/15 at 19:37 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Press and articles
> --
> Quite a bit of press and general Debian outreach in the last few weeks:
> * Debian Jessie book preface [0]
>
> [0] http://www.linux-journalist.com/bucher/
Given that there's now a Free (as in Software) De
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: reactive-streams
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Reactive Streams SIG
* URL : http://www.reactive-streams.org
* License : CC0-1.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Standard for
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> But if there is server side support for anyone to push to some ref in
> the maintainer's repository without any authentication in a way that
> won't otherwise interefere with the maintainer's regular trees, the
> client side "should be eas
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Hans wrote:
> It would be very nice, if you could somehow file a bugreport, as I cannot send
> a bugreport with the computer where the bug appears using reportbug. So I used
> another computer.
You can submit a bugreport (if this is actually a bug) via email, as
d
Dear developers,
after update to kernel 4.0 I discovered, that the network device AR8123 is not
detected properly. Although the module atl1c is loaded correctly, it is not
bound to the device. So there is no "eth0" after boot.
I can unload and reload the kernel module manually after boot, and t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I ran a successful crowd funding campaign to work full time for a
month on diaspora packaging
(http://www.indiegogo.com/at/debian-diaspora) and here is the summary
of work done.
diaspora init script updated, diaspora-installer uploaded, diaspora
pac
On Jul 16, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I, myself, find our DFSG-freeness pickiness going too far, and I'm sick
> of this icon thing. So, here's what I'm going to do: unless I hear
> non-IANAL objection until the next upstream release due on august 11
> (and I'm BCCing the DPL in case he wants to have th
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: dgit: all users of dgit << 0.30 please upgrade"):
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 06:00:32PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > * I am going to move the git repositories. The old version of dgit
> > >will sto
37 matches
Mail list logo
