Bug#796289: ITP: python-eta -- python module to generate progress bar for CLI

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Olivier Sallou * Package name: python-eta Version : 0.9.7 Upstream Author : Marcus Breese * URL : https://github.com/mbreese/eta * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description : python module to generate pro

Work-needing packages report for Aug 21, 2015

The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 680 (new: 9) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 181 (new: 1) Total number of packages request

Bug#796265: ITP: tor-monitor -- GTK+ application to display Tor circuits and streams

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sascha Steinbiss * Package name: tor-monitor Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Tails developers * URL : http://git.tails.boum.org/alan/tor-monitor/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description : GTK+ applic

Re: Facilitating external repositories

Hi! On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:53:17 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > A repository with a whitelist cannot install packages with names outside > that whitelist. It should also not be able to have packages with > Provides: or Replaces: headers outside that whitelist (so you can't ship > a package that

Minutes from the "32bit architectures in Debian"-bof

Hi together, minutes from the "32bit architectures in Debian" bof right now. Andi 32bit architectures in Debian - 32bit architectures are not going away for the forseeable - Compiling/Linking is the memory-using issue - We need a way to compile/link with more memory Proposal A: - Use "cross-c

Bug#796228: ITP: ruby-contracts -- Contracts (assert like) for Ruby

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sebastien Badia * Package name: ruby-contracts Version : 0.11.0 Upstream Author : Aditya Bhargava * URL : http://egonschiele.github.com/contracts.ruby * License : BSD Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Contract

Re: git interface to snapshot.debian.org

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2015, 11:03 +0200 schrieb Marco d'Itri: > I have not thought of recreating the history of the upstream > > versions > > correctly. I mostly care about the “what was in Debian” aspect of > > history, but it should not hurt to have the upstream branches as well. > I am n

Bug#796221: ITP: php-net-ldap3 -- Object oriented interface for searching and manipulating LDAP entries

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vincent Bernat -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 * Package name: php-net-ldap3 Version : 1.0.3 Upstream Author : Jeroen van Meeuwen * URL : https://git.kolab.org/diffusion/PNL/php-net_ldap.git * License : G

Re: git interface to snapshot.debian.org

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:03:45AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > If you are just looking at adding a git interface to snapshot.d.o. then > maybe git-annex would be more appropriate while using much less > resources? This is primarily targeted at serving as a common starting point for packages tha

Re: git interface to snapshot.debian.org

On Aug 20, Joachim Breitner wrote: > I have not thought of recreating the history of the upstream versions > correctly. I mostly care about the “what was in Debian” aspect of > history, but it should not hurt to have the upstream branches as well. I am not sure then that I see how these snapshot

Re: git interface to snapshot.debian.org

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2015, 05:40 +0200 schrieb Marco d'Itri: > On Aug 18, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > this is a follow-up to my question after the dgit talk today: It would > > be great to have a git view of the a package’s history in Debian. There > > I have spent quite a lot of time