On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 06:14:05AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Is this enough to go on to move this to a report against gnome-software?
>
> Bug reported btw.
Where? ( "Where to follow the bugreport?" )
This is from https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=gnome-software
* Ou
On 08/27/2015 05:19 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
>> Strange - then the install-updates mode should not have been entered in
>> the first place.
> Let me guess, the file was re-created by some software.
As administrator of my own systems it would bother me that some random
file /remove-my-packages wi
❦ 28 août 2015 01:46 GMT, Bas Wijnen :
> Or alternatively, by packaging the minifier that is being used with the
> package
> that needs it. Yes, that's a horrible idea with lots of code duplication, but
> if I understand the problem, every JS file must be minified with the exact
> version of t
❦ 27 août 2015 22:04 GMT, Bas Wijnen :
>> > The minifier is a compiler. If it's not in main, files that are compiled
>> > with
>> > it cannot be in main. For javascript, the easy solution is to not use the
>> > compiler. Non-minified code works fine.
>>
>> Non-minified code is decomposed in
> Is this enough to go on to move this to a report against gnome-software?
Bug reported btw.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go
> Having just read this entire thread, and been affected by this once, it
> occurs to me that the likely answer has been offered, but I suspect you
> may have thought Matthias' reference to “GNOME Software” to be a generic
> answer (apologies if I'm wrong). But in fact the name of the relevant
No,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 04:14:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bas Wijnen writes:
>
> > On the other hand, shipping packages that cannot be rebuilt with tools
> > from Debian will also result in angry users. For me personally, one of
> > the bigger
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 675 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 183 (new: 3)
Total number of packages request
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 05:19:18 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I never wanted to execute offline-updates. So seeing those updates
> proves that something triggered it, right?
Having just read this entire thread, and been affected by this once, it
occurs to me that the likely answer has been offer
Bas Wijnen writes:
> On the other hand, shipping packages that cannot be rebuilt with tools
> from Debian will also result in angry users. For me personally, one of
> the bigger reasons I use Debian is that we take good care that I can
> modify everything on my system, and use the modified versi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:35:01AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 25 août 2015 22:37 GMT, Bas Wijnen :
>
> >> We need to leave the Javascript ecosystem mature a bit more but in the
> >> meantime, a bit of tolerance would be appreciated
> >
> > The
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:45 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 12:08 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > Specific issues:
> > > > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> > > > there open issues for i3
On 2015-08-27 14:57, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:12:41PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> * ddebs are Debian packages with the extension .deb that
>> contain debugging symbols and are built implicitly.
>> - A package foo_1.23.deb will receive a corresponding
>> foo_1.23-
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 12:08 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Specific issues:
> > > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> > > there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
> > > Discussion that we n
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Yes and both of them are here. Only the build method is either
> unavailable, unspecified or needing network connectivity.
Sounds like something that should be in contrib?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On 26/08/15 20:30, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> Pseudo has a lot of similarities to fakeroot but is a new implementation
>> that improves on the problems seen using fakeroot. Pseudo is now
>> extensively used by Poky as a replacement to fakeroot but can also be
>> used standalone in many o
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:12:41PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * ddebs are Debian packages with the extension .deb that
> contain debugging symbols and are built implicitly.
> - A package foo_1.23.deb will receive a corresponding
> foo_1.23-dbgsym.ddeb package.
Are they named .deb or .dd
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: ironic-discoverd
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : The OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/ironic-discoverd
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Descri
On 27/08/15 09:22, Svante Signell wrote:
> Any ideas how to proceed until bug #795287 is closed?
Hi Svante,
Since you can't install the pre-regression binary (since it links
against the pre-gcc5-transition libs), maybe you'll have more luck
grabbing the old source code and building (older) evolut
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 08:48:54 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Release team, here are some suggestions for binNMUs and other
> wanna-build interactions:
>
> Fixes for some earlier failures, and version skews caused by
> maintainer-built binaries not being discarded:
>
> # retry failed build wit
On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 12:59 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 02:52:14PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > With the latest debian packages, 3.16.3-1.1 evo cannot any longer
> > connect to Contacts and the gmail account. [...]
> > Following sid has normally been OK, having to acce
21 matches
Mail list logo
