Bug#802758: ITP: zsh-syntax-highlighting -- Fish shell like syntax highlighting for Zsh

2015-10-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Daniel Shahaf * Package name: zsh-syntax-highlighting Version : 0.3.0 Upstream Author : Multiple authors * URL : https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-syntax-highlighting/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: Zsh Description

Re: Bug#802595: ITP: node-defined -- return the first argument that is `!== undefined`

2015-10-23 Thread Steve McIntyre
Josh Triplett wrote: >Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >> YA tiny Javascript "library" containing 3 lines of utterly trivial >> code. :-( >> >> I appreciate you're just following through a dependency chain from >> upstream for tape, but please push back on upstream and ask them why >> they're doing this

Re: Bug#802595: ITP: node-defined -- return the first argument that is `!== undefined`

2015-10-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Steve McIntyre wrote: > separate library for a single function as trivial as: > > for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) { > if (arguments[i] !== undefined) return arguments[i]; > } > Yes, by all means if you're using it a lot. But a separate library > wi

Re: Bug#802595: ITP: node-defined -- return the first argument that is `!== undefined`

2015-10-23 Thread Ross Gammon
On 10/23/2015 04:21 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Steve McIntyre wrote: separate library for a single function as trivial as: for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) { if (arguments[i] !== undefined) return arguments[i]; } Yes, by all means if you're

Re: Bug#802595: ITP: node-defined -- return the first argument that is `!== undefined`

2015-10-23 Thread Josh Triplett
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:14:46PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Josh Triplett wrote: > >Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> > >> YA tiny Javascript "library" containing 3 lines of utterly trivial > >> code. :-( > >> > >> I appreciate you're just following through a dependency chain from > >> upstream fo

Bug#802805: ITP: otto -- easy development and deployment for cloud platforms

2015-10-23 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Daniel Stender * Package name: otto Version : 0.1.2 Upstream Author : Mitchell Hashimoto * URL : https://github.com/hashicorp/otto/ * License : MPL-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description : easy development and depl

Bug#802806: ITP: fades -- the virtualenv automagic cache

2015-10-23 Thread Facundo Batista
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Facundo Batista * Package name: fades Version : 4 Upstream Author : Facundo Batista * URL : https://github.com/PyAr/fades/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description : fades is a system that automatical

Linux kernels v3.18.x and v4.2.x in sid

2015-10-23 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
Dear Debian developers, I wonder if somebody knows what are the plans for packaging kernels 3.18.x and 4.2.x? 3.18 was released long time ago, and I think it is mature. 4.2.x would be nice to play with. I have searched here: > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=all&searchon=names&keywords=k

Re: Linux kernels v3.18.x and v4.2.x in sid

2015-10-23 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 12:35 +0200, Dmitry Katsubo wrote: > Dear Debian developers, > > I wonder if somebody knows what are the plans for packaging kernels > 3.18.x and 4.2.x? 3.18 was released long time ago, and I think it is > mature. 4.2.x would be nice to play with. I have searched here: >

Re: Linux kernels v3.18.x and v4.2.x in sid

2015-10-23 Thread Stephen Kitt
Hi Dmitry, On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:35:47 +0200, Dmitry Katsubo wrote: > I wonder if somebody knows what are the plans for packaging kernels > 3.18.x and 4.2.x? 3.18 was released long time ago, and I think it is > mature. 4.2.x would be nice to play with. I have searched here: > > > https://packag

Re: Linux kernels v3.18.x and v4.2.x in sid

2015-10-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Dmitry Katsubo writes: > I wonder if somebody knows what are the plans for packaging kernels > 3.18.x and 4.2.x? 3.18 was released long time ago, and I think it is > mature. 4.2.x would be nice to play with. I have searched here: >> https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=all&searchon=names&key

Re: Linux kernels v3.18.x and v4.2.x in sid

2015-10-23 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 23/10/2015 22:43, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 12:35 +0200, Dmitry Katsubo wrote: >> Dear Debian developers, >> >> I wonder if somebody knows what are the plans for packaging >> kernels 3.18.x and 4.2.x? 3.18 was released long time ago, and I >> think it is mature. 4.2.