On 24 November 2015 at 04:45, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 03:23 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> btrfs check is a destructive tool, that can attempt repairing btrfs
>> filesystem. it should not be run automatically, nor non-interractive,
>> nor on each boot.
> What
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: libaec
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Mathis Rosenhauer
* URL : https://www.dkrz.de/redmine/projects/aec
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Adaptive Entropy Co
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 00:41:35 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:42:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:14:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> >
> > > If it's a “severe violation of Debian policy”, the bug is at least
> > > “serious” severity.
> > >
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #805651
Owner: Tobias Frost
Hi Milan,
if you'd like to have a Co-Maintainer for avrdude, please feel free to ping me.
Tobi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ron
Package name: bit-babbler
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Ron Lee
URL : http://www.bitbabbler.org
License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C++, with some Perl for munin and example scripts
Description : BitBab
Hey.
Well the consensus over at linux-btrfs list seems to be:
1) right now it's not yet stable enough (has false positives, etc.)
2) it's very slow
3) btrfs should detect errors by itsel
and thus the suggestion tends towards "don't run it at boot".
(1) should hopefulle be resolved sooner or late
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lucas Kanashiro
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libregexp-stringify-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : perlancar
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Regexp-Stringify
Hi.
I will put all the bugs that I report about this issue here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=binary-indep;users=sanv...@debian.org
So far there are one that I reported 19 days ago as a "test report"
and 162 that I reported today. I'm intentionally excluding packages
having
8 matches
Mail list logo
