On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 22:32 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello again.
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:27:00PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 19:40 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprec
Hi,
(adding debian-boot@, debian-release@ to Cc)
Tobias Frost (2016-01-04):
> Dear debian-devel,
>
> we are currently planning to start the transition of libpng.
> The transition bug can be found here:
> https://bugs.debian.org/650601.
>
> Out of the 463 rebuilt packages 117 FTBFS with the new
On Jan 06, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> (PS. Now if we could only replace net-tools with a similar wrapper
> script and finally deprecate the ioctl based tools there as well. ;P)
We should hunt down and fix the few packages still depending on
net-tools (hello bind9!).
--
ciao,
Marco
signature
Hello again.
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:27:00PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 19:40 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprecated
> > vconfig command causes discussions I've gone ahead and uploaded
>
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 19:40 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprecated
> vconfig command causes discussions I've gone ahead and uploaded
> a new version of the package to experimental. See vlan 2.0 also
> available from https:
Hello.
Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprecated
vconfig command causes discussions I've gone ahead and uploaded
a new version of the package to experimental. See vlan 2.0 also
available from https://people.debian.org/~ah/vlan-2.0/ for the
impatient who doesn't want to w
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 01:35:13PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 06, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> > Do you mean overlayfs? If so can you or anyone vouch for its quality?
> > I had been trying it as a docker storage back end and generally found
> > that it was not ready yet.
> Can you be more
On Jan 06 2016, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Nikolaus Rath writes ("Re: support for merged /usr in Debian"):
>> On Jan 05 2016, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > People who have been using a configuration for many years naturally
>> > become upset when they are told that it has been `unsupported' for all
>> > of t
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 14:28 +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:07:40AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 12:46 +0900, Seyeong Kim wrote:
> > > I checked vlan source http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint
> > > /vlan.git/
> > > debian/network/if-pre-up.
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.general Tobias Frost wrote:
[...]
> (IMHO I'd love to have a real libpng-dev package which depends on the
> real thing; this would enable to version B-Ds on libpng-dev..)
The other option would be versioned provides.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him,
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:55:08PM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> Red hat is mainly for servers nowadays with paying support.
As with many Red Hat features, it was first trialled and proven in Fedora, which
is very much used on Desktops:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
On 01/06/2016 10:40 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 05/01/16 15:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
Abolishing the distinction between /usr and /
"Merged /usr" is not about removing the distinction between /usr and /,
it's about removing the distinction between subdirectories of /usr and
the corresponding sub
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:07:40AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 12:46 +0900, Seyeong Kim wrote:
I checked vlan source http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/vlan.git/
debian/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan, if-post-up.d/vlan …
and not support en* or br* which are quite common
Craig Small writes:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 03:55:51PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> What is causing all the heat is the suggestion that support might be
>> withdrawn for currently working configurations which _do_ have a /usr
>> vs / distinction, or which do mount /usr using / rather than
>> ini
On Jan 06, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Do you mean overlayfs? If so can you or anyone vouch for its quality?
> I had been trying it as a docker storage back end and generally found
> that it was not ready yet.
Can you be more specific? I only use it to test new packages and it
works for me.
e.g. w
Simon McVittie debian.org> writes:
> I personally think those factors undermine the "/ as recovery" use-case
> so far that the advantages of a merged /usr far outweigh it.
User side note: If people would like to help the recovery use case,
grml-rescueboot is already packaged which adds grub integ
Philippe Cerfon writes:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Philippe Cerfon:
>> Your second item has been brought up before with different
>> focus/rationale/purpose. At least I remember there being an interest in
>> splitting "non-free" into "non-free/firmware" vs. various
On 2016-01-04 23:14:11 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 07:45:37AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Your second item has been brought up before with different
> > focus/rationale/purpose. At least I remember there being an interest
> > in splitting "non-free" into "non-fre
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 06:39:36AM -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> No ugly symlinks on root file system, no Bash at /usr/bin/bash!
Aesthetically, I find symlinks for /bin etc., in combination with all
binaries in /usr/bin, to be prettier than the current situation. (I'd
find all binaries in /bin t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-pika-pool
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : egon
* URL : https://github.com/bninja/pika-pool
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Pika connection pooling
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-frozendict
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Santiago Lezica
* URL : https://github.com/slezica/python-frozendict
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : immut
On 2016-01-03 16:54:40 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> The package called "unison2.40.102" version 2.40.102-3+b1 in testing and
> unstable is broken. This broken package is not in stable. If it can't
> get fixed, it probably should get removed.
Yes, I think that it should be removed ASAP. Thus, users of
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:56:24AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> I've backported the two upstream patches that fix this (which amount to
> the same change that your patch does) and have added them with the
> proper metadata attached to them to the git packaging of the policykit
> package.
Thank
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-weakrefmethod
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Tommy Wang
* URL : http://github.com/twang817/weakrefmethod
* License : PSF
Programming Lang: Python
Description : WeakMethod cl
On 05/01/16 09:49, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>> And yet, it works, and it means that we don't have to try to harass a
>> thousand package maintainers into doing essentially untestable busy-work
>> to try to move things around between /usr, /bin, and /
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 06:20:42PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> > https://wiki.debian.org/UsrMerge
>
> Now that we have union mounts in Linux
Do you mean overlayfs? If so can you or anyone vouch for its quality?
I had been trying it as a dock
Am Mittwoch, den 06.01.2016, 01:27 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Rene Engelhard, on Tue 05 Jan 2016 22:15:31 +0100, wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:58:03PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:50:58PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Rene Engelhard, on Tue 05
On 05/01/16 15:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Abolishing the distinction between /usr and /
This seems to be a somewhat frequent point of confusion so, at the risk
of beating a dead horse:
"Merged /usr" is not about removing the distinction between /usr and /,
it's about removing the distinction betwee
28 matches
Mail list logo
