Bug#848645: ITP: node-gulp -- The streaming build system

2016-12-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-gulp Version : 3.9.1 Upstream Author : Fractal (http://wearefractal.com/) * URL : http://gulpjs.com * License : Expat Programming Lang: Ja

Bug#848640: ITP: node-lodash-reevaluate -- The modern build of lodash’s internal `reEvaluate` as a module

2016-12-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-lodash-reevaluate Version : 3.0.0 Upstream Author : John-David Dalton (http://allyoucanleet.com/) * URL : https://lodash.com/ * License : Ex

Bug#848639: ITP: node-lodash-reescape -- The modern build of lodash’s internal `reEscape` as a module

2016-12-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-lodash-reescape Version : 3.0.0 Upstream Author : John-David Dalton (http://allyoucanleet.com/) * URL : https://lodash.com/ * License : Expa

Bug#848629: ITP: golang-gopkg-retry.v1 -- Simple retry mechanism for Go.

2016-12-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Michael Hudson-Doyle" * Package name: golang-gopkg-retry.v1 Version : 0.0~git20161025.0.c09f6b8-1 Upstream Author : Roger Peppe * URL : http://gopkg.in/retry.v1 * License : LGPLv3 Programming Lang: Go Description

Re: [RFC] Enabling bindnow by default in dpkg-buildflags?

2016-12-18 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 09:20:40 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > 2016-12-17 3:14 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover : > > On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 14:05:44 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > >> 2016-12-13 9:29 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey : > >> > 2016-11-27 23:11 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey : > >> >> Lucas already performed the

Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)

2016-12-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > Is there any way to simplify? Remove the obsolete armel binaries where they occur and then mark the packages as NFU on armel: https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals https://wiki.debian.org/PackagesArchSpecific -- bye, pabs https://w

Bug#848591: wanna-build: Only enable --deb-emulate-sbuild for non-backports builds

2016-12-18 Thread James McCoy
Package: buildd.debian.org Tags: patch On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:15:24PM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote: > 2016-12-18 11:38 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > > afaik sbuild strips the alternatives while parsing the .dsc (or > > d/control or whatever), before passing the information to the resolvers, > > so

Bug#848581: ITP: node-gulp-util -- Utility functions for gulp plugins

2016-12-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-gulp-util Version : 3.0.7 Upstream Author : Fractal (http://wearefractal.com/) * URL : https://github.com/gulpjs/gulp-util#readme * License

Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)

2016-12-18 Thread Roger Shimizu
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Wookey wrote: > > We can do poor-mans partial arch by just being fairly agressive about > disabling armel for packages that are broken or not suitable. Not very > clever or efficient, but it is easy to do and requires no infra or > tooling changes at all. So long

Re: depending on libssl1.0-dev, buildd fails to find it

2016-12-18 Thread James McCoy
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 02:26:09PM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > 2016-12-18 14:14 GMT+01:00 James McCoy : > > Well, sbuild's man page documents that the aptitude resolver will check > alternatives. If it doesn't in practice, that sounds like a bug. > > > you need to run sbuild wit

Re: depending on libssl1.0-dev, buildd fails to find it

2016-12-18 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, 2016-12-18 14:14 GMT+01:00 James McCoy : > Well, sbuild's man page documents that the aptitude resolver will check > alternatives. If it doesn't in practice, that sounds like a bug. > you need to run sbuild with "--resolve-alternatives" or add same option in sbuildrc. Imho bug in manpage. -

Re: depending on libssl1.0-dev, buildd fails to find it

2016-12-18 Thread James McCoy
On Dec 18, 2016 05:38, "Mattia Rizzolo" wrote: On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 09:27:12PM -0500, James McCoy wrote: > Now, backports are a different story because they use a different > resolver which will pull in alternates. afaik sbuild strips the alternatives while parsing the .dsc (or d/control or w

Bug#848560: ITP: asterisk-opus -- opus module for Asterisk

2016-12-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 * Package name: asterisk-opus Version : 13.7+20161113 Upstream Author : Lorenzo Miniero * URL : https://github.com/traud/asterisk-opus * License : GPL-2

Re: depending on libssl1.0-dev, buildd fails to find it

2016-12-18 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, 2016-12-18 11:38 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > afaik sbuild strips the alternatives while parsing the .dsc (or > d/control or whatever), before passing the information to the resolvers, > so even if you use another resolver for -bpo you still get the same > behaviour. right: https://buildd.de

Bug#848552: ITP: node-gulplog -- Logger for gulp and gulp plugins

2016-12-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-gulplog Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Blaine Bublitz (http://iceddev.com) * URL : https://github.com/gulpjs/gulplog#readme * License : E

Bug#848550: ITP: node-tildify -- Convert an absolute path to a tilde path

2016-12-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-tildify Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (sindresorhus.com) * URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/tildify#readme * License

Re: depending on libssl1.0-dev, buildd fails to find it

2016-12-18 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 09:27:12PM -0500, James McCoy wrote: > As Arno hinted at, it's to have reliable builds. A transient inability > to install the first arm of an alternation should caused a dep-wait > state, not building with the alternate Build-Depends. which is kinda bullshit, as a differe

Re: depending on libssl1.0-dev, buildd fails to find it

2016-12-18 Thread Sean Whitton
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 09:27:12PM -0500, James McCoy wrote: > Now, backports are a different story because they use a different > resolver which will pull in alternates. That's great to hear. Thanks. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature