Bug#861639: ITP: node-elliptic -- fast elliptic curve cryptography in pure javascript

2017-05-01 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-elliptic Version : 6.4.0 Upstream Author : Fedor Indutny * URL : https://github.com/indutny/elliptic * License : Expat Programming Lang: J

Re: policy for shipping sysctl.d snippets in packages?

2017-05-01 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, 1 May 2017 21:16:33 +1000, Scott Leggett wrote: >On 2017-05-01.13:02, Marc Haber wrote: >> On Mon, 1 May 2017 11:09:26 +0200, Christian Seiler >> wrote: >> >And as I said in other places in this thread: I personally >> >think that the separate /usr <-> /etc scheme is much better >> >than

Re: 132 packages with several sources for stretch in the archiveā€¦ (Re: Bug#860608: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<>/api/next.txt)

2017-05-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:29:30 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:00:20PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > FYI, that's the number of additional copies of source packages in > > stretch, per source package: > > > > udd=> select source, count(*) from sources where release='s

Re: vlc caused upgrade failure

2017-05-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:54:49 +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > Hello, > > I had to uninstall vlc to get jessie upgraded to stretch, this was the key > for the upgrade > Please follow instructions at https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/release-notes/ch-about.en.html#upgrade-reports to

Re: policy for shipping sysctl.d snippets in packages?

2017-05-01 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 11:09:26AM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > My point is just the following: this is really nothing new. > Some packages have been doing things like this for over a > decade. Thanks for coming up with these facts. (Much more interesting than developers of "system A" discus

Re: policy for shipping sysctl.d snippets in packages?

2017-05-01 Thread Christian Seiler
On 05/01/2017 01:02 PM, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, 1 May 2017 11:09:26 +0200, Christian Seiler > wrote: >> And as I said in other places in this thread: I personally >> think that the separate /usr <-> /etc scheme is much better >> than just storing everything in /etc, so I would really >> prefer

Re: policy for shipping sysctl.d snippets in packages?

2017-05-01 Thread Scott Leggett
On 2017-05-01.13:02, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, 1 May 2017 11:09:26 +0200, Christian Seiler > wrote: > >And as I said in other places in this thread: I personally > >think that the separate /usr <-> /etc scheme is much better > >than just storing everything in /etc, so I would really > >prefer if

Re: policy for shipping sysctl.d snippets in packages?

2017-05-01 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, 1 May 2017 11:09:26 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >And as I said in other places in this thread: I personally >think that the separate /usr <-> /etc scheme is much better >than just storing everything in /etc, so I would really >prefer if as much software as possible would switch to that,

Re: policy for shipping sysctl.d snippets in packages?

2017-05-01 Thread Christian Seiler
On 05/01/2017 09:13 AM, Marc Haber wrote: > I find it already disturbing that we have diverged from "our" way in > systemd, which is probably the first package a local admin will be > exposed to. This is nothing new though. For example, DBus has had the /usr and /etc split since as far back as I c

Re: policy for shipping sysctl.d snippets in packages?

2017-05-01 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 20:22:45 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >The original question was "should I install defaults in /etc or /usr?" >to which I replied that in Debian, we've traditionally done the former >rather than the latter, and that the latter feels like a result of an >ecosystem (other than o