Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Tzafir, On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:04:09AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > The top 10 teams with packages in SVN are: > > > > > > 347 Debian Med Packaging Team > > > > > > > This number contains possibly 150 packages that *could* be migrated - > > provided somebody wants to take the t

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

2017-05-17 Thread Medical Wei
But responsive design does not only matters for mobile, it also matters on bigger screen, like high resolution or hi dpi screen, which is what Debian lack of. Like what I said the website is bizarre on a bigger screen. You can try reading the website with the window maximized on 1920x1080 screen.

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-17 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:19:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > In short: There is no doubt that Git is the better VCS but spending > developer time simply to switch lots of packages from an old VCS to a > modern one has zero effect on users desktops and has no high priority. I think that in th

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-17 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:19:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > In short: There is no doubt that Git is the better VCS but spending > developer time simply to switch lots of packages from an old VCS to a > modern one has zero effect on users desktops and has no high priority. I wonder... The pro

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:43:56PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > The top 10 teams with packages in SVN are: > > 347 Debian Med Packaging Team > This number contains possibly 150 packages that *could* be migrated - provided somebody wants to take the time for some unproductive wor

Re: Bug#862775: ITP: visitors -- OCaml syntax extension for object-oriented visitors

2017-05-17 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:28:12AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > * Package name: visitors > > Version : 20170404 > > FYI, there was already a visitors source package in Debian (RMed after > jessie) so I would suggest using a les

Bug#862828: ITP: quorum -- QUality Optimized Reads of genomic sequences

2017-05-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: quorum Version : 1.1.1 Upstream Author : Guillaume Marçais, Aleksey Zimin * URL : https://github.com/gmarcais/Quorum * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : QUality Optimi

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

2017-05-17 Thread Ian Jackson
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)"): > On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 13:33:06 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > * Websites which reorganise themselves through CSS and/or JavScript > >to try to p

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

2017-05-17 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 13:33:06 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > * Websites which reorganise themselves through CSS and/or JavScript >to try to produce a better selection of visibloe bits depending on >the screen size. > >I find these mildly annoying, but I don't use a smartphone and >

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

2017-05-17 Thread Ian Jackson
Steffen Möller writes ("Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)"): > And there is a confusion over "dynamic web sites" (maybe problematic) > with "non-static content" (must have). I don't know what these terms mean.

Bug#862809: ITP: node-set-immediate-shim -- Simple setImmediate shim

2017-05-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-set-immediate-shim Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (sindresorhus.com) * URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/set-immediate-shim * L

Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

2017-05-17 Thread Steffen Möller
On 16/05/2017 07:07, Mechtilde wrote: > these two questions come into my mind: > > What does a "newcomer" expect from > such a website? > what do we expect from a newcomer? > > To go from user to dev is a gliding way. > > "Want To Become Debian Developer" is the last step for a dev not the

Re: Bug#862698: ITP: minecraft -- blocks to build anything you can imagine

2017-05-17 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 16, Simon McVittie wrote: > Yes, that's why I suggested Flatpak. It would also be possible to use > a long bwrap command-line - that's what Flatpak does internally. > One day I should try making game-data-packager's games (mostly the quake > family) use bwrap like that. This would be easie