On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 10:39:30PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> IMHO you should document yourself
> *before* trying something, and I am not even considering firmware at
> all. Or, if you prefer, you should not assume that everything works out
> of the box (in any field, thus not IT-restricted).
Th
Hi there,
On Sat, 02 Dec 2017 13:17:13 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:14:21PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> > > > It would have been best for him to download the ISO with non-free
> > > > firmware embedded, do you know how he made the decision to download
> > > > the
Michael Stone writes:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 09:28:21PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:18:53AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 06:06 +0200, Victor Porton wrote:
For this I need the upstream versions of "python2.7" and "xsltproc".
>>> T
On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 12:16 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:31:09PM +0100, Alf Gaida wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Ian, thats dead easy - put the needed packages onto the iso and be done
> > with. The installer should have an option to opt-in contrib and/or
> > non-free. Done
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 09:28:21PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:18:53AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 06:06 +0200, Victor Porton wrote:
> For this I need the upstream versions of "python2.7" and "xsltproc".
The upstream version of a Debian packa
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:18:53AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 06:06 +0200, Victor Porton wrote:
> > For this I need the upstream versions of "python2.7" and "xsltproc".
>
> The upstream version of a Debian package can be deterministically
> extracted from the package versio
On 2 December 2017 at 11:49, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 12:32:29PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > URL is https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/
> cd-including-firmware/
>
> so who will make nonfree.debian.net and non-free.debian.net
> http-redirect to that U
On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 06:06 +0200, Victor Porton wrote:
> For this I need the upstream versions of "python2.7" and "xsltproc".
The upstream version of a Debian package can be deterministically
extracted from the package version, see https://www.debian.org/doc/debi
an-policy/#s-f-version for the fo
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 12:32:29PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> URL is
> https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/
so who will make nonfree.debian.net and non-free.debian.net
http-redirect to that URL? :)
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Descript
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 12:32:29PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > http://get.debian.org
> > > Might not be beautiful, but it has the needed information, clearly
> > > spelt out.
> >
> > besides that I find that page still too confusing / not simple enough,
> > it also lacks information about t
Actually I am thinking about people with non-free firmware problems to get
additional firmware and download them to another USB disk.
In this way the user don't need to re-download an "non-official" ISO to
install Debian.
But if Policy can allow non-free firmware to go accompany with the ISO it
co
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 10:49:32AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:05:27PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > http://get.debian.org
> > Might not be beautiful, but it has the needed information, clearly
> > spelt out.
>
> besides that I find that page still too confusing / not
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: bitseq
Version : 0.7.5
Upstream Author : Peter Glaus
* URL : https://github.com/BitSeq/BitSeq
* License : Artistic
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Bayesian Inference of Transcrip
On Sat, 02 Dec 2017 at 06:06:29 +0200, Victor Porton wrote:
> A script may be specified by a user of my software by the URL of the
> script and name and version range of the interpreter (simplified
> explanation).
I don't see how a new Upstream-Version field would help you to do this.
Let's suppo
El sáb., 2 de dic. de 2017 a la(s) 05:17, Andrey Rahmatullin <
w...@debian.org> escribió:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:14:21PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> > > > It would have been best for him to download the ISO with non-free
> > > > firmware embedded, do you know how he made the decision to dow
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:05:27PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> http://get.debian.org
> Might not be beautiful, but it has the needed information, clearly
> spelt out.
besides that I find that page still too confusing / not simple enough,
it also lacks information about the non-free images.
--
c
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:14:21PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> > > It would have been best for him to download the ISO with non-free
> > > firmware embedded, do you know how he made the decision to download
> > > the ISO without non-free firmware?
> >
> > Every time I need a Debian ISO, it takes
17 matches
Mail list logo
