Re: Mass bug filing for the removal of freetype-config and freetype.m4

2018-02-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Hugh, On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 11:53:50AM +, Hugh McMaster wrote: > On Friday, 2 February 2018 11:14 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Thu, 01 Feb 2018 at 11:07:42 +, Hugh McMaster wrote: > >> Freetype-config has been considered deprecated for several years [1]. > > By us, or by upstream

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

2018-02-06 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 12:28:54PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:37:44AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > I disagree - reusing file names with different contents in a > > Debian-format archive is IMO always wrong regardless of the time elapsed > > between uses - but it's u

Bug#889785: ITP: libequinox-osgi-java -- Equinox OSGi framework

2018-02-06 Thread Markus Koschany
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany * Package name: libequinox-osgi-java Version : 3.9.1 Upstream Author : IBM Corporation and others * URL : https://www.eclipse.org/equinox/ * License : EPL-1.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : E

Bug#889784: ITP: ldmud -- LPC mud driver (non-free)

2018-02-06 Thread Richard James Salts
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Richard James Salts * Package name: ldmud Version : 3.5.1 Upstream Author : Alexander Motzkau , Dominik Schäfer * URL : http://www.ldmud.eu/ * License : The source code and any executables created may not * be used for

Re: Frustration over Debian naming

2018-02-06 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 06/02/2018 à 21:39, Stéphane Blondon a écrit : > For info, the .svg file in Claudio Filho's repository shows Stretch as > the last release. Sorry, I misread: in the repository, Jessie is stable and Stretch is testing. Stéphane signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Frustration over Debian naming

2018-02-06 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 06/02/2018 à 07:20, Paul Wise a écrit : > Those are all copies of a diagram by Claudio Filho, if anyone updates > it, please send him a pull request to update the official repository: > > http://cfnarede.com.br/en/infographic-of-debian > https://github.com/filhocf/infographics For info, the .

Bug#889744: ITP: mallard-ducktype -- Parser for Ducktype, a lightweight documentation syntax

2018-02-06 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon McVittie * Package name: mallard-ducktype (binaries: ducktype, python3-mallard.ducktype) Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Shaun McCance * URL : http://projectmallard.org/ https://github.com/projectmallar

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

2018-02-06 Thread Chris Lamb
Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Maybe introducing epochs should force a round-trip through NEW... > > Suggested and rejected: https://bugs.debian.org/860797 Somewhat related.. Since version 2.5.61, Lintian warns about epoch changes that are not mentioned in the changelog which should capture any acci

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

2018-02-06 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:34:50PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > That would completely ruin my plan to only ever release version 1.0 of > all of my future projects, but increase the epoch instead. you are very evil indeed. -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

2018-02-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 01:37:43PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:43:17AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > >> > and the version number issue is only an Ubuntu-specific problem (given >

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

2018-02-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 01:31:17PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > This is one of the many situations where I'd like developers to *ask* > > when unsure or uncertain of something. > > So, in fact, the epoch bump was totally useles

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

2018-02-06 Thread Steve McIntyre
Colin Watson wrote: >On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:43:17AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> > and the version number issue is only an Ubuntu-specific problem (given >> > that the original 1.0.51-1 was superseded in 2006). >> >> I agree t

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

2018-02-06 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 13:31 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > This is one of the many situations where I'd like developers to *ask* > > when unsure or uncertain of something. > > So, in fact, the epoch bump was totally useless, and

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

2018-02-06 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: This is one of the many situations where I'd like developers to *ask* when unsure or uncertain of something. So, in fact, the epoch bump was totally useless, and as it often happens in those cases, it's causing headaches for somebody

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

2018-02-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:37:44AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > I disagree - reusing file names with different contents in a > Debian-format archive is IMO always wrong regardless of the time elapsed > between uses - but it's unlikely to be worth arguing. Do you happen to know what was the reason

Bug#889729: ITP: golang-github-muesli-smartcrop -- smartcrop finds good image crops for arbitrary crop sizes

2018-02-06 Thread Anthony Fok
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Anthony Fok * Package name: golang-github-muesli-smartcrop Version : 0.2.0+git20180204.1db4849-1 Upstream Authors: Christian Muehlhaeuser Michael Wendland Bjørn Erik Pedersen * URL : https:

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

2018-02-06 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:43:17AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > and the version number issue is only an Ubuntu-specific problem (given > > that the original 1.0.51-1 was superseded in 2006). > > I agree this is an Ubuntu issue wit