I'm sorry but I don't remember that I have created a repo on alioth.
How can I do for deleting it?
Thanks in advance for any reply.
Pietro Prandini
On mer, 30 mag, 2018 at 10:24 , Alexander Wirt
wrote:
Hi,
we still have 175GiB git repos left on alioth. Please remove them
asap.
Here the
Hi,
I have achieved after 6 years to get adobe relicense type 1 code.
Since 1985 type fonts hinting was not free, now it is free software [1].
The license choosen by adobe is unfortunalty apache 2 and thus not compatible
with GPL2 only.
They are about 7146 fonts that need to be audited and add
On 2018-06-01 01:22 PM, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> The benefit should still be valid. The person responsible for it is
> already looking into it, expect a reply shortly ;)
Great, thanks :)!
--
Alexandre Viau
av...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Owner: Salvatore Bonaccorso
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libppix-quotelike-perl
Version : 0.005
Upstream Author : Thomas R. Wyant III F
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/PP
Hi Holger,
On 01-06-18 20:51, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Do you by chance still have the old changes file and can check whether
> it included the .buildinfo file?
Attached. It does include the .buildinfo file, which was uploaded as the
log file tells me.
Paul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:17:48PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> It helps to spot things. I notice:
>siridb-connector (U)
> which wasn't even in Debian until February this year. Your original list
February 2018 even, ouch
> says:
> siridb-connector needs rebuild (no .buildinfo)
>
> S
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:40:18AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I think this should be relatively easy to compute:
> Indeed — 9182/33705 packages need a rebuild in sid.
> (Full output of following script attached.)
hehe, very nice.
Just the numbers strike me as odd: we currently have
Hi Chris,
On 01-06-18 16:32, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
>>> (Full output of following script attached.)
>>
>> Would it be easy to run dd-list on this and share that as well?
>
> Attached, but…
Thanks.
>> Just in case people care enough to help with rebuilding their
>> own packages (like I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Laurent Baillet
* Package name: libalgorithm-naivebayes-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Ken Williams
* URL : https://metacpan.org/pod/Algorithm::NaiveBayes
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
On 01/06/18 17:31, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> On 2018-05-31 12:33 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> [11] https://wiki.debian.org/MemberBenefits
> Oh, this reminds me of something.
>
> Has anyone gotten replies to their requests sent to
> debian-st...@collabora.com for the Steam subscriptions mentioned in the
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 11:31 -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> On 2018-05-31 12:33 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > [11] https://wiki.debian.org/MemberBenefits
>
> Oh, this reminds me of something.
>
> Has anyone gotten replies to their requests sent to
> debian-st...@collabora.com for the Steam subscripti
Alexandre Viau writes:
> On 2018-05-31 12:33 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> [11] https://wiki.debian.org/MemberBenefits
> Oh, this reminds me of something.
>
> Has anyone gotten replies to their requests sent to
> debian-st...@collabora.com for the Steam subscriptions mentioned in the
> MemberBenefits
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 11:31:02AM -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> On 2018-05-31 12:33 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > [11] https://wiki.debian.org/MemberBenefits
> Oh, this reminds me of something.
>
> Has anyone gotten replies to their requests sent to
> debian-st...@collabora.com for the Steam subscr
On 2018-05-31 12:33 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> [11] https://wiki.debian.org/MemberBenefits
Oh, this reminds me of something.
Has anyone gotten replies to their requests sent to
debian-st...@collabora.com for the Steam subscriptions mentioned in the
MemberBenefits page?
I think that I have sent two
Hello,
On Thu, May 31 2018, k...@negative.plus wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Sorry to butt in,
Thank you for this feedback on your experiences! It's clear you want to
use existing contributors' time as effectively as possible and we
appreciate that.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP s
Dear Yves-Alexis,
> > I can let you know the details privately if you wish, but I'd rather
> > not shout the parties involved from the rooftops
[…]
> No need, thanks. It was merely just to know if the reason was technical or
> not
Thank you for thinking of this. Alas, not all problems can be sol
Hello Ken
El 01/06/18 a las 05:31, Ken escribió:
[...]
>
> (4) Then I decided, working on www is even less mission critical than
> changing code, right? Then I found this on "how-can-I-help --old"
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/766923 - www.debian.org: Who's using Debian page -
> 2014 update
>
Hi Chris,
On 01-06-18 11:40, Chris Lamb wrote:
> (Full output of following script attached.)
Would it be easy to run dd-list on this and share that as well? Just in
case people care enough to help with rebuilding their own packages (like
I would).
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 21:40 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> You did not miss anything; it was not discussed in public.
Ok.
>
> I can let you know the details privately if you wish, but I'd rather
> not shout the parties involved from the rooftops just i
Hi Guillem,
> I think this should be relatively easy to compute:
Indeed — 9182/33705 packages need a rebuild in sid.
(Full output of following script attached.)
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import os
import re
import glob
import bisect
import psycopg2
import collections
from debian import deb822
fr
Thanks Andrey, I stand corrected. I got kicked off #debian-mentors IRC only
because I was on freenode, when the IRC is hosted really on OFTC. -Ken
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On June 1, 2018 7:33 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 03:18:53AM -0400, Ken wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 03:18:53AM -0400, Ken wrote:
> (1) IRC debian-mentors is NOT for mentees to ask question
No, it's the main purpose of that channel.
> and is invite-only
No.
> Unless I have missed some other documents (debian has plenty), I do think the
> community can use one single docu
Want to report on findings since I last emailed:
(1) IRC debian-mentors is NOT for mentees to ask question, and is invite-only
(2) WHEREAS the mailing list debian-mentors (of the same name, ;p) is open and
explicitly described as a place for mentees to seek help. I have just
subscribed.
(3) htt
23 matches
Mail list logo
