More things from other distros (Re: Bug#904019: ITP: libxcrypt -- Extended crypt library for DES, MD5, Blowfish and others)

2018-07-21 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:35:42 +0200 "Marco d'Itri" wrote: > I intend to package the new version of libxcrypt, which will replace the > orphaned libxcrypt source package. > > Some day it may replace crypt(3), currently provided by glibc: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_glibc_libcr

Bug#904228: ITP: python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud -- SakuraCloud plugin for Certbot

2018-07-21 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Harlan Lieberman-Berg * Package name: python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud Version : 0.26.1 Upstream Author : Electronic Frontier Foundation * URL : https://certbot.eff.org * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python De

Bug#904227: ITP: python-certbot-dns-gehirn -- Gehirn DNS plugin for Certbot

2018-07-21 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Harlan Lieberman-Berg * Package name: python-certbot-dns-gehirn Version : 0.21.1 Upstream Author : Electronic Frontier Foundation * URL : https://certbot.eff.org * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python Descrip

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Dmitry Smirnov writes: > With all due respect, you did not research the matter enough and neither > am I... Just as I was checking online dictionaries to see if I've missed > something as terrible as you say, I've found that "boob" is a reference > to "embarrassing mistake" or "foolish or stupid

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 09:39:51AM +0900, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote: > Quack, > > It seems the project is leaving the decision about Weboob onto me, so I'll > try to address it. > > The diversity statement tells me we should welcome others even if they are > very different and with conflicting o

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-21 Thread duck
Quack, On 2018-07-22 09:52, Mike Hommey wrote: but... https://git.weboob.org/weboob/devel/merge_requests/232 Thanks for pointing this out. It's not in yet and I've just asked upstream to clean this mess. \_o< -- Marc Dequènes

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-21 Thread Wookey
On 2018-07-21 12:54 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:34:19PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > I refuse to judge the matter with my feelings. > > Rationality has a place, but so do feelings. > > The names in this package are offensive, plain and simple. _To_some_people_

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-21 Thread duck
Quack, It seems the project is leaving the decision about Weboob onto me, so I'll try to address it. The diversity statement tells me we should welcome others even if they are very different and with conflicting opinions but nothing beyond that. There is no policy part that I found helpful.

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-21 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Friday, 20 July 2018 9:01:45 PM AEST Jonathan Dowland wrote: > Dmitry is not claiming to disagree; he's stating that he doesn't > understand. Excuse me but I have not stated that I don't understand. Disagreement is not the same as not understanding. I think our (only) disagreement is regarding

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-21 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 9:02:15 PM AEST Wouter Verhelst wrote: > It's not an "uncomfortable reference to (a) part of (the) human body". > It's a wholly inappropriate reference to a part of the *female* body > often associated with sex, which therefore is a mysogynistic and > demeaning reference t

Re: MemberBenefits - Steam Keys (Was: Bits from the DPL (May 2018))

2018-07-21 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello everyone, I sent an email on 1st June (when this thread started) to debian-steam[a] collabora.com requesting it but got no response. Is it still going? Did you receive a reply Alexandre? Thanks On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 at 16:10, Alexandre Viau wrote: > On 2018-06-01 01:22 PM, Andrej Shadura w

Bug#904224: ITP: feathernotes -- FeatherNotes is a lightweight Qt5 hierarchical notes-manager for Linux. It is independent of any desktop environment.

2018-07-21 Thread Alf Gaida
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alf Gaida * Package name: feathernotes Version : 0.4.5 Upstream Author : Pedram Pourang, a.k.a. Tsu Jan tsujan2...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/tsujan/FeatherNotes * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Descrip

Bug#904222: ITP: puppet-module-voxpupuli-corosync -- Puppet module for corosync / pacemaker

2018-07-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: puppet-module-voxpupuli-corosync Version : 5.0.0 Upstream Author : Puppet Labs Inc * URL : https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-corosync * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Puppet De

Bug#904205: ITP: adapta-kde -- Port of the popular Gtk theme Adapta for Plasma 5 desktop

2018-07-21 Thread Franciscarlos Soares
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Franciscarlos Soares * Package name: adapta-kde Version : 20180618 Upstream Author : Alexey Varfolomeev * URL : https://github.com/PapirusDevelopmentTeam/adapta-kde * License : (GPL-3.0+ Programming Lang: N/A Descrip

Re: Bug#904019: ITP: libxcrypt -- Extended crypt library for DES, MD5, Blowfish and others

2018-07-21 Thread Michael Stone
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 02:35:59AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: I think you can do something like: [...] # postinst time: use link & rename to replace working version atomically. It's technically possible, but AFAICT a policy violation. Mike Stone

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-21 Thread Ian Jackson
Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?"): > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:34:28AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > The current policy[1] leaves it up to the maintainers to make this > > judgement and I don't think a discussion on -devel@ will reach a > > consensus tha

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-21 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:02:23PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Thursday, 19 July 2018 7:43:39 PM AEST Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > weboob itself is fine, maybe. But there are various other binaries > > inside the weboob packages that aren't, at least not so much: > > > > wetboobs > > handjoob

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-21 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:34:28AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Matthew Vernon writes: > > We shouldn't need to have numbers of people having to justify why a > > particular thing is offensive before we (as a project) try and fix > > it. > > That works if Debian was a non-diverse groups where

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

2018-07-21 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:34:19PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > I refuse to judge the matter with my feelings. Rationality has a place, but so do feelings. The names in this package are offensive, plain and simple. Are other names offensive? Maybe. Does that mean we should do nothing until we'v

Bug#904186: ITP: git-sizer -- compute various size metrics for a Git repository

2018-07-21 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry Smirnov X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Package name: git-sizer Version: 1.2.0 Upstream Author: GitHub License: Expat URL: https://github.com/github/git-sizer