Le jeudi 23 août 2018 à 06:59:45+0200, Alec Leamas a écrit :
> [may I keep bundled libraries?]
Hi Alec,
Please note that I'm a little new to the Policy and these packaging
questions, so my thoughts probably require to be confirmed by a more
experimented person.
Per Debian's Policy section 4.13[1
Le jeudi 23 août 2018 à 07:01:21+0200, Alexander Wirt a écrit :
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > in the face of the current spam attacks I implemented CertFP for my
> > > irker instance. I also updated the default irc li
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > in the face of the current spam attacks I implemented CertFP for my
> > irker instance. I also updated the default irc link in gitlab. However,
> > it is possible that every project using the bot has
Dear list,
Still investigating packaging opencpn[1]. In this context I have looked
into the bundling [2].
Here is some libraries to unbundle; this could certainly could be done,
However, the core issue is a few libraries which cannot realistically be
unbundled. One example is mygdal, a heavily pa
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> in the face of the current spam attacks I implemented CertFP for my
> irker instance. I also updated the default irc link in gitlab. However,
> it is possible that every project using the bot has to migrate the server
> setting to ssl. So if you mi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Felix Lechner
* Package name: golang-github-xanzy-go-gitlab
Version : 0.10.8
Upstream Author : Sander van Harmelen
* URL : https://github.com/xanzy/go-github/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ruben Undheim
* Package name: gr-dab
Version : 0.1? (to be released)
Upstream Author : Andreas Müller, Moritz Luca Schmid etc.
* URL : https://github.com/andrmuel/gr-dab
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++, Python
Hello,
I am working on fixing bug #905178 which is caused by moving away from using ucf
to manage /etc/default/apt-cacher back to handling it as a standard dpkg
conffile.
I have a working solution which avoids unnecessary prompting. This is to remove
the ucf version of the file in the preinst unl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emanuele Rocca
* Package name: prometheus-trafficserver-exporter
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Greg Dallavalle
* URL : https://github.com/gdvalle/trafficserver_exporter
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Pytho
Hi Robert,
> RedisLabs have changed the license of various modules to be
> incompatible with DFSG guideline 6: the 'Common Clause' rider.
>
> https://redislabs.com/community/commons-clause/
>
> Some examples - redis-timeseries, redisearch, rejson, [..]
Filed RC bug for src:redisearch as #906920
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:49:28 +0200, Dashamir Hoxha
wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 9:09 AM Carsten Schoenert
>wrote:
>> This is the third ITP about 'pw'. The last one has produced a longish
>> thread on d-d.
>>
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/07/msg00199.html
>>
>> The information a
Hi,
2018年8月21日(火) 14:39 Paul Wise :
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Kentaro Hayashi wrote:
>
> > I want to make 3rd party keyring package (ITP). In the advance, I
> > want to know a best practice about *keyring* packaging. Any hints?
>
> There are some best practices for using 3rd party apt r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Smirnov
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: affects -1 golang-github-appc-cni
Package name: golang-github-j-keck-arping
Version: 0.0~git20160618
Upstream Author: Jürgen Keck
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 9:09 AM Carsten Schoenert
wrote:
> This is the third ITP about 'pw'. The last one has produced a longish
> thread on d-d.
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/07/msg00199.html
>
> The information about this new ITP says nothing about the addressed
> concerns from
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 01:02:30PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
> RedisLabs have changed the license of various modules to be
> incompatible with DFSG guideline 6: the 'Common Clause' rider.
>
> https://redislabs.com/community/commons-clause/
"Therefore, the no-sale restriction imposed by Commons
This is the third ITP about 'pw'. The last one has produced a longish
thread on d-d.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/07/msg00199.html
The information about this new ITP says nothing about the addressed
concerns from the last one. What has been changed since then that would
qualify this
16 matches
Mail list logo
