Package not compatible with old systemd

2018-09-18 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, my package src:swift is not compatible with old systemd, because I'm using CacheDirectory in unit file. CacheDirectory is supported from systemd 235. I think correct solution is to add to binary package this relation: Breaks: systemd (<< 235~) Thomas Goirand (zigo) said it's wrong and correc

Re: Package not compatible with old systemd

2018-09-18 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:21:11AM +0200, Ondrej Novy wrote: > I think my solution is correct, because Swift works with any init system > and I want to only say "it doesn't work with older systemd". I don't think > it's correct to list all possible init systems in Depends. Would Conflicts work her

Re: Package not compatible with old systemd

2018-09-18 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, út 18. 9. 2018 v 10:30 odesílatel Lars Wirzenius napsal: > Would Conflicts work here? > Conflicts is just more strict Breaks, for example when files are overwritten. This is not case and Breaks "is enough". -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5

Re: Package not compatible with old systemd

2018-09-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 18.09.18 um 09:21 schrieb Ondrej Novy: > Hi, > > my package src:swift is not compatible with old systemd, because I'm > using CacheDirectory in unit file. CacheDirectory is supported from > systemd 235. > > I think correct solution is to add to binary package this relation: > Breaks: systemd (

Re: Package not compatible with old systemd

2018-09-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 18.09.18 um 12:00 schrieb Michael Biebl: > I assume you (re)start your service in postinst? In this case you need a > running systemd >= 235 at that point. > We do re-exec systemd in postinst, but a versioned Breaks or Conflicts > does not give you the guarantee that systemd.postinst has run bef

Re: Package not compatible with old systemd

2018-09-18 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, út 18. 9. 2018 v 12:18 odesílatel Michael Biebl napsal: > assume you (re)start your service in postinst? In this case you need a > running systemd >= 235 at that point. > yes. > We do re-exec systemd in postinst, but a versioned Breaks or Conflicts > does not give you the guarantee that

Re: Package not compatible with old systemd

2018-09-18 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, út 18. 9. 2018 v 12:27 odesílatel Michael Biebl napsal: > Fwiw, we had a similar issue in udev, see > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903224 > for the gory details. > thanks. > Have you tried running your swift service with an older (say v232 from > stable) systemd? > Do

Bug#909133: ITP: auto-dictionary-el -- automatic dictionary switcher for Emacs spell checking

2018-09-18 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicholas D Steeves Package name: auto-dictionary-el Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Nikolaj Schumacher URL : https://wiki.debian.org/EmacsenTeam/Team License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: elisp Description : automatic dictio

Urgent Please.

2018-09-18 Thread Sean Kim
Hello dear, Did you receive my email message to you? Please, get back to me ASAP as the matter is becoming late. Expecting your urgent response. Regards, Sean --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com