Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: golang-github-maraino-go-mock
Version : 0.0~git20180321.4c74c43-1
Upstream Author : Mariano Cano
* URL : https://github.com/maraino/go-mock
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Descrip
Hi Bastian
I sponsored Lumin's original upload of Julia 1.0.0-1 and worked with him
closely, reviewing the commits leading up to the upload. In the
meantime, Lumin has become a Debian Developer and uploaded the
subsequent versions himself, although still with some input and testing
from me.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:52:41PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> I thought Lumin had made it clear enough that being able to obtain a
> stacktrace from within Julia is actually a feature [1]. One of Julia's
> tests checks this, and hence autopkgtests fail if debug symbols are missing
> from sys.so,
Lumin writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"):
> 1. Isn't "incomplete backtrace" a sensible reason to keep debug symbols?
>Policy said "should" but not "must". Please tell me what I can do in
>order to help improve the src:julia package to satisfy the requirements?
My main conc
Graham Inggs writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"):
> I thought Lumin had made it clear enough that being able to obtain a
> stacktrace from within Julia is actually a feature [1]. One of Julia's
> tests checks this, and hence autopkgtests fail if debug symbols are
> missing from
Hi Andrey
On 26/09/2018 13:13, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
It's not clear why the debug symbols are necessary to be in the binary and
not detached as with most other binaries in the archive.
I believe the debug symbols can be detached, but we would still need to
depend on them, so I don't think
Hi there, (CC -devel FYI)
Whilst chasing down a bug I noticed rss2email seems to be in a little
bit of trouble. I see it is not team-maintained, you are not listed
as LowThresholdNMU and it has not been updated since at least the Alioth
VCS URIs were turned off.
Would you be happy to collaborati
Emailing both debian-devel and the Debian GNOME mailing list.
I am requesting project approval for me to upload gnome-calculator
with an epoch.
Five years ago, gcalctool 6.4 was renamed to gnome-calculator and
renumbered to 3.8. This seemed like a clear case for an epoch since
this was a permanen
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 07:45:45 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> The yesteday uploaded Developer's Reference has now got a chapter
> about "Package Salvaging". [1]
That's excellent news. Thanks Tobi for driving this inititiative!
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Devel
Dear all,
I just encountered some weird problem around installing bumblebee-nvidia using
apt and aptitude on Debian Unstable. Here's what I did:
$ sudo apt purge '*nvidia*'
$ sudo apt autoremove --purge
$ sudo apt update
$ dpkg --print-architecture
amd64
$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
i386
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: jbi...@debian.org
Package Name: gnome-remote-desktop
Version: 0.1.6
Upstream Authors: Jonas Ådahl, Red Hat
License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Homepage: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Mutter/RemoteDesktop
Descrip
Quoting Jeremy Bicha (2018-09-26 15:47:38)
> Emailing both debian-devel and the Debian GNOME mailing list.
>
> I am requesting project approval for me to upload gnome-calculator
> with an epoch.
>
> Five years ago, gcalctool 6.4 was renamed to gnome-calculator and
> renumbered to 3.8. This seemed
Gregor wrote:
> > The yesteday uploaded Developer's Reference has now got a chapter
> > about "Package Salvaging". [1]
>
> That's excellent news. Thanks Tobi for driving this inititiative!
Indeed — congratulations and thank you for seeing this all the way
through.
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
Tobias Frost wrote on 26/09/2018:
> The yesteday uploaded Developer's Reference has now got a chapter
> about "Package Salvaging".
Thanks Tobias for this work, I truly think Debian will benefit a lot
from it. I already filed an ITS: #909663. The Developer's Reference was
smooth to follow, I just
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: equinox-p2
Version : 4.7.3
Upstream Author : Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
* URL : http://www.eclipse.org/equinox/p2/
* License : EPL-1.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Provisioning
On 2018-09-26 10:38 -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> I just encountered some weird problem around installing bumblebee-nvidia
> using
> apt and aptitude on Debian Unstable. Here's what I did:
>
> $ sudo apt purge '*nvidia*'
> $ sudo apt autoremove --purge
> $ sudo apt update
> $ dpkg --print-architec
Hi,
Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote:
> installation-guide 20180603 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
> 2018-10-11
>
> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> 898665: installation-guide: [installation-guide] change "Alioth" and "svn" to
> "Salsa" and "git"
we got this note today.
Ho
Am 26.09.2018 um 19:50 schrieb Holger Wansing:
> Hi,
>
> Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote:
>> installation-guide 20180603 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
>> 2018-10-11
>>
>> It is affected by these RC bugs:
>> 898665: installation-guide: [installation-guide] change "Alioth" and "
Michael Biebl, le mer. 26 sept. 2018 19:53:22 +0200, a ecrit:
> Am 26.09.2018 um 19:50 schrieb Holger Wansing:
> > Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote:
> >> installation-guide 20180603 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
> >> 2018-10-11
> >>
> >> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> >> 898
Hi Russ,
Just checked it. Yes, apt upgrade does upgrade successfully. Thank you so much.
My whole question is mute now.
Regards
Mohan
Tobias Frost:
> Hallo everyone,
>
> The yesteday uploaded Developer's Reference has now got a chapter
> about "Package Salvaging". [1]
>
> So, package salvaging is now implemented and ready to be used,
> and whenever you find some package in need, you can now consider to
> salvage it for the bene
Let's salvaging developers.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:14 PM Chris Knadle wrote:
>
> Tobias Frost:
> > Hallo everyone,
> >
> > The yesteday uploaded Developer's Reference has now got a chapter
> > about "Package Salvaging". [1]
> >
> > So, package salvaging is now implemented and ready to be used,
Hi all
Seriously, this is the wrong approach.
I am the upstream of a package. I have dependencies but am unsure
about how to monetize
my software or fund my dependencies.
Might be I decide once to stop work full-time on it. Just because
someone feels uncomfortable
about the situation of a partic
Hey Jonas
On 26/09/2018 16:59, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> More recently, I have worked to reduce the difference between Debian
>> and Ubuntu packaging for many GNOME packages. It gets very tedious to
>> need to upload gnome-calculator in Debian and then do a separate
>> upload in Ubuntu (along wit
Joël Krähemann:
> Hi all
>
> Seriously, this is the wrong approach.
>
> I am the upstream of a package. I have dependencies but am unsure
> about how to monetize my software or fund my dependencies.
>
> Might be I decide once to stop work full-time on it. Just because
> someone feels uncomfortab
Am 26.09.2018 um 15:47 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
> So is it appropriate to bump an epoch in Debian to match an important
> downstream's epoch?
I don't think it is.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Des
Hi Jonathan, and Jeremy and others,
Quoting Jonathan Carter (2018-09-26 20:45:13)
> On 26/09/2018 16:59, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> More recently, I have worked to reduce the difference between Debian
>>> and Ubuntu packaging for many GNOME packages. It gets very tedious
>>> to need to upload g
Hi,
I want the following patch to be back ported to 4.9 kernel. Can you please let
me know if it can be back ported to 4.9 kernel?
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/63a6fff353d01da5a22b72670c434bf12fa0e3b8
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:48 PM Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> A month later, a Debian GNOME team member recognized that we could use
> a dh_gencontrol hack [1] to only add the epoch to the gcalctool
> transitional package and we didn't need an epoch for gnome-calculator.
I wouldn't characterise this as a
[Note Reply-to: debian-kernel.]
On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 18:00 +, Harish Venkatraman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want the following patch to be back ported to 4.9 kernel. Can you
> please let me know if it can be back ported to 4.9 kernel?
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/63a6fff353d01da5a22
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:33 PM Paul Wise wrote:
> FTR, this is currently this set of changes:
>
> https://patches.ubuntu.com/g/gnome-calculator/gnome-calculator_1:3.30.0-1ubuntu1.patch
Yes, I felt my email was getting a bit long. Ubuntu's gnome-calculator
now has some patches that depend on prop
Hi Jeremy,
My comments below for what it's worth. You should likely not
take anything I say too seriously, but maybe I happen to mention
something that can be food for thought.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:47:38AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Emailing both debian-devel and the Debian GNOME mailing
32 matches
Mail list logo
