On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 07:50:55PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > Then, they should click on the button they are asked to click. This
> > takes far less time than a long (and discourteous) rant.
>
> Yeah... you walk out without a word, and are upset i
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:54:10PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 07:07:36PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Mattia Rizzolo writes:
> > > On the other hand, most of my reply to willy's mail was not addressed to
> > > him, but to debian-devel@ at large, […]
> >
> > The gene
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 10:41:41PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 07:50:55PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > I know you have good intention in trying to improve the MIA process, but
> > I think[*] this sends the wrong message to the current volunteers: you
> > can act as pro
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 02:56:14PM -0500, Chris Lamb wrote:
> I would be surprised if there were no topics or issues for you
> (including outside of the free software world) where reacting in a
> ungentlemanly manner is likely given some history or context.
I naturally had my own cases of "ungentl
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:23:49AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > So I hope you'll grit your teeth and keep going. You may end up as grumpy
> > as formorer -- but, notably, he still hasn't stopped his thankless unpaid
> > work. Yes, every time you con
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 7:46 AM Adam Borowski wrote:
> It's social people who put nice forms of speech above actual merit, and
> I'm for one anything but social.
It sounds to me like you're implying that niceness does not have
actual merit in itself. I think that opinion goes against the spirit
o
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 01:46:34PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> It's social people who put nice forms of speech above actual merit, and
> I'm for one anything but social. What I want is for lists to be kept in a
> good shape, a job that you're doing superbly. You have (almost certainly
> unconsc
[replying directly]
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> […] for some reason always involving some German DD, even worse if
> there are multiple ones […]
https://i.imgur.com/PoWwX7m.png
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Chris Lamb wrote:
> [replying directly]
Or not! Enjoy our sub-conversation, -devel. :)
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 09:29:29PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Leave me alone. Your project left me long ago. Do not contact me with
> > regard to Debian bullshit.
>
> ACK, we will have DAM remove you instead of retire. I suppose there is
> no harm as you don't seem interested in the "bene
Colin Watson writes ("Re: salsa.debian.org: merge requests and such"):
> Honestly, I think it's better for Debian as a whole that people should
> be able to do that kind of bulk cleanup with absolutely minimal
> friction,
I absolutely agree.
The disruption from this kind of thing is minimal, and
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: I resigned in 2004"):
> "Never contact me again" is what one is supposed to tell someone if they
> feel like they're being harassed. It's the sort of thing that I do think
> we want to try to honor unless we have some reasonable reason to believe
> that something weird is
On 12/11/2018 13:02, Ian Jackson wrote:
Colin Watson writes ("Re: salsa.debian.org: merge requests and such"):
Honestly, I think it's better for Debian as a whole that people should
be able to do that kind of bulk cleanup with absolutely minimal
friction,
I absolutely agree.
The disruption fr
]] Vincent Bernat
> ❦ 11 novembre 2018 19:20 +0100, Wouter Verhelst :
>
> > Meanwhile, it makes sense to be courteous to people who were a DD once
> > but really couldn't care less now and want to get rid of the nagging,
> > which seems like a far more likely scenario.
>
> Then, they should cl
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:47:41PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> (I also wonder if we should just require people to opt in to their
> DD-ship on a yearly basis instead of doing most of the WAT/MIA dance. If
> people can't be bothered to reply to a single email saying «yup, another
> year pleas
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: fever
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : DCSO GmbH
* URL : https://github.com/DCSO/fever
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Description : fast, extensible, versatile event
Tollef Fog Heen :
> (I also wonder if we should just require people to opt in to their
> DD-ship on a yearly basis instead of doing most of the WAT/MIA dance. If
> people can't be bothered to reply to a single email saying «yup, another
> year please» with some reasonable amount of pinging and time
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:43:20PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen :
> > (I also wonder if we should just require people to opt in to their
> > DD-ship on a yearly basis instead of doing most of the WAT/MIA dance. If
> > people can't be bothered to reply to a single email saying «yup
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:43:20PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Tollef Fog Heen :
(I also wonder if we should just require people to opt in to their
DD-ship on a yearly basis instead of doing most of the WAT/MIA dance. If
people can't be bothered to reply to a single email saying «yup, another
y
Hi,
I am deeply sorry if I'm on the wrong list. I am not a newcomer to
Debian, but I didn't take the time to dig in all the lists and processes.
Recently, I saw some PHP modules that hit testing and were only compiled
against PHP 7.3:
- php-apcu (#911719)
- php-igbinary (#911670)
- php-redis (
On Nov 12, bugs-deb...@antipoul.fr wrote:
> modules. As far as I know, some applications are not able to run on PHP
> 7.3, so supporting PHP 7.2 in buster could be a good idea.
This is not going to happen for reasons that have been explained
multiple times, even if everybody knows that if you are
On 2018-11-12 19:47 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> (I also wonder if we should just require people to opt in to their
> DD-ship on a yearly basis instead of doing most of the WAT/MIA dance. If
> people can't be bothered to reply to a single email saying «yup, another
> year please» with some reas
On 12/11/2018 20:47, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:43:20PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> Tollef Fog Heen :
>>> (I also wonder if we should just require people to opt in to their
>>> DD-ship on a yearly basis instead of doing most of the WAT/MIA dance. If
>>> people can't be b
23 matches
Mail list logo
