Re: Official non-official Debian backporting versioning scheme

On Sunday, May 19, 2019 3:41:59 PM EDT Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > I would like to ask/get a consensus on a sensible "official > non-official" Debian backporting version scheme for 3rd party > packages. > > The goal is to be able to provide non-official packages that do > integra

Re: NMUs: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 03:22:16PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 02:09:14PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 15.05.2019, 11:31 +0200 schrieb Enrico Zini: Or introduce a lintian check for not using dh. Then the maintainer could override lintian and document t

Re: NMUs: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:31:46AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: >... > - if a package has had an inactive and unresponsive maintainer for a >long time, it would indeed be a case for salvaging. > >I could however imagine someone having enough energy to dust off old >packages in the archiv

Bug#929258: ITP: ruby-zeitwerk -- Efficient and thread-safe constant autoloader

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jongmin Kim * Package name: ruby-zeitwerk Version : 2.1.6 Upstream Author : Xavier Noria * URL : https://github.com/fxn/zeitwerk * License : Expat Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Efficient and thread-safe co