Re: Bug email to Maintainer, not Uploader?

2020-02-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2020-02-22 at 22:40 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Honestly though, I don't think going and clicking "subscribe" in a "few > dozens" package pages is too much. It looks like we have a pts-subscribe command in devscripts these days, so it can also be scripted. (I've never used it, just spot

Re: Bug email to Maintainer, not Uploader?

2020-02-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Adam Borowski (2020-02-23 01:25:07) > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:40:56PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Honestly though, I don't think going and clicking "subscribe" in a "few > > dozens" package pages is too much. > > That'd be acceptable if you could do so all at one time. But most of

Re: Bug email to Maintainer, not Uploader?

2020-02-22 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:40:56PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Honestly though, I don't think going and clicking "subscribe" in a "few > dozens" package pages is too much. That'd be acceptable if you could do so all at one time. But most of us don't gain a package more often than once per a fe

Re: Bug email to Maintainer, not Uploader?

2020-02-22 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 12:35:14PM -0600, Steven Robbins wrote: > On Saturday, February 22, 2020 10:15:28 A.M. CST Steven Robbins wrote: > > I'm not receiving messages concerning bugs for most of the packages I > > maintain. Most of my packages are team-maintained, so my email appears only > > as

Re: Bug email to Maintainer, not Uploader?

2020-02-22 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 12:35:14PM -0600, Steven Robbins wrote: > 1. Subscribe to the Maintainer ML would produce an enormous amount of spam. > The maintainer is Debian-Science, which is listed in 790 packages, of which I > care about maybe 10. You could do that coupled with some mail filtering

Re: Bug email to Maintainer, not Uploader?

2020-02-22 Thread Steven Robbins
On Saturday, February 22, 2020 10:15:28 A.M. CST Steven Robbins wrote: > I'm not receiving messages concerning bugs for most of the packages I > maintain. Most of my packages are team-maintained, so my email appears only > as the Uploader, not the Maintainer. I am beginning to suspect this is >

Re: Bug email to Maintainer, not Uploader?

2020-02-22 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:15:28AM -0600, Steven Robbins wrote: > Most of my packages are team-maintained, so my email appears only > as the Uploader, not the Maintainer. I am beginning to suspect this is the > cause of missing emails. Is it? Yes, nothing mails Uploaders. > Is there a global

Bug email to Maintainer, not Uploader?

2020-02-22 Thread Steven Robbins
I'm not receiving messages concerning bugs for most of the packages I maintain. Most of my packages are team-maintained, so my email appears only as the Uploader, not the Maintainer. I am beginning to suspect this is the cause of missing emails. Is it? Is there a global method to inform bts

Re: Is there still a point in installing libgcrypt to /lib instead of /usr/lib

2020-02-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* Ansgar: > On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 09:39 +, Simon McVittie wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 09:31:51 +, Simon McVittie wrote: >> > I agree that what Guillem is proposing also does not have the property, >> > which I think is one that is important to you?, that the contents of the >> > root