Bug#956343: ITP: dateparse -- GoLang Parse many date strings without knowing format in advance

2020-04-09 Thread Alois Micard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alois Micard * Package name: dateparse Version : 0.0~git20200409.d820a61-1 Upstream Author : Aaron Raddon * URL : https://github.com/araddon/dateparse * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description : GoLang P

Bug#956340: ITP: golang-github-scylladb-termtables -- Fork of github.com/apcera/termtables

2020-04-09 Thread Alois Micard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Aloïs Micard * Package name: golang-github-scylladb-termtables Version : 0.0~git20191203.c4c0b6d-1 Upstream Author : ScyllaDB * URL : https://github.com/scylladb/termtables * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go

Bug#956331: ITP: jekyll-theme-minima -- beautiful, minimal theme for jekyll

2020-04-09 Thread Daniel Leidert
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Daniel Leidert -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: jekyll-theme-minima Version : 2.5.1 Upstream Author : Parker Moore * URL : https://jekyll.github.io/minima/ * License : MIT Programming Lan

Work-needing packages report for Apr 10, 2020

2020-04-09 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 1212 (new: 9) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 223 (new: 0) Total number of packages reques

Re: OpenStack release & Debian [was: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional?]

2020-04-09 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2020-04-09 22:27:31 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 4/9/20 6:09 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...] > > for example I anticipate an interest in expiring releases > > prior to the current one a bit faster because it will mean not > > having to continue supporting Python 2.7 within the test

Re: OpenStack release & Debian [was: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional?]

2020-04-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 4/9/20 6:09 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Yep, at the moment it's running around the 3-year mark where the > community ceases to be able to maintain extensive integration > testing any longer 3 years is already helping a lot. I clearly remember a few Debian release ago that the OpenStack release

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

2020-04-09 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2020-04-09 09:42:28 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] > I agree with all what you wrote above. However, there's still no > LTS release in OpenStack, unfortunately. I can support Debian > stable, though I have (understandably) given up on oldstable, yet > even on Debian LTS. Yep, at the

Bug#956303: ITP: apkparser -- APK manifest & resources parsing in Golang.

2020-04-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hans-Christoph Steiner * Package name: apkparser Version : 0.0~git20200402.9fd46d5-1 Upstream Author : Avast * URL : https://github.com/avast/apkparser * License : LGPL-3.0 Programming Lang: Go Description : APK m

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

2020-04-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 4/8/20 11:25 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2020-04-08 22:36:17 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: > [...] >> Also, the docker world is not the only one to be this way. It used to be >> like this in OpenStack too. In the OpenStack world, they haven't changed >> the way they release (ie: every

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

2020-04-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 4/8/20 10:58 PM, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:36:17PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> I don't agree with this *at all*. It is not in the interest of our users >> to be forced to update the software they use for their infrastructure >> every few months. > > Isn't that the us

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

2020-04-09 Thread Tomas Pospisek
On 09.04.20 08:47, Thomas Goirand wrote: > As a user, I'd prefer Kubernets to be in Stable if possible. I'd be one > of these users who don't care about the latest shiny feature, and prefer > something stable, supported for YEARS to come, not just 3 months. To give a datapoint: Kubernetes as a S