On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:36 PM RhineDevil wrote:
> Sounds a nice idea in theory but the -v command as shown in
> https://manpages.debian.org/buster/sbuild/sbuild.1.en.html is already
> occupied by "version"...
sbuild accepts long options, but in any case sbuild should not be
involved here, si
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:59 AM Iustin Pop wrote:
> Asking for people who have experience as Debian developers and who are
> annoyed by the Ubuntu bug count in the QA (debian) page.
BTW, the #debian-ubuntu OFTC IRC channel is useful for this sort of question.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.
Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:47:42 + Simon McVittie :
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 at 20:33:22 +0100, RhineDevil wrote:
> > I ask the teams responsible for sbuild and debootstrap development
> > permission to integrate these changes
>
> If you have made changes to sbuild and debootstrap and you want those
> c
Hallo Steve McIntyre,
29.11.20 20:21 Steve McIntyre:
> On and off, I've been hacking on tasksel for quite a while to improve
> the UI there and add better support for things like Blends. I've made
> some progress in my hacking, but I think I've hit a brick wall and I
> need to change tack. :-/
>
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 07:21:54PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On and off, I've been hacking on tasksel for quite a while to improve
> the UI there and add better support for things like Blends. I've made
> some progress in my hacking, but I think I've hit a brick wall and I
> need to change tac
On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 at 20:33:22 +0100, RhineDevil wrote:
> I ask the teams responsible for sbuild and debootstrap development
> permission to integrate these changes
If you have made changes to sbuild and debootstrap and you want those
changes to be merged, the way to make that happen is to open b
On 11/29/20 10:11 AM, Paride Legovini wrote:
> I tried to do a synthesis of past August/September thread on the
> finalization of DEP-14 [1], see:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/1/diffs
This all looks great to me!
> I tried to stick to what I believe we had consensus
On 11/29/20 1:33 PM, RhineDevil wrote:
> A viable solution for achieving this may be using an optional -f/--flavour
> parameter
Is flavour intended to be something like Debian vs. Devuan vs. Ubuntu?
If so, could you please use "vendor" instead, since that is the
pre-existing term for that distinc
As now sbuild and debootstrap manage chroots on per-suite basis, they rely on
scripts present in /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts.
This poses a problem, as suite names from different distros may occasionally
overlap, as happened with debian/devuan jessie.
After the split Debian continued to use its
Hey folks,
On and off, I've been hacking on tasksel for quite a while to improve
the UI there and add better support for things like Blends. I've made
some progress in my hacking, but I think I've hit a brick wall and I
need to change tack. :-/
What I've ended up doing so far is hacking tasksel t
[Resent as debian-devel doesn't allow attachments.]
Hello,
I tried to do a synthesis of past August/September thread on the
finalization of DEP-14 [1], see:
https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/1/diffs
I took Raphaël's proposal [1] and integrated the following changes:
(1
Hi,
Quoting Raphael Hertzog (2020-11-29 15:24:01)
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2020, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> > The resulting tarball can then be used with the sbuild unshare backend. The
> > only time you need be root is to execute
> >
> > $ sudo sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_userns_clo
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 autopkgtest
Control: retitle -2 "autopkgtest: implement a podman backend"
Control: block -1 by -2
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Nov 2020, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> The resulting tarball can then be used with the sbuild unshare backend. The
> only time yo
On 2020-11-29 14:06:31, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> For the sake of disclosure, I'm also an Ubuntu Developer.
>
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:58:53PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > I have a Launchpad account, and the project itself lists my Launchpad
> > account as "maintainer", but on th
Hello all,
For the sake of disclosure, I'm also an Ubuntu Developer.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:58:53PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
> I have a Launchpad account, and the project itself lists my Launchpad
> account as "maintainer", but on the bug itself I can't mark it as "Won't
> fix", only as "Inva
Hi all,
Asking for people who have experience as Debian developers and who are
annoyed by the Ubuntu bug count in the QA (debian) page. These bugs are
trivial/minor, but still, I'd like to clean up.
Let's take for example
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pylibacl/+bug/1876350.
I h
On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 at 12:33:22 +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> What I would like even more, would be to add a podman backend to autopkgtest.
> This has the following advantages:
>
> - it would already work with sbuild today (no changes in sbuild required)
> - no duplicated work
Hi,
Quoting Raphaël Hertzog (2020-11-29 11:42:16)
> I know that multiple developers started using podman and buildah to manage
> containers where they build their Debian packages. With user namespace
> supports, this allows rootless building (like the "unshare" chroot
> mode)... you don't even nee
18 matches
Mail list logo
