Control: reassign -1 wnpp
On Lu, 25 ian 21, 23:30:34, 2board.admin wrote:
> Package: luksman
> Version: 1.0.0
> Severity: wishlist
> System: Ubuntu 20.04
> Upstream Author: "emanresu" <2board.ad...@protonmail.com>
> Main Repo URL: https://codeberg.org/emanresu/Luksman
> 1.0.0 Release URL:
> https
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves
* Package name: request-tracker5
Version : 5.0.0
Upstream Author : Best Practical Solutions, LLC >
* URL : https://bestpractical.com/rt/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : ex
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #979275
Owner: Leandro Ramos
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Hi. I want to package the program because I have been using it since 2014. I
intend to finish the packaging and look for a sponsor.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joao Paulo Lima de Oliveira
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, jlima.oliveir...@gmail.com
* Package name: golang-github-muesli-reflow
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Christian Muehlhaeuser
* URL : https://github.co
On 25.01.2021 07:25, Holger Wansing wrote:
Such link is already there:
"More: Further links to downloads and software"
That gives you a list, and the first entry points to -
ta-da - distrib/
With my fullscreen browser, it is well below the fold and I did not even
realize it was there. I usu
Package: wnpp
Owner: Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-mockito
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Szczepan Faber, Serhiy Oplakanets, Herr Kaste, Justin Hopper
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/kaste/mockito-python
* License : Expat
Descr
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xrprof
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Aaron Jacobs
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/atheriel/xrprof
* License : GPL-2
Description : External sampling profiler for R
This (still fair
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, at 16:34, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 25 ian 21, 19:35:25, Thomas Lange wrote:
> > Another very odd thing I found.
> >
> > On https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/
> > there's no hint about images including non-free firmware. No hint
> > about firmware at all. And then this FAQ
>
On Lu, 25 ian 21, 19:35:25, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Another very odd thing I found.
>
> On https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/
> there's no hint about images including non-free firmware. No hint
> about firmware at all. And then this FAQ
>
>
> Where is the CD image with non-free?
> .
> Sometimes,
Another very odd thing I found.
On https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/
there's no hint about images including non-free firmware. No hint
about firmware at all. And then this FAQ
Where is the CD image with non-free?
.
Sometimes, someone is kind enough to create unofficial non-free CDs. If you
c
Another very odd thing I found.
On https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/
there's no hint about images including non-free firmware. No hint
about firmware at all. And then this FAQ
Where is the CD image with non-free?
.
Sometimes, someone is kind enough to create unofficial non-free CDs. If you
c
Hello,
The TC have been tasked with deciding the resolution for #922744 and we
would like to hear from anyone whose workflows are benefitted by having
compressed debug symbols turned on by default in debhelper.
We found a case where someone reported this was useful to them ~nine
years ago, but ar
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: basix
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : FEniCS Project
* URL : https://github.com/FEniCS/basix
* License : MIT
Pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joao Paulo Lima de Oliveira
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, jlima.oliveir...@gmail.com
* Package name: golang-github-yuin-goldmark-emoji
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Yusuke Inuzuka
* URL : https://github.com/y
On 25/01/2021 07:22, Tobias Frost wrote:
Am Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 07:28:07PM +0100 schrieb Philipp Kern:
On 24.01.21 17:08, John Scott wrote:
Changing the firmware on an EEPROM is far less practical for the user or
manufacturer (they're on similar footing), and if it's not electronically
erasa
Am Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 07:28:07PM +0100 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On 24.01.21 17:08, John Scott wrote:
> > Changing the firmware on an EEPROM is far less practical for the user or
> > manufacturer (they're on similar footing), and if it's not electronically
> > erasable, it's merely an object that
16 matches
Mail list logo
