Debian Developers,
Comparing important/required/standard packages between
Buster and Bullseye, I noticed some inconsistencies.
Below are six Bullseye packages that I think should
have Priority: optional, with justifications.
1) Are the justifications valid?
2) If so, should I file one or multip
Le sam. 3 juil. 2021 à 12:11, Simon McVittie a écrit :
>
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2021 at 20:04:45 +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> > On a related topic, I'm currently developing support for Debian
> > repositories in Gitlab (and transitively Salsa).
>
> That's great news - being able to build packages in C
On Mon, 05 Jul 2021 at 02:30:00 -0500, Daniel Lewart wrote:
> Comparing important/required/standard packages between
> Buster and Bullseye, I noticed some inconsistencies.
We have been in hard freeze for almost 4 months[1], so I don't think
now is necessarily the right time to be changing what is
Hi Mathieu,
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 10:37:31AM +0200, Mathieu Parent (Debian) wrote:
> [2]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/packages/debian_repository/
thanks, this looks nice and simple!
Do you have plans to support publishing builds only if they've produced
bit by bit identical results on seve
On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 02:09 +, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 11:20 AM Mo Zhou wrote:
> (2) use the "hardware capabilities" feature of ld.so(8)
...
> Solution (2) will result in very bulky binary packages;
Solution (2) seems like the only option that can be done entirely
within Debian
Hi Hunter
On 2021/07/05 05:50, Hunter Wittenborn wrote:
> In combination with some thoughts that have been said here, as well as
> from a branding perspective of what is currently the DUR, I think I'm
> going to change the naming for the project.
>
> I'll be changing it to be called the "makedeb
Le lun. 5 juil. 2021 à 11:46, Holger Levsen a écrit :
>
> Hi Mathieu,
Hi Holger,
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 10:37:31AM +0200, Mathieu Parent (Debian) wrote:
> > [2]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/packages/debian_repository/
>
> thanks, this looks nice and simple!
Thanks.
> Do you have plans t
On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 11:02 +, M. Zhou wrote:
> Supporting multiple ISA variants based on ld.so means a
> multiple of the current package size.
Apart from the -cc2-dbgsym package those seem fine to multiply,
especially since the intended users probably have lots of disk space.
There is also t
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 02:09:36PM +0200, Mathieu Parent (Debian) wrote:
> > Do you have plans to support publishing builds only if they've produced
> > bit by bit identical results on several builders? IOW, do you plan to
> > support reproducible builds? :)
>
> There is no specific support for re
Simon, et al,
Thank you for your excellent feedback!
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 10:40:28 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jul 2021 at 02:30:00 -0500, Daniel Lewart wrote:
> > Comparing important/required/standard packages between
> > Buster and Bullseye, I noticed some inconsistencies.
> W
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Henry-Nicolas Tourneur
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: librem5-flash-image
Version : 0.0+git20210705
Upstream Author : Guido Günther
* URL : https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/librem5-flash-image
* Licens
https://yro.slashdot.org/story/21/07/05/2155212/open-source-audio-editor-audacity-has-become-spyware
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: xir
Version : 1.3.2
Upstream Author : Jian Weng
* URL : https://github.com/Xilinx/Vitis-AI.git
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: C++
13 matches
Mail list logo
