On Fr 04 Mär 2022 01:39:31 CET, Mirco Bauer wrote:
I am not sure if you can build dotnet from source at this point, maybe it
is possible by now. I could never find time to follow-up on this as I
started to work for demanding startups that leave little to no spare time.
If you are interested to
Hi Jo,
On Fr 04 Mär 2022 02:16:05 CET, Jo Shields wrote:
I know that team has been engaging with someone at Canonical about
Ubuntu packaging, I can reach out to find out who that is, and see
whether that work could be uploaded to Debian first as a matter of
course
yes, please do. It wou
“source-build” is the project within Microsoft which aims to produce “upstream
tarballs” in a sufficiently from-source form to satisfy FOSS distributions.
Fedora has had dotnet for a while as a result, a collaboration between the
source-build team in Utah and a distributed set of folks at Red Ha
Hello Stephen, Hello Jo!
thanks for sharing your thoughts on the tricky dotnet package ecosystem
which I can fully relate to. In the Debian Mono Group we discussed these
many times on the available options how we can overcome these new packaging
challenges.
The problem indeed starts with a shift
Hello Mike,
thanks for your interest in getting pinta updated in Debian. The other day
I noticed as well that pinta is outdated in Debian and it does not look
like there is a simple way forward, unfortunately.
Pinta has moved to the dotnet runtime which is not packaged in Debian.
Many years ago
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1213 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 192 (new: 2)
Total number of packages reques
Hello,
On Thu 03 Mar 2022 at 08:44PM +01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 09:57:26AM -0700 schrieb Sean Whitton:
>> > PS: I'm currently considering writing up some summary of the bunch
>> > of threads that was born out of my initial mail.
>> >
>> > [1] https://lists.debian.org/
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:47 PM Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> Timotheus Pokorra dijo [Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:35:36PM +0100]:
> > Hello Mike,
> >
> > I have some experience with Mono packaging in Fedora.
> > I know of the dotnet SIG in Fedora. They made a massive effort, involving
> > Microsoft employees
Timotheus Pokorra dijo [Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:35:36PM +0100]:
> Hello Mike,
>
> I have some experience with Mono packaging in Fedora.
> I know of the dotnet SIG in Fedora. They made a massive effort, involving
> Microsoft employees, to get dotnet core built according to the Fedora rules
> (build
Am Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 09:57:26AM -0700 schrieb Sean Whitton:
> > PS: I'm currently considering writing up some summary of the bunch
> > of threads that was born out of my initial mail.
> >
> > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/01/msg00226.html
>
> Assuming I'm not misreading, th
Hello,
On Thu 03 Mar 2022 at 07:36am +01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Am Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:33:35AM -0700 schrieb Sean Whitton:
>>
>> I'm sorry to be responding only a month later, but I think there are
>> some reasons why binNEW is not the worst place to be doing these extra
>> chec
Hi Nick,
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 6:23 PM Nick Black wrote:
>
> My Salsa CI pipeline is blowing up in the lintian step, with
> lots of warnings of the form:
Following an upgrade of the Salsa runners to bullseye [1] the bug you
reported here originally was closed. [2]
Thank you for using Lintian!
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Doug Torrance
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, dtorra...@debian.org
* Package name: node-remark-slide
Version : 0.15.0
Upstream Author : Ole Petter Bang
* URL : https://github.com/gnab/remark
* License : MIT
P
13 matches
Mail list logo
