Bug#903158: Info received (Bug#903158: Multi-Arch: foreign and -dbgsym: too weak dependency)

2022-10-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will rep

Re: Bug#903158: Multi-Arch: foreign and -dbgsym: too weak dependency

2022-10-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2022-10-09 at 18:54 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: > I suppose we could use 'foo-dbgsym Enhances foo:arch (= version)'. That sounds interesting and would be nice generally, however... > On a sidenote: What the Depends ensures which the Enhances doesn't is > that they are upgraded in lo

Re: Bug#903158: Multi-Arch: foreign and -dbgsym: too weak dependency

2022-10-09 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 03:42:59PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I was under the impression that the Debian archive does not allow > dependencies with an explicit architecture like this, only the :any > qualifier for M-A: allowed packages (like python3:any). "allow" is a strong word especially if

Re: Q: uscan with GitHub

2022-10-09 Thread Volans
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 at 18:12:15 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > julien.pu...@gmail.com, le lun. 19 sept. 2022 18:00:37 +0200, a ecrit: > > > Le lundi 19 septembre 2022 à 20:50 +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit : > > > > Recent changes in GitHub releases pages, I cannot check upstream > > > > vers

Re: Bug#903158: Multi-Arch: foreign and -dbgsym: too weak dependency

2022-10-09 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 10:26:39AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I have often wanted a different kind of relationship between packages > and their dbgsym packages than mere Depends. Currently when a dbgsym is > installed it keeps the library package installed even after it is no > longer used and both

Bug#1021495: ITP: lomiri-gallery-app -- Gallery App for Lomiri Operating Environment

2022-10-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Gabriel X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: lomiri-gallery-app Version : 2.10.9 Upstream Author : UBports Developers * URL : https://gitlab.com/ubports/development/apps/lomiri-gallery-app * License

Bug#1021493: ITP: overte -- 3D social virtual worlds software

2022-10-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: overte Version : 2022.09.1 Upstream Author : Overte e.V. * URL : https://overte.org/ * License

Re: Welcome to your new installation of Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid

2022-10-09 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 12:55, Sven Mueller wrote: > > > Am 09.10.2022 12:20 schrieb Luca Boccassi : > > On Sun, 9 Oct 2022, 10:23 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, > wrote: > > > I do not understand enough about systemd to be able to say whether an empty > value or "uninitialized" is the correct

Re: Welcome to your new installation of Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid

2022-10-09 Thread Sven Mueller
Am 09.10.2022 12:20 schrieb Luca Boccassi :On Sun, 9 Oct 2022, 10:23 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, wrote: I do not understand enough about systemd to be able to say whether an empty value or "uninitialized" is the correct default value for tools like debootstrap or mmdebstrap

Re: Welcome to your new installation of Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid

2022-10-09 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022, 11:19 Samuel Henrique, wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 08:41, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > wrote: > > the last upload of src:systemd (251.5-1) enabled firstboot by default on > > Debian. From debian/changelog: > > > > * Enable firstboot, disabled by default on

Re: Welcome to your new installation of Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid

2022-10-09 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022, 10:23 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, < jo...@debian.org> wrote: > Quoting Bastian Blank (2022-10-09 10:24:26) > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 09:41:29AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin > Rodrigues wrote: > > > This breaks a number of setups like: > > > > > > - the sbuild autopkgt

Re: Welcome to your new installation of Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid

2022-10-09 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hi, On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 08:41, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > the last upload of src:systemd (251.5-1) enabled firstboot by default on > Debian. From debian/changelog: > > * Enable firstboot, disabled by default on Debian. I'm confused by the above, one part says "enabled firstboo

Re: Welcome to your new installation of Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid

2022-10-09 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Quoting Bastian Blank (2022-10-09 10:24:26) > On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 09:41:29AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > wrote: > > This breaks a number of setups like: > > > > - the sbuild autopkgtest > >https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sbuild/-/jobs/3353627/raw > > - the dropbear autopkg

Re: Welcome to your new installation of Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid

2022-10-09 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 09:41:29AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > This breaks a number of setups like: > > - the sbuild autopkgtest >https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sbuild/-/jobs/3353627/raw > - the dropbear autopkgtest > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstab

Welcome to your new installation of Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid

2022-10-09 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, the last upload of src:systemd (251.5-1) enabled firstboot by default on Debian. From debian/changelog: * Enable firstboot, disabled by default on Debian. Currently the first-boot conditions are not met by any Debian image (/etc/machine-id with content uninitialized, so we can j