usertagging file conflicts [Was: Re: /usr-merge: continuous archive analysis]

2023-07-16 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi, On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 03:34:38PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > ## Usertagging bugs > > In order to avoid filing duplicates, I need a usertagging scheme for > bugs. Are there opinions on what user I should use for this? In the > simplest instance, I can use my DD login. Roughly speaking ever

Bug#1041288: ITP: cocotb -- coroutine based cosimulation library for writing VHDL and Verilog testbenches in Python

2023-07-16 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) * Package name: cocotb Version : 1.8.0 Upstream Author : Chris Higgs, Stuart Hodgson * URL : https://github.com/cocotb/cocotb * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description

Bug#1041285: ITP: pyuvm -- python implementation of UVM

2023-07-16 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) * Package name: pyuvm Version : 2.9.1 Upstream Author : Ray Salemi * URL : https://github.com/pyuvm/pyuvm/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : python im

Re: proposal: dhcpcd-base as standard DHCP client starting with Trixie

2023-07-16 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 02:04:57PM -0400, nick black wrote: > Sam Hartman left as an exercise for the reader: > > I consider anything that requires me to write wpa_supplicant config to > > be a bad idea (unless I'm running an AP) and NetworkManager driving > > wpa_supplicant is a better idea. > >

Bug#1041273: ITP: rust-rustls-webpki -- web PKI X.509 certificate verification

2023-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: rust-rustls-webpki Version : 0.101.1 Upstream Contact: https://github.com/rustls/webpki/issues * URL :

Re: Proposed MBF: Removal of libfreetype6-dev

2023-07-16 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2023-07-16 22:38 +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > I will be removing the transitional package libfreetype6-dev (from the > source package freetype) later this year. > > Currently, there are 219 build-dependencies and 29 (direct) > dependencies on libfreetype6-dev, which has been released with > bu

Re: Proposed MBF: Removal of libfreetype6-dev

2023-07-16 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 22:38:20 +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > Currently, there are 219 build-dependencies and 29 (direct) > dependencies on libfreetype6-dev, which has been released with > bullseye and bookworm. Lintian diagnoses this as "[build-]depends-on-obsolete-package" since 2.116.0 (MR at [

Proposed MBF: Removal of libfreetype6-dev

2023-07-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi, I will be removing the transitional package libfreetype6-dev (from the source package freetype) later this year. Currently, there are 219 build-dependencies and 29 (direct) dependencies on libfreetype6-dev, which has been released with bullseye and bookworm. I plan to file bugs with severity

Re: virtual packages for Ada libraries

2023-07-16 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 7:50 AM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I now recall: The Rust library packages wreaking havoc by prematurely > entering testing is (at least partly) due to the Rust team choosing to > flag all(!) autopkgtests as flaky, so not really a concern for other > teams (read: just don't

Re: virtual packages for Ada libraries

2023-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2023-07-15 10:05:24) > Quoting Nicolas Boulenguez (2023-07-12 15:55:09) > > The Ada maintainers are considering a new naming scheme for -dev packages, > > where > > libada-foo-dev Provides: libada-foo-dev-HASH. > > source packages Build-Depend: libada-foo-dev > > bin

Re: versioned dependencies between -dev packages

2023-07-16 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le sam. 15 juil. 2023, 17:36, Nicolas Boulenguez a écrit : > Julien Puydt > > - Indeed this is quite fragile; I have two scripts for Coq packages [1]: > > one to tell me about the deps (I give it which package I have to upgrade > > and it gives the list of affected packages by pass) and the

Re: pre-MBF: fail to build (repack) source

2023-07-16 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 00:03:00 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > due to Build-Depends > being inadequate (per the Policy, B-D-Indep are _not_ necessarily > installed) For completeness, B-D-Arch are not guaranteed to be installed during clean either. Similarly, Build-Conflicts are guaranteed to be abs