Re: The future of mipsel port

2023-08-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 13:54 +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > I am late to the party but as i mentioned a couple times on debian-mips > already i'd like to keep mipsel as a debian-port - and i'd like to > revert away from mips32r2 back to mips2/mips3 - That change (with > stretch) basically dropped a

Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie

2023-08-06 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Following the procedure to modify default dpkg-buildflags I propose to enable -fstack-clash-protection on amd64. The bug for dpkg tracking this is #918914. | -fstack-clash-protection | Generate code to prevent stack clash style attacks. When this option | is enabled, the compiler will only allocat

Re: /usr-merge: continuous archive analysis

2023-08-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2023-08-01 Helmut Grohne wrote: [...] > In moving crontab_setgid from lib to libexec, you effectively evade the > moratorium and are entitled to also move from / to /usr. This is an > action you can do right now. The move from /lib to /usr/libexec prevents > the file loss scenario that spurred

Re: The future of mipsel port

2023-08-06 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi, On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 12:45:51PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: > Hi, folks, > > Welcome to era of Trixie, and let's talk about the future of mipsel. > So I consider to suggest drop mipsel support from the list of official ports. > (And let's keep mips64el port). I am late to the party but as

Re: Potential MBF: packages failing to build twice in a row

2023-08-06 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Quoting Timo Röhling (2023-08-05 21:07:34) > * Lucas Nussbaum [2023-08-05 17:06]: > >An example sbuild invocation to reproduce failures is: > [omitted the command line equivalent of Tolstoy's War and Peace] > > If we decide that this issue is important enough that people should > care and mass bu

Re: Potential MBF: packages failing to build twice in a row

2023-08-06 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 05 Aug 2023 at 21:29:08 +0200, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > I expect all Python packages that ship > $name.egg-info and don't remove it in clean and don't exclude it via > extend-diff-ignore (all of which is unneeded busywork even if recommended) > to behave the same. Python packages that

Bug#1043110: ITP: ocaml-randomconv -- convert from random byte vectors to random native numbers

2023-08-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stéphane Glondu X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org * Package name: ocaml-randomconv Version : 0.1.3 Upstream Contact: Hannes Mehnert * URL : https://github.com/hannesm/randomconv * L

Q: How to set DMARC record for .debian.net?

2023-08-06 Thread Kentaro Hayashi
Hi, According to LDAP Gateway [1], It supports to create a SPF txt record and DKIM pub key txt record for dnsZoneEntry. I'm no sure but, it seems that DMARC txt record (v=DMARC1; ...) may be rejected to set. Are there any guide to set DMARC for .debian.net correctly (If I'm wrong) or Can we sup