Bug#1053185: ITP: python-varlink -- Python implementation of the Varlink protocol

2023-09-28 Thread Luca Boccassi
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Luca Boccassi X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : python-varlink Version : 31.0.0 Upstream Author : various * URL : https://github.com/varlink/python * License : Ap

Re: Bug#1053165: ITS: nunit

2023-09-28 Thread Tobias Frost
Hi Bastian, I'd just want to chime in and confirm what David wrote aleady. When we wrote the ITS procedure during Debconf Tawain, it was an explicitly designed that way, that it must not be a way to fast-orphan packages, bypassing the processes we have for that. This was intentional engineered tha

Re: Bug#1053165: ITS: nunit

2023-09-28 Thread Gioele Barabucci
On 28/09/23 17:22, Bastian Germann wrote: Okay. What do you suggest for "team maintained" packages where there is no active team member? File MIA processes for each of the uploaders? And then? The MIA team's bugs are not RC bugs, An automatic time-based "orphaning + RC" process like the one de

Re: Bug#1053165: ITS: nunit

2023-09-28 Thread Andreas Ronnquist
On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 17:22:20 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: >Okay. What do you suggest for "team maintained" packages where there is no >active team member? >File MIA processes for each of the uploaders? And then? The MIA team's bugs >are not RC bugs, >so you cannot even NMU them based on the MIA

Re: Bug#1053165: ITS: nunit

2023-09-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Sep 28, Bastian Germann wrote: > Okay. What do you suggest for "team maintained" packages where there is no > active team member? > File MIA processes for each of the uploaders? And then? The MIA team's bugs > are not RC bugs, > so you cannot even NMU them based on the MIA bug. After having

Re: Bug#1053165: ITS: nunit

2023-09-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
On September 28, 2023 3:22:20 PM UTC, Bastian Germann wrote: >Okay. What do you suggest for "team maintained" packages where there is no >active team member? >File MIA processes for each of the uploaders? And then? The MIA team's bugs >are not RC bugs, >so you cannot even NMU them based on th

Re: Bug#1053165: ITS: nunit

2023-09-28 Thread Bastian Germann
Okay. What do you suggest for "team maintained" packages where there is no active team member? File MIA processes for each of the uploaders? And then? The MIA team's bugs are not RC bugs, so you cannot even NMU them based on the MIA bug. I think, just letting such packages rot for one or two de

Re: Bug#1053165: ITS: nunit

2023-09-28 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting David Bremner (2023-09-28 16:40:13) > Bastian Germann writes: > > Source: nunit > > > > I intend to salvage nunit with the plan to orphan it in three weeks. > > Please notify me if you object. > > In my opinion, your repeated "salvaging" of packages in order to orphan > them is an ab

Re: Bug#1053165: ITS: nunit

2023-09-28 Thread David Bremner
Bastian Germann writes: > Source: nunit > > I intend to salvage nunit with the plan to orphan it in three weeks. > Please notify me if you object. In my opinion, your repeated "salvaging" of packages in order to orphan them is an abuse of the ITS process. Yes, it's a clever procedural hack, but