On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:07:17PM -0500, Steven Robbins wrote:
> Peter convincingly argues (details in bug) that manual intervention is needed
> for package "cargo":
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 00:48:32 + Peter Michael Green
> wrote:
> > This will require manual intervention to resolve, either
Peter convincingly argues (details in bug) that manual intervention is needed
for package "cargo":
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 00:48:32 + Peter Michael Green
wrote:
> This will require manual intervention to resolve, either through
> cross-building or through building manually in a hacked-up build
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nick Hastings
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nicholaschasti...@gmail.com
* Package name: swappy
Version : 1.5.1
Upstream Contact: Jeremy Attali
* URL : https://github.com/jtheoof/swappy
* License : MIT
Pr
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I hope there is some better solution than sending single bug reports
> for those packages. If ftpmaster tooling really needs single bug
> reports I wonder how I can automatically create such bug reports with
> always the same text, j
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 06:25:50PM + schrieb Thorsten Alteholz:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > please file one RM bug for each package that needs to be partially removed.
> > This needs to be done even for depen
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:26:40PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> do mutt -s "RM: remove $package" -i tmpfile $package
the 2nd $package in that line must be sub...@bugs.debian.org
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Ope
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I hope there is some better solution than sending single bug reports
> for those packages. If ftpmaster tooling really needs single bug
> reports I wonder how I can automatically create such bug reports with
> always the same text, j
Hi,
Am Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 06:25:50PM + schrieb Thorsten Alteholz:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> please file one RM bug for each package that needs to be partially removed.
> This needs to be done even for dependencies of dependencies.
> Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:28:06PM +0530, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote:
> cat > work-request-ruby-semver-dialects.debusine << END
> build_components:
> - any
> - all
> host_architecture: amd64
> input:
> source_artifact_id: 788
> environment_id: 154
> END
>
> debusine create-work-request sbuild
On 7/3/24 10:36 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
While for the moment Debusine may seem like a less polished version of
Salsa CI, it has very different goals, and we are working towards those.
In the next milestone
(https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/debusine/-/milestones/9), which
is well underway, w
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 07:47:23PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is certainly not kind of the mail I was hoping for as a new libfuse
> maintainer.
>
> As you can see from the title and from discussion below (sorry this is
> not typical ML discussion style), we have a bit of of
Am Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:12:45PM + schrieb Colin Watson:
> "rmadison clustalw" shows:
Shame on me I always forget about rmadison which explains things
perfectly.
> So since clustalw/2.1+lgpl-7/i386 is still in oldstable and stable, it
> has to be kept in the pool; files are only expired fr
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 01:06:49PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Yes, I've filed this and this was perfectly intended (even if I forgot
> that the bug is done meanwhile which I should have checked before asking
> here - sorry about this). It was just that all signs that this package
> exists are r
Am Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:41:42AM + schrieb Colin Watson:
> Search for "clustalw" in https://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt:
>
> [Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:19:39 -] [ftpmaster: Thorsten Alteholz]
> Removed the following packages from unstable:
>
> clustalw | 2.1+lgpl-7 | ar
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Debci seems to be fine in testing clustalw on all architectures[3] and
> according to build logs[4] all should be fine. Unfortunately
>
>wget -q -O -
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.xz | xzgr
Hi,
I'm working on some time_t side effects on the emboss package and by
doing so stumbled I upon the fact that i386 builds of packages with a
Build-Dependency on clustalw are failing. You can see an example in
Salsa CI for libbio-tools-run-alignment-clustalw-perl[1] which contains
The follow
Hi again,
please forgot my reference to "rott" (which should have rather been "ratt")
... I'm just reading those other mails of fellow contributors having the
same question.
Sorry for the noise
Andreas.
Am Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:53:10AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi Colin,
>
> Am Fri, M
Hi Colin,
Am Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 11:41:27AM + schrieb Colin Watson:
> > Speaking about Salsa CI: I would like to do what Enrico mentioned to
> > somehow re-run building some Salsa commit using sbuild and (optionally)
> > the autopkgtest on the result.
>
> We don't have direct support for bu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jérémy Lal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Javascript Maintainers
* Package name: node-import-meta-resolve
Version : 4.0.0-1
Upstream Contact: Titus Wormer
* URL : https://github.com/wooorm/import-meta-reso
19 matches
Mail list logo
