Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alex Myczko
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: kilo
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Authors: Salvatore Sanfilippo
URL : https://github.com/antirez/kilo
* License : BSD-2
Description : Small text
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alex Myczko
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: edlin
Version : 2.17
Upstream Authors: Gregory Pietsch
URL : https://github.com/FDOS/edlin
* License : GPL-2+
Description : Standard line ed
Hi,
On 6/11/24 00:26, Simon McVittie wrote:
Reproducibility outside of sterile environments is however a problem for us
as a distribution, because it affects how well people are able to contribute
to packages they are not directly maintaining
If our package-building entry point sets up aspec
Hi!
On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 18:01:58 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Ideally, we'd not just do a rebuild with the flags, but also do a
> rebuild without and then compare the binary .debs. In the event that we
> misguide configure, we expect the .debs to differ and otherwise to equal
> due to the work
Hi Laszlo and Yogeswaran,
I'm explicitly adding Laszlo to Cc to increase the chances of him
chiming in.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 06:40:02PM -0400, Yogeswaran Umasankar wrote:
> There is a file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb. The
> conflict arises due to both packages has a file at
Hi,
On 6/11/24 07:40, Yogeswaran Umasankar wrote:
It appears that nanopb's use of the module name "proto" does not align
with the conventional identification of a Python module. Given this, it
might be plausible to make this module private within the nanopb
package. This adjustment could potent
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: python-django-structlog
Version : 8.1.0
Upstream Contact: Michael Fladischer
* URL : https://github.
Hi,
On 09-06-2024 1:56 p.m., rhys wrote:
So given that these no longer fit the "old and busted" description, is Debian
going to stick with the decision to not support them? Or is Debian going to continue to
support this processor, since it is still apparently a viable product, enough that new
8 matches
Mail list logo