CHECK BEFORE YOU RETITLE Re: Processed: Retitling...

Hey, buddy!! I ITA those packages a while back - I'll be uploading them in the next day!!! PLEASE CHECK THE O LIST __BEFORE__ YOU RETITLE A BUG! - Adam On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:03:14PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > retitle 123477

Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:22:09AM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 02:23, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > smooth introduction? you never heard of policy, maint-guide, developers' > > reference, web pages, etc, have you? > > Many operating systems have accompanying "certific

Re: find eating all memory

On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 06:45:53PM -0600, Bryan Andersen wrote: > Andreas Rottmann wrote: > > > > Michael De Nil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > on a simple 'find /var -name sendmail* -print' command, the find-process > > > eats all my memory (128 Meg RAM) > > > when there is

Question about cdrecord and -audio

cdrecord or my drive? Thanks for any help in advance, Adam Majer pgpbU7PIFqIVI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package

On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 01:44:38PM +0200, Juha J?ykk? wrote: > > This doesn't sound too bad to me, _but_ a better report might be to > > set up some sort of automatic system that sends out email to all > > maintainers at 1 month intervals [or something like that]. If > > someone doesn't respond to

Re: Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package

On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:31:37AM +0100, Lenart Janos wrote: > [Please Cc: to me! (ETOOHIGHVOLUME)] > > As you might already have noticed Debian begun to bloat - so many > unneeded, unused, unmaintained(!) packages. > My opinion is that one DD alone couldn't upload NEW package, but he > needs 2 p

Re: from potato to woody without a free internet connection

On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:58:34PM +0100, Tom Jongsma wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running debian potato right now. I want to upgrade it to Debian Woody, > but I don't have a free internet connection. > Can I update my potato by burning a cd on school. And Install it on my > machine at home? > I can

Re: package lists for older machines

On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:57:54PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 21:15:58 +0100, Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >A P166 should be a great mp3 player, but gnome probably is overkill... > >So you'll need another Packages.gz for mp3-players, another for servers > >(whic

Re: Sparc buildd a cross-compiler?

On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:07:41PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:54:10PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > > G++ 2.95 is pretty broken in its own right. Just because it won't compile > > something doesn't necessarily mean that the source is at fault. I wouldn't > > regard

Re: Sparc buildd a cross-compiler?

On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:17:51PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 05:19:27PM +0100, Mikael Hedin wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I noticed gsmlib has failed on sparc for a long time. The last log, > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gsmlib&ver=1.7-1&arch=sparc&stamp=10060

Re: thomas's trivia crusade

On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 10:16:15PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 11:17:34AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Sat, 22 Dec 2001 03:50:08 +0100: > > > they are actually *REAL* bugs that affect the operation of the > > > package, not trivial items li

<    1   2