une/147869.html
--
Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F|
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ssl 3.0.0-1 [1].
This would mean that just uploading to experimental and let ci.debian.net
do all builds of reverse dependencies would be sufficient, but I'm not
sure whether the FTBFS reports are made automatically.
[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/streamlink/unstable/amd64/
Hi,
Is there a way to receive a mail when a new upstream version is released ?
I've subscribed to my package on https://tracker.debian.org but I don't
receive mails for new upstream releases.
Maybe there is other ways ?
--
Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904
hrome via boards
>
> proliant hp and DELL ones!
These drivers were reintroduced last friday.
--
Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F|
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hink the main page could have also have a "Other downloads"
link to one of the more complete download pages (like /distrib), so
users not familiar with the wiki can find it one click away.
Maybe I can propose a patch for at least this small link to /distrib
--
Alexis Murzeau
P
/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607193
Re-organise the CD / download pages to make them more useful:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819664
- --
Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
ther" link under the big Download link pointing to other
places ?
For example see attachment with "Other architectures and options" linking to:
https://www.debian.org/distrib/
And maybe add a link from https://www.debian.org/distrib/ to
images with non-free firmwares
--
Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F|
Hi,
Le 10/01/2021 à 22:45, Enrico Zini a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I've enabled Salsa OIDC logins for debtags.debian.org.
Thanks, I could login with Salsa and set debtags for my package :)
--
Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F|
se some others.
> Sorry - really slow going :(
Hi Mark, I hope a monthly ping is ok for you. Did you have a chance to talk to
EU geos people?
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl/HQ7AACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFvvFAgA0TUoJRfJ7v+K
available anymore (because we're after the closing date, I assume), do we have
a winner yet?
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl+sNpUACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFsQ/ggAtDFOw/p4rBtsRhPaonbLgyWbFH1mYM+9
se some others.
> Sorry - really slow going :(
Thanks! I'm personnaly more interested in EU/FR geo, but thanks anyway :)
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl+i+JQACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFtGYAf/ZN2b6nZcM+Sb11Vm0VbdPtmbK9hdW2wBI7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 11:12 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> did you have an update from your colleague on the other geos?
Hi Mark, I might have missed it, but did your daily poking of your collegues
gave results on the others geos? Tha
itl.org
Subject: APT-REPOSITORY DEFECT REQUEST for ${XXX}
Please include your return e-mail and some way that easily shows you are
associated with the package. We will then respond with reproduction
information, tools and data that might be needed to identify the defects.
-- end quote ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 15:30 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On 9/2/2020 2:19 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > We're still working on getting other geographies up and running - not
> > > available yet I'm afraid.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 15:30 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 9/2/2020 2:19 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > US: http://www.lenovo.com/us/en/Linux
> > > Canada: http://www.lenovo.com/ca/en/linuxca
> >
>
change it. For the HAP the snippet is not there at all (although I think I
remember seeing it once)
Again thanks for the work enabling the portal.
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl9P4hUACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFvHLAf/dDnQwGKqdgV+7Pv
have enough time nowadays, you can take over the package
if you want"
just to show you are present and reading mails (even if not
processing the underlying work they ask for).
--
Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F|
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
If there is still something somewhere, I would be happy to read it :)
--
Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: pkg-gtkpod-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
* Package name: idevicerestore
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : libimobiledevice project
* URL : http://www.libimobiledevice.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Descripti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gtkpod Maintainers
* Package name: libirecovery
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : libimobiledevice project
* URL : http://www.libimobiledevice.org/
* License : GPL/LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Library al
f, the same way if he would have uploaded it to a
social media are whatever.
That way, the legal responsibility burden is distributed on many peoples
instead of a small number.
If one is not sure that the software is distributable, he can mail the upstream
maintainers for a clue.
--
Alexis Murze
bian.org; 2 Mar 2020 13:56:49 +
---
--
Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
y case. Salsa gitlab's CI can be an alternative but for me debci is
sufficient. and I run sbuild before pushing/releasing a version.
--
Alexis Murzeau
Le 01/09/2019 à 19:15, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
>
>
> On 9/1/19 6:41 PM, Alexis Murzeau wrote:
>> I find both arguments quite valid:
>> - The BTS is more future proof, stuff on it will probably last longer
>> than whatever is on Salsa currently.
>
> Why? There i
yself ok with the BTS but I have to send sometimes more than one
mail to control@b.d.o before having the right action on the bug done
(mistyped command, wrong syntax, bad bug status when merging bugs, ...).
So it is not as easy to use as a graphical interface.
Maybe I should just use command line
e https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-html-proofer
gbp:info: Cloning from
'https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-html-proofer'
$ cd ruby-html-proofer/
$ gbp buildpackage "--git-builder=sbuild -v -As -d unstable" \
> --git-export-dir=../build-area
gbp:error: upstream/3.11.1 is not a valid treeish
```
I guess I'm missing either a part of git history or just the orig
tarball, but what's the normal way to get it ?
(maybe there is a doc or wiki somewhere about this ?)
--
Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tely out of my league (and I already
tried multiple time on other issues).
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAlz1fv0ACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFuTTQf+ITXxUm6DnBRNuGwsKbKCFoeXUAiP+v5GdIJDDifEWG91inoF1tf6GswS
l1RRJHYczv9WtjL+6e1522vzAp0h6j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 21:55 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> I noted Andreas raised the severity, but I hope someone has an idea how to fix
> that because I don't.
Also, since it was posted on -devel, I guess there's a bit of e
And people are still reporting new ones (or posting to -devel) so clearly they
are hard to spot.
Maybe locking through vt-switch is a bad idea,
I noted Andreas raised the severity, but I hope someone has an idea how to fix
that because I don't.
R
eel free to reply (please keep me on CC,
I'm not subscribed to -devel@).
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAlw8UR8ACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFtMuggA2H/+/cLT71cLzQVrkBy/yRsdpZ/2TRPn9akTP2BUUjlB3Ze/B5kBXFFT
LnpfDa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yves-Alexis Perez
* Package name: hardening-runtime
Version : 1
Upstream Author : Yves-Alexis Perez https://salsa.debian.org/corsac/hardening-runtime
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: configuration file
Description
the rooftops just in case it could
> still happen, but mostly because it could prevent other firms from
> suggesting partnerships with Debian in future.
No need, thanks. It was merely just to know if the reason was technical or
not, and if it was something we could do something about.
Reg
cussion.
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAlsQWycACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFsfuAf/T7YfRypgSOO7W2+PJQSZodO4bcECAJztsy7wvdv1KMgdkqDrxIIQ30cL
zXhBdSTFWVmRd6L/MjVN9sEq2eFD3W1V3mER05pYWo4BTEl8sXSqm54tkCbNxGQS
51hXERwrX+fxNj9H/
es in
.pbuilderrc), but the build does produce and _amd64.changes too (which I don't
touch).
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 20:49 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 19:06 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > [ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
> >
ster issue IMHO, definitely not due to
> debhelper much less by pbuilder…
I fine with that answer. My point was just that, should ftpmasters say that it
was unsupported to have an _.buildinfo file inside a _source.changes,
then something was wrong in the build toolchain.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
Sorry for the fail on FTP-masters email address (which also got the mail
bounced from alioth). Replying to keep threading consistent but quoting the
whole mail below).
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 14:49 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently had a problem with an upload to th
archive failed later)?
I yet didn't file any bug (to pbuidler, debhelper or dpkg-dev) because I'm
really unsure where the problem(s) lies.
Any help appreciated here. Please keep on CC, I'm not subscribed to debian-
devel anymore.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description:
ways appreciated when you add a bit of context when
reassigning bug.
Fredrik, the plugin already recommends pavucontrol (which recommends
pulseaudio) so it should already have been installed unless you manually asked
not. But right, it might be a good idea to have a direct pulseaudio
recommend
Go fuck yourself faggot
On Jan 11, 2017 7:40 AM, "CHOICEHOMEWARRANTY" wrote:
> ksjd __CONGRATUIATlON__cameron12708__ ,
>
> _The_Home_Warranty_Limited_time_event_
> _Never_pay_for_covered_home_repairs_again!_
>
> __Click_Here__
>
> __If_You_Wish _To_UnSubscribe_From_Future_Mailings_Please_Click_H
On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 08:39 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Maybe the XFCE / Cinnamon / Mate maintainers can confirm if that is indeed
> the plan.
Talking for pkg-xfce: I have no idea what this is about.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Tapani Palviainen writes:
i want to get off this list!
Visit the "Subscribe / Unsubscribe" section of
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/.
Alexis.
drop me from those mails, and do whatever you
want, I won't bother at all.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
x27;s
> meant
> to lack such fancy features.
I'm unsure what you mean by that. We don't do specific efforts to tune
Xfce appearance (that's not really our priority indeed), but you might
want to take a look at Xubuntu customization if eye candy is what
interest you.
Regards,
other DEs) have been hurt by the various
enforced transitions (ConsoleKit,
hal/devicekit-power/upower/upower-0.99), yes. Combined with the lack of
resources, that means it lays behind the people who decided those
transitions.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
intainer doesn't seem to be active (no upload since 2012..).
> > Alternatively the package could be maintained by the strongswan team?
>
> The strongswan team appears to have only two active members at the
> moment, Yves-Alexis and I, and I have no interest in maintaining
&g
udes an upstream source tarball plus a grsec patch?
In my case, it's actually the src:linux orig.tar.xz with the (adapted)
grsec patch added to debian/patches (like other featuresets).
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:45:10PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 22:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> [...]
> > NOTE: I don't want to dismiss Mempo attempts, especially the
> > reproducible build part, and I also think it's valuable to provide
wrong or if things have changed since them, and there's
indeed a consensus for the vanilla + grsecurity + make deb-pkg as an
easy way to provide grsec kernels in the Debian archive, then I'm all
for it.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gcc upstream, asking for status and maybe pushing
a little bit forward.
But right now I'm not sure that, in Debian, we have people knowledgeable
enough on the intimate gcc behavior to push that directly. That's a bit
unfortunate.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
Debian security team
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
unsure it's actually related to hidpid=2
and not just to the lack of systemd/logind support in current Xfce
stack.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
Debian security team
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: light-locker
Version : 1.1.0-1
Upstream Author : William Jon McCann, Peter de Ridder, Simon Steinbeiß
* URL : https://github.com/the-cavalry/light-locker/
* License :
fectly elsewhere, but
I'm unsure if it's a good idea to rely on it.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
e
time before the freeze though). Same goes for gtk2-engines-murrine.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
;
>
>
To be honest, I think -devel is a bad place for this just because it's
more or less full of useless, hundred mails long threads, so for example
I barely can follow it (and consider removing my subscription). So it'd
be better on some less noisy, security related, debian list like
debian-secur...@lists.debian.org.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
sts.debian.org/debian-user/2012/02/msg01273.html
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On mar., 2012-05-15 at 14:32 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi dpkg-* maintainers,
I think you missed the correct mailing list to reach the dpkg-*
maintainers.
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
kage
> won't use them.
>
Any reason you didn't CC: wordpress maintainers? (I guess they are
subscribed to -devel but considering the current mail rate, I'm unsure
they'll read everything so it might make sense to CC: them at first…)
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
he maintainers) to a new upstream release than not
having it at all and having to handle it myself (even if in this case I
handled it myself).
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ot and they do have a working console asking for the
passphrase.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
dangerous line. People (sometimes) don't purge packages
for a reason, you might lose data here.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
f my initiative and, afaict, he didn't really
have time for that, nor was interested in the porting part.
And as I said before, I'm not interested in shipping just a patch in
Debian. If users want to patch the kernel, configure it and built it, I
think they're better off getting t
On mer., 2012-02-01 at 14:32 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 10:51 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > > On m
c-create -t debian
> /usr/lib/lxc/templates/lxc-debian
Note that the template “only” drops CAP_MAC_ADMIN, CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE,
CAP_SYS_ADMIN and CAP_SYS_MODULE. Are we really sure this is enough?
http://www.mail-archive.com/lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00977.html
thread gives some pointer, but i
On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> > > What is stopping you from creating another package, that provides the
> >
On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:26:50 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez
> wrote:
> > So I think it's perfectly clear that nor Debian nor Grsecurity are
> > really interested in Debian shipping a Grsecurity kernel.
>
> Well,
On lun., 2012-01-30 at 14:08 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:05 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > (adding few CC:s to keep track on the bug)
> >
> > On dim., 2012-01-29 at 21:26 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 20:57
(adding few CC:s to keep track on the bug)
On dim., 2012-01-29 at 21:26 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 20:57 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On dim., 2012-01-29 at 18:22 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Featuresets
> > > ---
>
doing anything is indeed a way to just get rid of the question, but
I would have at least appreciated a definitive answer on the bug rather
than via the dda mail.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
with crazy versioning solutions.
I'm not sure telling people to use --no-sandbox without telling them
what they lose is a good idea. Sandboxing is here for a reason.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
st that, imho, that's not really needed by default. Now if we
consider people using default install don't know how to install more
stuff, and use that as a basis for selecting what's in the default
install, I think we might have quite some issues.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On mar., 2011-10-18 at 15:55 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Drop usb-modeswitch completely from the default desktop install?
>
> network-manager recommends modemmanager recommends usb-modeswitch.
>
> network-manager wants modemmanager to handle &
On mar., 2011-10-18 at 13:36 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> What's your opinion ?
Drop usb-modeswitch completely from the default desktop install?
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
motivation is to make Debian a better distribution.
I'm not going to change it if you don't have good reason for specific
packages changes.
Regrds,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
on, and I'm not sure there's *one* answer.
In some cases you really want them (well, as long as you want automatic
recommends), but not all.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
nk.
Which as issues especially wrt. ASLR.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ge/release/current-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/
and http://live.debian.net
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1311674304.32565.4.camel@oban
me can easily
> be tweaked post-install.
Not completely relevant, but note that Aurélien Jarno provides Squeeze
images for various architectures under qemu at
http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu/
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
fixed is grub not writing to your “alternative
place”?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
e what Ben asked: why do you need that?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ot of RAM (in which case the kernel
> may not be able to make use of all of it).
And you lose NX too.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
eing tracked when you change provider, like connecting
from some hotspot, the hotel, a conference, work, home etc.).
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On jeu., 2011-03-31 at 14:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Xfce 4.8 (for the most part) doesn't rely on hal anymore, at least on Linux.
> Yves-Alexis, what is the fallback on kfreebsd? Does Xfce 4.8 on kfreebsd still
> require hal or will it just have reduced functionality?
>
On
anel for example) and xfapplet plugin isn't really
maintained upstream either but in case someone has interest in this
it /might/ be a solution for someone motivated to keep a gnome-panel
alternative.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
map pages is quite interesting too:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Roadmap
Note that we do try to improve that in Debian too. See #552688,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/01/msg6.html,
#605090 (though it's not about the default install).
Regards,
-
e user” might not have security concerns as high as
“business users”, I think they'd prefer their private stuff to stay
private, wether it's their family pictures, their bank account stuff, or
something else. It applies to various other threats too.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexi
resolver is more like the “client” side of things, while service
publication is more the “server” side of things.
If you don't want your host to resolve “local” stuff at all, you can
edit /etc/nsswitch.conf and remove the mdns stuff.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 16:08 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> We don't like security by obscurity, as you might know.
Not shouting out loud that a service is available doesn't qualify as
“security by obscurity” for me.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers
* Package name: lightdm
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Robert Ancell
* URL : https://launchpad.net/lightdm
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C/
Description : simple display manager wi
m advantages make this worthwhile.
>
Did you do an archive check with the new lintian and diff'ed it against
a check with previous lintian?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers
* Package name: tumbler
Version : 0.1.6
Upstream Author : Jannis Pohlmann
* URL : http://www.xfce.org/
* License : GPL-2+/LGPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : d-bus thumbnailing serv
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Yves-Alexis Perez"
* Package name: garcon
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : Jannis Pohlmann
* URL : http://www.xfce.org
* License : GPL-2+/LGPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : menu library
g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers
* Package name: libxfce4ui
Version : 4.8.1
Upstream Author : the Xfce development team
* URL : http://www.xfce.org/
* License : LGPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : widget library for
ocumentation for each library too, when a new ghc
> arrives.
I don't really know anything about haskell, but is it really needed to
regenerate library docs each time the compiler is updated? What does it
give?
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
stream-trac...@linuxtesting.org
The cross distribution mailing list might be interested to, adding them
to CC:.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
t's a simple package upgrade, while usually
the whole Xfce stack is installed. I've tried with the xfce4 metapackage
and the upgrade correctly picks xfce4-settings and wants to remove MCS.
So while the partial upgrade for only xfce4-session is a bit broken
(well, if you ask for xfce4-session install it works too), in general it
won't be a problem.
Thanks for your help and your time.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
usable.
Which is the case here, and why the fields were added in the first
place.
>
>
> Or in short: either make empty dummy packages out of them or
> just leave them alone.
Which would then need to Depends on xfce4-settings in order to provide
the same set of functionality, adding complexity to the dependencies.
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Breaks: in order to keep a Recommends: satisfied
looks to me like the wrong thing to do, though I'm not fluent enough in
dependencies to be sure.
By the way, adding a Breaks: xfce4-mcs-manager in xfce4-settings doesn't
work either, apt will still prefer to hold xfce4-session and keep
xfce4-mcs-
On 19/11/2010 08:52, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Anyone knows why and how to fix that? Would a “breaks” instead of a
> “conflicts” fix it?
Seems that “Breaks:” doesn't work either:
> Investigating (0) xfce4-settings [ amd64 ] < none -> 4.6.5-3 > ( xfce )
> Broken xfce
(4.6.2-2) depends on xfce4-settings which in turns
Conflicts: xfce4-mcs-plugins. For some reason, apt-get doesn't want to
remove xfce4-mcs-plugins and prefers to keep xfce4-settings uninstalled,
and thus xfce4-session at the previous version.
Anyone knows why and how to fix that? Would a “brea
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
